Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
[originally posted to uk.railway]
[x-posted to uk.transport.london] On May 6, 6:52*am, Stephen Furley wrote: The day before I started the course in Wokingham last week I was told that I was being sent on another one for four days this week. *Nothing for several years, then two in two weeks.This one is in London, close to Ladbroke Grove Underground station, *I decided the best way to get there was train to Shepherds Bush, and then walk from there. *I haven't used the West London Line recently, the last time was just after Imperial Wharf station opened, and that was only as far as Kensington Olympia. *The trains used to not be full, except during major events at Earls Court, and even then there were not usually many people standing. *I was expecting to have to stand from Smitham to Clapham Junction, but not on the West London. *On Tuesday I was on a Southern train terminating at Shepherds Bush, and was a few minutes late getting to the venue, so yesterday I went earlier and caught a London Overground train, going through to Gospel Oak. *Both were very heavily loaded; a match for anything on the peak-hour Southern. *What has changed the situation s much in such a short time? *Shepherds Bush station was open when I last used the line, though I didn't go hat far, indeed, I'd never been through the station until Tuesday. *There were quite a few schoolboys who got out at West Brompton, but presumably they would have been using that station for some years. The obvious answer would seem to be the opening of the Westfield Centre, but I wasn't travelling in either direction during shopping hours, and few of the evening passengers showed any evidence of being shoppers. *I suppose some of them could have been staff at the Centre, the times would have been about right for that, but if the trains are so full at the times I used them, what are they like when they are full of shoppers, and shopping? Shepherds Bush station itself is very busy, and very crowded; is it going to be able to cope in future? *If so many people are using the station even outside shopping hours, surely this indicates that the station was needed before; why was it not built until almost seventy years after Uxbridge Road closed? Are the trains this full all day? I don't know at quite what time of day you used the line, and when you last used it, but the WLL has become increasingly popular over the past several years (i.e. looking back over the past decade - and bearing in mind that the Clapham Jn to Willesden Jn service was only re-introduced in the mid-90's). It's become pretty well used throughout the day - both London Overground (LO) (formerly Silverlink Metro) and Southern services - and during the peaks it has been packed for some time. Note that this was the case *before* the opening of Shepherd's Bush station and the subsequent opening of the Westfield shopping centre - the latter has of course particularly led to further increases in off-peak traffic on the line. From today's perspective it's easy to say that the line used to be something of an underutilised resource for passenger traffic, considering how popular it is today - it;s success mirrors that of the North London Line (and indeed, as you know, some peak trains run through past Willesden Jn onto the NLL - more such through running is to come throughout the day once NLL improvements are finished) - indeed it almost seems blindingly obvious that passenger services on this line would be a hit, and bemusing to think that they didn't exist before the mid-90's. However travel patterns change, demographics change, traffic congestion changes the picture, etc etc etc. In the past there wasn't either the demand or the perceived demand for such trains, with people using buses and cars for making such orbital journeys, or routing themselves through central London, or just not making such journeys at all. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() One think you haven't mentioned is the "isolationist" attitude of the Southern Region which resulted in a resistance to re-opening the West London Line and the Snow Hill Line as well. Wonder what they would have thought of the ELL going down to West Croydon? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Rigg wrote:
One think you haven't mentioned is the "isolationist" attitude of the Southern Region which resulted in a resistance to re-opening the West London Line and the Snow Hill Line as well. Wonder what they would have thought of the ELL going down to West Croydon? Many people might have thought of that as the SR expanding into a new terminus in Dalston, I reckon. That'll be why it has been built as a third rail branch off the main network - and IMHO it would have worked exactly the same using SN operated trains, if the 378s had been bought for them instead. Paul S |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Rigg" wrote in message ... One think you haven't mentioned is the "isolationist" attitude of the Southern Region which resulted in a resistance to re-opening the West London Line and the Snow Hill Line as well. Wonder what they would have thought of the ELL going down to West Croydon? The Southern Railway was a part owner of the East London Railway (and for that matter, of the West London Extension Railway). Peter |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 6, 6:31*pm, "Peter Masson" wrote:
