Steve writes:
Yes, that was the point of the charge, i.e. to increase the movement of
transport in the zone. To argue that because the road was clear you should
not pay is nonsensical.

So it's not a "congestion" charge then - it's yet another road use
charge. Better tell Ken to change the name...

--
Jonathan Marten, SCM Team Engineer VSP at GMP, UK
Sun Microsystems

"Progress is not expedited by frequent requests for progress reports"