![]() |
NLL resignalling postponed, says Ian Brown of TfL
On Feb 21, 8:47*am, "
wrote: On 20.02.10 21:28, John wrote: Cab signalling would not work for NLL at the current time because the route is used by so many trains which are not fitted. The costs of fitment would be very high. ELLX would have been a good route to try it on with all new trains, but I think they decided the technology was not mature enough when they had to let the contracts. In , *writes I wonder if they considered new types of signalling on the NLL, such as cab signals. Did they consider that at all on the ELLX? That technology has been around since the 1920s and is widely used in other nations. But not normally on tracks shared with other services. They could have started with the ELLX, since it won't really interact with the NLL. Whilst the extended ELL will be separate from the NLL, it will still be running over large stretches of shared track south of Surrey Quays. If it works out, then perhaps they could start considering the NLL in phases. I know that they plan to be rid of goods trains on the line, but trains can also be fitted with cab signals. They don't have to be *built in when the units are being constructed. There is no plans to remove freight traffic from the NLL, in fact much of the work to increase capacity between Camden Road and Stratford is purely for the freight, with long loops etc. being added. |
NLL resignalling postponed, says Ian Brown of TfL
John wrote:
In article , Paul Scott writes John wrote: Cab signalling would not work for NLL at the current time because the route is used by so many trains which are not fitted. The costs of fitment would be very high. ELLX would have been a good route to try it on with all new trains, but I think they decided the technology was not mature enough when they had to let the contracts. That could apply to the core route, but the extensions over NR routes would have then required dual fitted trains, for the same reasons as you point out for the NLL. Paul S But a cab equipped train can run over non cab equipped lines (look at Eurostar for an example). Course it can, but why bother? Surely it is just a waste of money to have cab signalling on a minority of the route. The interface between London Bridge and New Cross signalling centres would presumably be more complex as well - another expense with no benefit. Paul S |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk