"rob" wrote the following in:



"Robin May" wrote in message
.4...

What you write above is totally nonsensical, incoherent and
inconsistent. You argue that anti-war feeling wasn't strong
because the UK didn't grind to a halt as a result of the
demonstration. You then argue that there ways of expressing
opinions other than demonstrating. If that's the case then why on
earth are you trying to say that anti- war feeling wasn't strong
on the basis of participation in a demonstration?

0/10 for intelligence

The sort of response I guess I should expect! Because I don't
agree with your sentiments, my views are "totally nonsensical,
incoherent and inconsistent! and I get 0/10 for intelligence!

Not because you don't agree with me, but because what you said didn't
make sense. You said:

1. That anti-war feeling isn't very strong because the number of people
who demonstrated was a small percentage of the total population.

2. That there are ways of expressing opinion other than demonstrating.

So in part 1 you only count those who demonstrated against the war as
being anti-war. Then in part 2 you claimed there were other ways of
expressing an anti-war opinion. This doesn't make sense: you claim
there are other ways of expressing an opinion, and yet in part 1 you
totally ignore these ways and only consider demonstration. Does this
make sense? No.

Typical of those who force their views on others through
demonstrating perhaps?

I've never attended a demonstration.

--
message by Robin May, but you can call me Mr Smith.
Hello. I'm one of those "roaring fascists of the left wing".

Then and than are different words!