On 10 Nov, 21:44, Walter Briscoe wrote:
In message
s.com of Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:30:21 in uk.transport.london, Mr Thant
writes

On 10 Nov, 16:54, "Paul Scott" wrote:
I think I've lost track of that aspect. Weren't there at one time supposed
to be some slight changes to the Met and District to maintain numbers along
the north and south sides of the common routes as well?

The 2010 frequencies are on slide 15 onwards of this document:
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...ines-Proposed-
Service-Changes.pdf

U

That IS an interesting document. AFAIK, no older posting referred to it.

1) p9/21 graphs "Average excess platform wait time. There are a couple
of text boxes on that graph; for me they seem to use a font which I
don't have and are rendered as gibberish. Do you see them clearly? If
so, please copy to a reply. Later: Foxit Reader renders the text in the
first as "Thisistheaverageam ountofextra tim ethatacustom erhas tow
aitforatraininadditiontotheam ounthe/shew ouldw aitiftheservicew
asrunning perfectly.Thehigherthenum berthew orsetheperformance." (I also
see gibberish is Adobe Reader 9.2) I reckon the message in clear is:
"This is the average amount of extra time that a customer has to wait
for a train in addition to the amount he/she would wait if the service
was running perfectly. The higher the number the worse the performance."
- duplicates "Average extra platform wait time". The second box is
"Circle line".

I saw gibberish in the PDF as well. But then I pasted it into Word
and got

"This is the average amount of extra time that a customer has to wait
for a train in addition to the amount he/she would wait if the service
was running perfectly. The higher the number the worse the
performance."

and

"Circle line"

as you suggest.