On 30 Mar, 21:15, MIG wrote:
Which was meant to imply that striking for one need not be a cover for
the other, since safety of passengers (and staff) and good pay and
conditions for staff are likely to correlate well.

Which I don't happen to believe is true. The tube was pretty damn safe
long before the drivers managed to screw a middle management wage out
of LUL.

B2003