On Sep 8, 2:19 am, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, MIG wrote:
On Sep 6, 11:32 pm, " wrote:

Why should we not be able to treat Crow with the same risible contempt
that he shows for Londoners everytime he decides to give his supporters
a few more days' holiday at Londoners' expense?

Or does Crow have a monopoly on senseless "gratuitous, abusive non-
sequiturs"?

Funny how there are such strong objections when, for a brief period, a
trade union uses the same tactics that all businesses use every minute
of every day.

Oh yes, because businesses routinely shut down most of the London
Underground on a whim.


They shut down whole industries to move to countries where workers are
cheaper etc etc, leaving thousands with no work to go to permanently.
This is good business and gets the best returns for the shareholders
(a legal requirement).

You don't have to look far to find people whose good business has done
more harm to jobs, public transport etc than Bob Crow.