![]() |
Inconsistent engineering this weekend information
If you open http://www.tfl.gov.uk/ and navigate via "Live travel news"
to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravelnews/realtime/tube/default.html and navigate via "This weekend" to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravel news/realtime/by-date.aspx?offset=weekend, you will see an advertised Central line Part closure. You may click on it to get "Saturday 27 and Sunday 28 February, suspended between Marble Arch and West Ruislip and between Marble Arch and Ealing Broadway ..." If you navigate via "Track closures" to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/li vetravelnews/realtime/tube/track-closures.pdf, you will see no information on such a closure. These 2 sources of information are regularly inconsistent. Live travel news seems to be more reliable. I have flagged this by phone to LU CSC. It may be fixed by the time others look at it. -- Walter Briscoe |
Inconsistent engineering this weekend information
On 24/02/2010 16:07, Walter Briscoe wrote:
If you openhttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/ and navigate via "Live travel news" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravelnews/realtime/tube/default.html and navigate via "This weekend" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravel news/realtime/by-date.aspx?offset=weekend, you will see an advertised Central line Part closure. You may click on it to get "Saturday 27 and Sunday 28 February, suspended between Marble Arch and West Ruislip and between Marble Arch and Ealing Broadway ..." If you navigate via "Track closures" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/li vetravelnews/realtime/tube/track-closures.pdf, you will see no information on such a closure. These 2 sources of information are regularly inconsistent. Live travel news seems to be more reliable. It's possible for Engineering Work plans to change *after* the "Six month look ahead" has been published. (And also after the internal notices and posters about said Engineering Work have been published) Theoretically, the "Real-Time" web page and Travelcheck should be ther most reliable, as they can be updated in real time. Cheers, Barry |
Inconsistent engineering this weekend information
In message of Thu, 25 Feb 2010
01:32:42 in uk.transport.london, Barry Salter writes On 24/02/2010 16:07, Walter Briscoe wrote: If you openhttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/ and navigate via "Live travel news" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravelnews/realtime/tube/default.html and navigate via "This weekend" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravel news/realtime/by-date.aspx?offset=weekend, you will see an advertised Central line Part closure. You may click on it to get "Saturday 27 and Sunday 28 February, suspended between Marble Arch and West Ruislip and between Marble Arch and Ealing Broadway ..." If you navigate via "Track closures" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/li vetravelnews/realtime/tube/track-closures.pdf, you will see no information on such a closure. These 2 sources of information are regularly inconsistent. Live travel news seems to be more reliable. It's possible for Engineering Work plans to change *after* the "Six month look ahead" has been published. (And also after the internal notices and posters about said Engineering Work have been published) Theoretically, the "Real-Time" web page and Travelcheck should be ther most reliable, as they can be updated in real time. Thanks, Barry. I will look at writing a little code to take information from the HTML rather than the .PDF. -- Walter Briscoe |
Inconsistent engineering this weekend information
On Feb 24, 4:07*pm, Walter Briscoe
wrote: If you open http://www.tfl.gov.uk/ and navigate via "Live travel news" to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravelnews/realtime/tube/default.html and navigate via "This weekend" to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravel news/realtime/by-date.aspx?offset=weekend, you will see an advertised Central line Part closure. You may click on it to get "Saturday 27 and Sunday 28 February, suspended between Marble Arch and West Ruislip and between Marble Arch and Ealing Broadway ..." If you navigate via "Track closures" to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/li vetravelnews/realtime/tube/track-closures.pdf, you will see no information on such a closure. The '6 month lookahead' previously showed the Central Line closure, but it seems to have been removed in the last couple of weeks. I assume that it was done so in error - there are plenty of posters advertising the closure at Central Line stations, and it was included in the weekly email, so it definitely seems to be going ahead. (Combined with a large stretch of line closed along the top of the sub- surface lines, I'm beginning to think that someone at TfL has a grudge against me and is deliberately making it hard for me to get to work this weekend - they scheduled a similar combination of closures in November, last time I was on night shifts.) |
Inconsistent engineering this weekend information
"Barry Salter" wrote in message ... On 24/02/2010 16:07, Walter Briscoe wrote: If you openhttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/ and navigate via "Live travel news" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravelnews/realtime/tube/default.html and navigate via "This weekend" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/livetravel news/realtime/by-date.aspx?offset=weekend, you will see an advertised Central line Part closure. You may click on it to get "Saturday 27 and Sunday 28 February, suspended between Marble Arch and West Ruislip and between Marble Arch and Ealing Broadway ..." If you navigate via "Track closures" tohttp://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/li vetravelnews/realtime/tube/track-closures.pdf, you will see no information on such a closure. These 2 sources of information are regularly inconsistent. Live travel news seems to be more reliable. It's possible for Engineering Work plans to change *after* the "Six month look ahead" has been published. (And also after the internal notices and posters about said Engineering Work have been published) However the PDF does claim to be correct as at 19th February and I know this closure had already been planned before this date. Peter Smyth |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk