Hear hear. I agree totally with you! Quite frankly it is wishful
thinking to try to argue that the "anti-war" feeling was that
strong. Given the total population of the UK, I do not recall the
country grinding to a halt in a way it would have done so, had
most of its adult population joined a demonstration. There are
other ways of expressing opinions to parading in the streets.

What you write above is totally nonsensical, incoherent and
inconsistent. You argue that anti-war feeling wasn't strong because the
UK didn't grind to a halt as a result of the demonstration. You then
argue that there ways of expressing opinions other than demonstrating.
If that's the case then why on earth are you trying to say that anti-
war feeling wasn't strong on the basis of participation in a
demonstration?

0/10 for intelligence

--
message by Robin May, but you can call me Mr Smith.
Hello. I'm one of those "roaring fascists of the left wing".

Then and than are different words!


Allow me, if I may, to reply.

Robin, you seem to have some difficulty in accepting a consistency between 2
totally consistent and coherent statements:

1. Anti-war feeling is lower than it has been hyped-up to be.
2. There are other ways of making one's anti-war feelings known other an public
street demonstrations.

Marc.