On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Halmyre wrote:
Really? Care to fill us in with your profound insights as to why this is =
so?

You first, let's hear your profound insight as to why it's otherwise.

He was convicted in a court of law. So unless you think the notoriously
lefty judiciary was somehow persuaded to bow to american pressure I can't
see an issue with it.

Still, don't take my word for it - read the original evidence:

http://blogs.findlaw.com/courtside/2...ckerbie-bomber...


And, as any fule kno, *no-one* has *ever* been wrongly convicted in a
court of law.

Perhaps he was , but I've yet to see any evidence as to why from the
tin foil hat brigade. To me it seems they all want him to have been
innocent just so they can stick it to the yanks. The truth isn't
based on the number of braying idiots spouting the same opinion.

B2003