The Southern Railway was a part owner of the East London Railway Which always makes it strange it did not get SR third rails when they did the inner suburban lines it connected to at the southern end of the ELL. -- Nick |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D7666" wrote in message ... On May 6, 6:31 pm, "Peter Masson" wrote: The Southern Railway was a part owner of the East London Railway Which always makes it strange it did not get SR third rails when they did the inner suburban lines it connected to at the southern end of the ELL. That's because it had already got 4th rails - although the SECR and LBSCR part owned it, from 1913 the Metropolitan ran all the passenger trains. Until 1941, as well as the Shoreditch/Whitechapel to New Cross stations service here were through trains from Hammersmith (H&C) via St Mary's curve. Peter Peter |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 May, 09:00, Mizter T wrote:
I don't know at quite what time of day you used the line, and when you last used it, but the WLL has become increasingly popular over the past several years (i.e. looking back over the past decade - and bearing in mind that the Clapham Jn to Willesden Jn service was only re-introduced in the mid-90's). It's become pretty well used throughout the day - both London Overground (LO) (formerly Silverlink Metro) and Southern services - and during the peaks it has been packed for some time. Note that this was the case *before* the opening of Shepherd's Bush station and the subsequent opening of the Westfield shopping centre - the latter has of course particularly led to further increases in off-peak traffic on the line. Yesterday and today I arrived at Shepherds Bush at about 08:03, and returned from there at about 18:38, so just outside main shopping hours. On Monday about 30 minutes later in the morning and 30 minutes earlier in the evening. The last times I used the line would have been when I met up with a former work colleague at the Great British Beer Festival in August, and shortly after that for an exhibition at Olympia. The exhibition was around midday, and the beer festival just before 17:00 from East Croydon and returning about three hours later. A few years ago I quite often used the line at weekends, but haven't done so recently. From today's perspective it's easy to say that the line used to be something of an underutilised resource for passenger traffic, considering how popular it is today - it;s success mirrors that of the North London Line (and indeed, as you know, some peak trains run through past Willesden Jn onto the NLL - more such through running is to come throughout the day once NLL improvements are finished) - indeed it almost seems blindingly obvious that passenger services on this line would be a hit, and bemusing to think that they didn't exist before the mid-90's. However travel patterns change, demographics change, traffic congestion changes the picture, etc etc etc. In the past there wasn't either the demand or the perceived demand for such trains, with people using buses and cars for making such orbital journeys, or routing themselves through central London, or just not making such journeys at all. Look at all of these non-radial routes: Broad Street - Richmond. An obscure outpost of the railway system, little used outside of peak hour city workers. Came close to losing its passenger service altogether. Dalston - Stratford. No service since Broad Street - Poplar closed in about 1940. Even when that was still running there was no direct service to Stratford. I'm not sure when the Victoria Park - Stratford shuttle was withdrawn. Gospel Oak (or Kentish Town) - Barking. I doubt that most Londoners even knew this line existed twenty years ago. East London Line. Had a regular and frequent service, but didn't go very far. West London Line. A few peak hour trains. Nothing north of Kensington, only three stations remaining open. This line must have come close to being closed (to passengers) surely. South London Line. A few peak hour trains, and these little used. I can understand the West London closing during the War, and getting it re-opened probably wasn't the highest priority afterwards, but I'm surprised that it took so long to get a proper service back on it. Was there really no demand for one? How do you predict the likely demand for a service which doesn't exist, with enough certainty to get somebody to put up the money to get it running? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 May, 10:01, "Paul Rigg" wrote:
One think you haven't mentioned is the "isolationist" attitude of the Southern Region which resulted in a resistance to re-opening the West London Line and the Snow Hill Line as well. Wonder what they would have thought of the ELL going down to West Croydon? Not only was were Southern companies (LBSCR, SER, and LCDR) part owners of the ELR, but the LBSCR operated a Liverpool Street to Croydon service over the line. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "W14_Fishbourne" wrote in message ... On 6 May, 10:01, "Paul Rigg" wrote: One think you haven't mentioned is the "isolationist" attitude of the Southern Region which resulted in a resistance to re-opening the West London Line and the Snow Hill Line as well. Wonder what they would have thought of the ELL going down to West Croydon? Not only was were Southern companies (LBSCR, SER, and LCDR) part owners of the ELR, but the LBSCR operated a Liverpool Street to Croydon service over the line. For a time they operated a Liverpool Street to Brighton service. The SER ran Liverpool Street to Addiscombe (which is almost Croydon), and at one time the Great Eastern ran trains fromLiverpool treet to Central Croydon. Peter |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Has this ever happened in London? | London Transport | |||
What happened on the Victoria line yesterday? | London Transport | |||
Elephant and Castle / Walworth Road - what happened? | London Transport | |||
What happened on the Tube tonight | London Transport | |||
What happened on the Tube tonight | London Transport |