In misc.transport.urban-transit Robert Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:12:31 -0000, Access Systems
In misc.transport.urban-transit Aidan Stanger wrote:
Access Systems wrote:
why should there be a problem...people in wheelchairs regularly ride NYC
and Tokyo subways at rush hour, what makes the tube any less possible.
The fact that it isn't so heavily subsidized.

Fine, what would you like - accessibility or service cuts?

don't ever ask that question of someone who is getting NO service at all,
you might not like the answer.

what would you prefer some service or no service is the same question if
you ask a person in a wheelchair.

Vehicle replacement (providing trains with wheelchair access) is
relatively easy. Putting access into a deep level mass transit system
is much more easy

???? I don't understand the question

Bob


--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety", Benjamin Franklin
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob
NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail
NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, engineers
NO attachments in e-mail, *LINUX powered* access is a civil right
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named