On 6 Oct, 11:14, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 02:32:52 -0700 (PDT)

Halmyre wrote:
On 6 Oct, 09:42, wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:27:33 +0100

Tom Barry wrote:
....in any of which he would have been acting in the capacity of a state
operative of a one party state run by our mate Gaddafi. =A0Anyway, it's
immaterial - the conviction was highly unsound.

Really? Care to fill us in with your profound insights as to why this is =
so?

You first, let's hear your profound insight as to why it's otherwise.

He was convicted in a court of law. So unless you think the notoriously
lefty judiciary was somehow persuaded to bow to american pressure I can't
see an issue with it.

Still, don't take my word for it - read the original evidence:

http://blogs.findlaw.com/courtside/2...ckerbie-bomber...


And, as any fule kno, *no-one* has *ever* been wrongly convicted in a
court of law.

--
Halmyre