Jonathan Marten - Volume Systems Products UK wrote:
Steve writes:
Yes, that was the point of the charge, i.e. to increase the movement of
transport in the zone. To argue that because the road was clear you should
not pay is nonsensical.

So it's not a "congestion" charge then - it's yet another road use
charge.

Nah, that just means that it's working.

--
Steven O'Neill
www.bridgetolls.org