View Single Post
  #34   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 08, 09:03 PM posted to uk.transport.london
MIG MIG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,154
Default Stratford - huh?

On Apr 3, 7:44*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On 3 Apr, 14:23, "Tim Roll-Pickering"
wrote:

MIG wrote:
Last week I saw notices by those readers which suggested that they're
for
Oyster users going out of zone, not people who've come down in the lift.


Yeah, it's possible that you'd enter the system by a cross-platform
interchange and/or ungated station, not needing to touch your Oyster
because of using a travelcard, and then realise that you needed to
travel beyond your zones on LU.
BUT in that case, why only at Bank and only on the DLR?


There aren't actually that many other in station Underground-DLR
interchanges that I can think of - Stratford and Canning Town are the only
ones that spring to mind and I don't know if the latter has any internal
readers, but it did used to have a non-Oyster service.


Canning Town does not have any internal standalone Oyster readers,
though it did when the NLL was open.



Was the original idea perhaps that DLR would be keep distinct and people
expected to always touch in upon entry.


I have *never* heard or read the supposed requirement that you state
anywhere else beforehand, so might I suggest that you may have somehow
come to that erroneous (mis)understanding after having seen the DLR
posters which in fact issue a different instruction - that holders of
period Travelcards on Oyster who are travelling outside their zones on
DLR need to remember to touch-in and out (so as to ensure the correct
excess fare is debited from their PAYG balance).

Why can't
they provide them for that purpose on all LU platforms so that you
don't have to go all the way to the exit at the point when you realise
that you are going to use PAYG to complete an unplanned journey (or
extension of a paper travelcard as it happens)?


Because that would be too convenient for customers?


No. It would create plentiful opportunities for people who's
destination station was ungated (or indeed for those willing to take
more of a risk their origination station was ungated) to abuse the
system by underpaying their fare, by staring or finishing their
journey short.


Oh come off it. Are you saying that people determined to avoid a fare
wouldn't think it was worth the effort of going to the exit to touch
in, while those trying to pay the right fare should have obstacles put
in their place? This really ain't joined-up.