On May 13, 12:16*am, Ernst S Blofeld
wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Yet again a London paper uses the term 'overground' confusingly, as the
'Overground' has been Oyster enabled since November.

Moreover, Overground didn't exist as such before November and was Oyster
enabled from the outset. Also it was the OP that confusingly capitalised
the term, not the paper.

I was referring to a headline which happened to be all in capitals,
not the story in the link.