"Martin Petrov" wrote ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ansport-london
Dearie me, what a grade A plank.
Reduces dwell times for buses (massively) and reduces the opportunity
for drivers to pocket cash, stops you needing to fumble for change at
the ticket machine, and is just generally A GOOD IDEA.
But no, you think you're being watched by MI5. (like they've nothing
better to do.)

If I ran the buses, you'd be expected to touch in AND out on them too - much
better info for service planning.

Mind you, I was on a Bendie (73) one day; I hadn't touched in, though I
usually do, as I had my arms full of junk - I saw a seat and dived for it.

Ticket Inspector: You haven't touched in
Me: I didn't think I had to - it's a Gold Card
Ticket Inspector No, You don't *have* to.
Me: {Quizzical look}
Ticket Inspector: But if you were kidnapped, we'd be able to trace your
last movements
Me: Thanks. (Wonders: was that really an inspector,
or was it a tin foil hat person in disguise?)

I also wonder what Guardian Man has to fear; as well as giving honest men
nightmares (as if!), Oyster can help in catching crims. And has done. Oyster
and cameras are a great combination. Did I say CAMERAS? Oh my God! Cameras!
Closed circuit! MI5/6/7 ... 43

And, like the bendies, the advantages of Oyster would only be visible after
it was banned - thousands more ticket office jobs in a difficult time - but
fares raised to cover them; much slower buses (imagine the 38/73 congestion
at Angel every morning as drivers have to look at every ticket).

No wonder the Guardian is losing readers every year.

--
Andrew

"When 'Do no Evil' has been understood, then learn the harder, braver rule,
Do Good." ~ Arthur Guiterman