Vic Lilley wrote:
On Mar 27, 1:01 am, "Richard J." wrote:

On 26 Mar, 16:38, Vic Lilley wrote:
Motorist denied court hearings, asks Mayor where he stands
[snip]

Setting aside the obscure legal arguments, what are your real concerns
about the operation of PATAS? Do you have any examples where bias has
been demonstrated? Is this all because you were caught not paying the
congestion charge 5 years ago?

Sorry. Here is a brief explanation from my web site which I hope will
clarify things.

‘Lilley, who is not a user of the congestion charge scheme, got a
congestion charging penalty charge notice for £50, out of the blue,
dated 6th September 2004 and timed 18:13:19, when he accidentally went
into London in the evening, earlier than normal, to see a play.

Oh, surprise, surprise! This is all because you entered the zone during
its hours of operation and failed to pay the charge. Instead of just
paying the legitimate penalty, you claim you are "not a user of the
congestion charge scheme", and that everyone else is biased. Just cough
up and shut up.

--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)