![]() |
Signs at St. James' Park
Why are some signs at St. James' Park spelled St. James's Park and some
spelled St. James' Park. I'm quite surprised they didn't notice it when they were put up ages ago. -- To reply direct, remove NOSPAM and replace with railwaysonline For Train Information, The Latest News & Best photos around check out the Award Winning Railways Online at http://www.railwaysonline.co.uk |
Signs at St. James' Park
In message , Joe
writes Why are some signs at St. James' Park spelled St. James's Park and some spelled St. James' Park. I'm quite surprised they didn't notice it when they were put up ages ago. That's nothing.... We have Upminister Bridge and Upminster on the same sign. -- Kat The one thing that unites all human beings, regardless of age, gender, religion, economic status, or ethnic background, is that, deep down inside, we all believe that we are above-average drivers. |
Signs at St. James' Park
Joe wrote:
Why are some signs at St. James' Park spelled St. James's Park and some spelled St. James' Park. I'm quite surprised they didn't notice it when they were put up ages ago. AFAIK there is only one incorrect "St. James' Park" sign (eastbound, near the front of the train, by the stairs). Considering that the LU HQ is above the station, it's remarkable that the sign has never been replaced. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Signs at St. James' Park
AFAIK there is only one incorrect "St. James' Park" sign (eastbound, near
the front of the train, by the stairs). Considering that the LU HQ is above the station, it's remarkable that the sign has never been replaced. St. James' Park is the correct way to show it. St James's Park is incorrect. Its like; I'm going to Chris' House, not I'm going to Chris's house -- To reply direct, remove NOSPAM and replace with railwaysonline For Train Information, The Latest News & Best photos around check out the Award Winning Railways Online at http://www.railwaysonline.co.uk |
Signs at St. James' Park
Joe wrote:
AFAIK there is only one incorrect "St. James' Park" sign (eastbound, near the front of the train, by the stairs). Considering that the LU HQ is above the station, it's remarkable that the sign has never been replaced. St. James' Park is the correct way to show it. St James's Park is incorrect. Its like; I'm going to Chris' House, not I'm going to Chris's house But surely you *say* "Chris's house", in which case why not spell it that way? Although there are some exceptions, it's normal to use 's after singular names ending in s. Before you try to lay down the law on the use of apostrophes, you'd better learn when to put one in "it's". -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Signs at St. James' Park
St. James' Park is the correct way to show it. St James's Park is
incorrect. Its like; I'm going to Chris' House, not I'm going to Chris's house I think this is an area that can cause much debate. A quick internet search suggests a consensus for using an apostrophe and an s unless the word sounds ugly with it and that is certainly how I use it. I would certainly say Chris's house and I would generally say St James's Park, just as I would say princess's or Thomas's. However many would find Thomas's ugly and just use Thomas' (as in St Thomas' Hospital). Sometimes I do myself and I will sometimes say St James' Park when it trips off the tongue better. However regardless of any of that St James's Park is the accepted correct name for the park. On the other hand it seems Newcastle play at St James' Park and Exeter City at either St James Park or St James' Park depending on if you read The Guardian or The Times. |
Signs at St. James' Park
I agree that "St. James' " or "St. James's" is a matter of debate. It is
considered better practice to omit the additional "s", although I would not agree that it is grammatically wrong to include it. Why do I say "better practice"? Because it is The Queen's English and Her Majesty's Court is known as the "Court of St. James' " and not the Court of "St. James's". For example, Ambassadors are appointed to "the Court of St. James' ", not "the Court of St. James's" or even "the Court of St. James". Marc. |
Signs at St. James' Park
Mait001 wrote:
I agree that "St. James' " or "St. James's" is a matter of debate. It is considered better practice to omit the additional "s", By whom? although I would not agree that it is grammatically wrong to include it. Why do I say "better practice"? Because it is The Queen's English and Her Majesty's Court is known as the "Court of St. James' " and not the Court of "St. James's". For example, Ambassadors are appointed to "the Court of St. James' ", not "the Court of St. James's" or even "the Court of St. James". The Queen doesn't agree with you. The Court Circulars refer to "the Court of St James's". Example at http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...883468,00.html -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Signs at St. James' Park
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 10:16:59 -0000, "Joe"
wrote: AFAIK there is only one incorrect "St. James' Park" sign (eastbound, near the front of the train, by the stairs). Considering that the LU HQ is above the station, it's remarkable that the sign has never been replaced. St. James' Park is the correct way to show it. St James's Park is incorrect. Its like; I'm going to Chris' House, not I'm going to Chris's house A common misconception. The "s" after the apostorphe is only omitted if the word is a plural, rather than a singular, noun. E.g. "boys' games" compared to "Burns's poems." -- Nick Cooper [Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!] The London Underground at War: http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm 625-Online - classic British television: http://www.625.org.uk 'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic: http://www.thingstocome.org.uk |
Signs at St. James' Park
I agree that "St. James' " or "St. James's" is a matter of debate. It
is considered better practice to omit the additional "s", By whom? I always thought that they were to show posession and to show missing letters in words. Anyone who watched 'Grumpy Old Men' a few weeks ago will know that Barons Court doesn't belong to a Baron, yet Earl's Court belongs to an Earl. Does St James'/St James's/St James/St. James Park belong to St James? -- To reply direct, remove NOSPAM and replace with railwaysonline For Train Information, The Latest News & Best photos around check out the Award Winning Railways Online at http://www.railwaysonline.co.uk |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk