Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This morning I've seen a three-unit train running on the DLR, with the
designation "Special", in between other services. (Am I the only one having trouble perceiving the "articulated vehicles" as anything other than units of two coaches?) Presumably it is some kind of test run. The one I saw was made up of the new units. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MIG" wrote in message
This morning I've seen a three-unit train running on the DLR, with the designation "Special", in between other services. (Am I the only one having trouble perceiving the "articulated vehicles" as anything other than units of two coaches?) Like any other articulated vehicles (particularly trams), the short coaches share a bogey. The only mainline trains with this configuration in the UK are Eurostars, but they're quite common elsewhere. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Jan, 13:04, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:25:57 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: This morning I've seen a three-unit train running on the DLR, with the designation "Special", in between other services. (Am I the only one having trouble perceiving the "articulated vehicles" as anything other than units of two coaches?) Presumably it is some kind of test run. *The one I saw was made up of the new units. Probably heading for the possession area to test the signalling at Royal Mint St junction as well as line into and out of Bank. *All supposed to reopen on Monday with three unit trains being phased into service after that. -- Paul C It appeared to be doing a Lewisham and back, so probably doing more general trial runs as well. I would have been interested to see where it stopped at the stations which will be using SDO. Most stopping points have been shifted to where the front of the train will always end up in future, ie the same place regardless of train length. Now it occurs to me that, with phased introduction, the SDO stations will have to have different stopping points for different lengths of train. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
This morning I've seen a three-unit train running on the DLR, with the designation "Special", in between other services. How many people does a three-car DLR hold, and how does that compare with a six-car C stock? How does the speed compare? I'm wondering about whether the "light" railway designation still means anything. -- We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Basil Jet" wrote in message
MIG wrote: This morning I've seen a three-unit train running on the DLR, with the designation "Special", in between other services. How many people does a three-car DLR hold, and how does that compare with a six-car C stock? How does the speed compare? I'm wondering about whether the "light" railway designation still means anything. The 3-car DLR train is about 84m long, compared to about 96m for a 6-car C stock train. But the 3-car DLR trains will be longer than the 80m Class 378 4-car trains. However, the DLR trains are narrower (2.65m vs 2.8m for the 378 and 2.92m for the C stock) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mizter T" wrote in message
On Jan 30, 2:53 pm, "Basil Jet" wrote: MIG wrote: This morning I've seen a three-unit train running on the DLR, with the designation "Special", in between other services. How many people does a three-car DLR hold, and how does that compare with a six-car C stock? How does the speed compare? I'm wondering about whether the "light" railway designation still means anything. Closely spaced stations and lots of rapid acceleration and deceleration are light rail-esque features in my mind. As well as tight curves and steep inclines. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 30, 1:04*pm, Paul Corfield wrote: On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:25:57 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: This morning I've seen a three-unit train running on the DLR, with the designation "Special", in between other services. (Am I the only one having trouble perceiving the "articulated vehicles" as anything other than units of two coaches?) No you're not! Wonder if there's anyone who thinks the trains are about to get 25% smaller! Presumably it is some kind of test run. *The one I saw was made up of the new units. Probably heading for the possession area to test the signalling at Royal Mint St junction as well as line into and out of Bank. *All supposed to reopen on Monday with three unit trains being phased into service after that. More info here at the "DLR Press Room": http://pressroom.dlr.co.uk/news/details.asp?id=220 With the exact same press release available at the main TfL "New centre": http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/medi...tre/14063.aspx Have the DLR actually got their own PR operation or not? The contact details shown at the end of the press release on the DLR site are the main TfL press office, but that doesn't in and of itself mean anything. Plus I thought that DLR did have its own people (and they were DLRL as opposed to Serco Docklands). Anyhow, that's all by the by. I see that the Director of DLR, Jonathan Fox, says "[...] I'm confident our Bank passengers will really notice the difference at the new and improved platforms". They weren't all that scrubby were they - they're pretty new, after all! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 30, 2:53*pm, "Basil Jet" wrote: MIG wrote: This morning I've seen a three-unit train running on the DLR, with the designation "Special", in between other services. How many people does a three-car DLR hold, and how does that compare with a six-car C stock? How does the speed compare? I'm wondering about whether the "light" railway designation still means anything. Closely spaced stations and lots of rapid acceleration and deceleration are light rail-esque features in my mind. Not that I'd want a rail vehicle of any kind, light or heavy, to fall on my head - it's a rather relative term, me thinks! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
"Mizter T" wrote in message On Jan 30, 2:53 pm, "Basil Jet" wrote: How many people does a three-car DLR hold, and how does that compare with a six-car C stock? How does the speed compare? I'm wondering about whether the "light" railway designation still means anything. Closely spaced stations and lots of rapid acceleration and deceleration are light rail-esque features in my mind. As well as tight curves and steep inclines. I suppose what I'm really asking is whether the heavy rail standard still has any virtues. -- We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Basil Jet" wrote in message
Recliner wrote: "Mizter T" wrote in message On Jan 30, 2:53 pm, "Basil Jet" wrote: How many people does a three-car DLR hold, and how does that compare with a six-car C stock? How does the speed compare? I'm wondering about whether the "light" railway designation still means anything. Closely spaced stations and lots of rapid acceleration and deceleration are light rail-esque features in my mind. As well as tight curves and steep inclines. I suppose what I'm really asking is whether the heavy rail standard still has any virtues. Higher speeds, more crashworthy, longer-lasting trains? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Long DLR Trains to Stratford | London Transport | |||
Long DLR Train Part 2 | London Transport | |||
Subway (New York) vs Underground (London) [Quite long] | London Transport | |||
"How long are the delays?" | London Transport | |||
Long-lasting ticket to Brighton | London Transport |