On 7 Feb, 10:52, wrote:
In article ,

(Adrian) wrote:
gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:

I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory
without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has revealed
legal reasons why he can not comment on the case ...

Has he? Where? He is certainly refusing to talk about it, but I
haven't
seen him give any legal reason why he could not do so.

He doesn't want to talk about - wisely, imho - in the run-up to his
standards board hearing. It's not a court case, true.

It's a hearing by a panel of the City Council's Standards Committee. When
the Standards Board considered these sorts of things you wouldn't have
read about it until after the hearing.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Well, Colin, of course I shouldn't comment upon the case, but I hope
it's all right to say that I'm sorry to hear about your spot of
trouble, and I hope it all goes all right for you. You seem like a
decent fellow, and I wish you well.