![]() |
|
New East London Line report
At last!
Bit late to the party, i know, but i went on it. It was very new, not very busy, the trains were very quiet, and Dalston Junction station is HUGE. Why is it so huge? And what are the plans for Shoreditch High Street (or as i like to call it, Directly Opposite My Office On Commercial Street) - will the views to the arches and pillars and other quite nice old bits of railway architecture be maintained, or is the surrounding area going to be turned into a tower block? The stretch from Dalston to Shoreditch was oddly reminiscent of being in New York; one of the elevated bits of ths subway (or the Metro-North, perhaps) looking down over converted warehouses and so on. The buildingscape is much more clean and cubic and less blobby and random than the otherwise comparable stretch of the West Anglia line from Hackney Downs to Bethnal Green. I was late for work because of the detour i took to go on it, so i hope you all appreciate this report! tom -- My goal wasn't to make a ton of money. It was to build good computers. -- Woz |
New East London Line report
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message th.li... At last! Bit late to the party, i know, but i went on it. It was very new, not very busy, the trains were very quiet, and Dalston Junction station is HUGE. Why is it so huge? I expect they have planned the platform sizes to allow for the maximum flows expected when the 16 tph service is running. Because only 8 tph will run between there and Highbury and Islington, it will be the obvious place for people to change when going 'southbound' - but may also be encouraged northbound as well if the smaller stations (for example some of those on the original ELL) start suffering platform level congestion due to changing trains? BTW, can anyone provide a link to a categoric statement on which of the four sub-services will run through to Highbury, and which will terminate at Dalston Junction? I see it has come up in the London Reconnections blog without a quick answer... And what are the plans for Shoreditch High Street (or as i like to call it, Directly Opposite My Office On Commercial Street) - will the views to the arches and pillars and other quite nice old bits of railway architecture be maintained, or is the surrounding area going to be turned into a tower block? Seems it is planned to be submerged under tower blocks eventually. Paul S |
New East London Line report
|
New East London Line report
On 5 May, 10:40, wrote:
In article i, (Tom Anderson) wrote: At last! Bit late to the party, i know, but i went on it. It was very new, not very busy, the trains were very quiet, and Dalston Junction station is HUGE. Why is it so huge? And what are the plans for Shoreditch High Street (or as i like to call it, Directly Opposite My Office On Commercial Street) - will the views to the arches and pillars and other quite nice old bits of railway architecture be maintained, or is the surrounding area going to be turned into a tower block? The stretch from Dalston to Shoreditch was oddly reminiscent of being in New York; one of the elevated bits of ths subway (or the Metro-North, perhaps) looking down over converted warehouses and so on. The buildingscape is much more clean and cubic and less blobby and random than the otherwise comparable stretch of the West Anglia line from Hackney Downs to Bethnal Green. Have you not been on the District West of Earl's Court? Quite a few viaducts with elevated running. From Putney Bridge to East Putney is probably most similar to what you describe, though that viaduct is narrower, having always been only double track. I was late for work because of the detour i took to go on it, so i hope you all appreciate this report! I've not yet got to go. Too busy with the election. Next week, hopefully! -- Colin Rosenstiel I contributed virtually all of the following pics on Wikipedia: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ca...ailway_station http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ca...ailway_station http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ca...ailway_station http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ca...ailway_station http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...ns14=1&ns100=1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...ns14=1&ns100=1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...ns14=1&ns100=1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...ns14=1&ns100=1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...ns14=1&ns100=1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...+station&go=Go http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...ns14=1&ns100=1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...ril_2010. JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi..._New_Cross.JPG |
New East London Line report
Tom Anderson wrote:
At last! Bit late to the party, i know, but i went on it. It was very new, not very busy, the trains were very quiet, and Dalston Junction station is HUGE. Why is it so huge? IIRC it's been built with more than one eye on the future Chelsea-Hackney Crossrail 2 line sharing the same facilities. Obviously building it big enough in the first place is a good deal easier than enlarging a too-small station when it's actually in daily use. Tom |
New East London Line report
On May 5, 10:03*pm, Tom Barry wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: At last! Bit late to the party, i know, but i went on it. It was very new, not very busy, the trains were very quiet, and Dalston Junction station is HUGE. Why is it so huge? IIRC it's been built with more than one eye on the future Chelsea-Hackney Crossrail 2 line sharing the same facilities. *Obviously building it big enough in the first place is a good deal easier than enlarging a too-small station when it's actually in daily use. Tom Yet they didn't build the bays capable of taking 8-car trains? |
New East London Line report
Jamie Thompson wrote:
On May 5, 10:03 pm, Tom Barry wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: At last! Bit late to the party, i know, but i went on it. It was very new, not very busy, the trains were very quiet, and Dalston Junction station is HUGE. Why is it so huge? IIRC it's been built with more than one eye on the future Chelsea-Hackney Crossrail 2 line sharing the same facilities. Obviously building it big enough in the first place is a good deal easier than enlarging a too-small station when it's actually in daily use. Tom Yet they didn't build the bays capable of taking 8-car trains? No, but that's only for ELL trains from the south, the Chelsea-Hackney stuff would be underground roughly at right-angles from that plans I've seen. Tom |
New East London Line report
On May 5, 10:40*am, wrote: I've not yet got to go. Too busy with the election. Next week, hopefully! Election? |
New East London Line report
Jamie Thompson wrote:
On May 5, 10:03 pm, Tom Barry wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: At last! Bit late to the party, i know, but i went on it. It was very new, not very busy, the trains were very quiet, and Dalston Junction station is HUGE. Why is it so huge? IIRC it's been built with more than one eye on the future Chelsea-Hackney Crossrail 2 line sharing the same facilities. Obviously building it big enough in the first place is a good deal easier than enlarging a too-small station when it's actually in daily use. Tom Yet they didn't build the bays capable of taking 8-car trains? That's probably because there are so many other platforms on the original ELL that cannot easily be extended beyond current size. If they wanted to use longer trains generally, Dalston would be the least of the problems. Paul S |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:19 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk