Cyclists allowed to run red lights?
Roger Thorpe wrote:
Steve Firth wrote:
Roger Thorpe wrote:
Steve Firth wrote:
Roger Thorpe wrote:
I'd like to read those posts. I think that Brian would probably
admit to
having views that diverge from those of the rest of the URC
regulars,
but he is remarkably open and honest.
He's anything but open and honest. He's a lying ****weasel who
considers
that it's reasonable to get ****-face drunk then to take charge of a
vehicle carrying passengers, none of whom even have seat belts.
But you only know this *because* he is open and honest about it.
The fact that he boasts about recklessly endangering the lives of others
does not make him "open and honest".
I've not read him "boast" about it, you'll have to ask him if he thinks
that it was a wise thing to do. I think that I know what his answer
might be.
I'm not so sure that you do. He has certainly revelled in the
controversy on more than one newsgroup, sometimes 'gleefully'.
Reggie and Ronnie Kray liked everyone to know who they had had killed
and injured. By your argument above that makes them "open and honest".
No it doesn't, because my argument is based on the premise that he
regrets that action, but was prepared to confess it. Sadly a couple of
trolls here will continue to use it as a stick to beat him.
The reason he gets 'beaten with a stick' could be related to his very
open hatred (no, thats not an exaggeration) of private cars and/or their
drivers. Since he insists on being so deliberately confrontational, I
think its churlish to call those who respond in similarly 'robust'
fashion trolls. Perhaps you should read more of Googles comprehensive
posting history on him and then re-evaluate your viewpoint?
|