![]() |
|
Cameron to be new PM
Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he
wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. |
Cameron to be new PM
Basil Jet wrote:
Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. From where I'm sitting Cameron is damaged, possibly fatally and Boris is doing a very overt bid for the party leadership, distancing himself from the anti-PR nutters (i.e. advocating an alliance with the Lib Dems, which is opposed by the Tory hardcore) and pretending that London voted Tory - it didn't, Labour did much better than expected, possibly enough to unseat Boris if transferred to 2012. For that reason my prediction that he's a one-term Mayor is still valid. Remember, beneath the buffoon is a cold, clever, calculating, ruthlessly ambitious politician. Tom |
Cameron to be new PM
On May 7, 1:22*pm, Basil Jet wrote: Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. I wouldn't presume any such thing - the picture's rather more complicated. And anyway, it's not like there's going to be any more money sloshing around - quite the reverse. The big ticket question for London remains Crossrail. (Can one have a "big ticket question"...?!) |
Cameron to be new PM
On May 7, 1:33*pm, Tom Barry wrote: Basil Jet wrote: Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. *From where I'm sitting Cameron is damaged, possibly fatally and Boris is doing a very overt bid for the party leadership, distancing himself from the anti-PR nutters (i.e. advocating an alliance with the Lib Dems, which is opposed by the Tory hardcore) and pretending that London voted Tory - it didn't, Labour did much better than expected, possibly enough to unseat Boris if transferred to 2012. *For that reason my prediction that he's a one-term Mayor is still valid. I agree. I'm pretty sure I wrote here in the early days of his Mayorality about Boris keeping his eyes on the Westminster prizes. Being Mayor has only ever really been a stepping stone, which is why he makes so sure of projecting himself out to the balcony and circle as well as the stalls. Remember, beneath the buffoon is a cold, clever, calculating, ruthlessly ambitious politician. Agree again. It's what all the informed commentators say, i.e. those with some real insight into his way of doing things. |
Cameron to be new PM
On May 7, 2:20*pm, Mizter T wrote: On May 7, 1:22*pm, Basil Jet wrote: Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. I wouldn't presume any such thing - the picture's rather more complicated. And anyway, it's not like there's going to be any more money sloshing around - quite the reverse. The big ticket question for London remains Crossrail. (Can one have a "big ticket question"...?!) Would a potential Chancellor Cable be any more or less sympathetic to Crossrail? I dunno. |
Cameron to be new PM
"Mizter T" wrote in message
On May 7, 2:20 pm, Mizter T wrote: On May 7, 1:22 pm, Basil Jet wrote: Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. I wouldn't presume any such thing - the picture's rather more complicated. And anyway, it's not like there's going to be any more money sloshing around - quite the reverse. The big ticket question for London remains Crossrail. (Can one have a "big ticket question"...?!) Would a potential Chancellor Cable be any more or less sympathetic to Crossrail? I dunno. I suppose the answer depends on where the Conservative and Lib Dem marginal seats are on the west and east sides of London. But at least they both agree on not allowing a third Heathrow runway. |
Cameron to be new PM
On May 7, 2:49*pm, "Recliner" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: On May 7, 2:20 pm, Mizter T wrote: On May 7, 1:22 pm, Basil Jet wrote: Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. I wouldn't presume any such thing - the picture's rather more complicated. And anyway, it's not like there's going to be any more money sloshing around - quite the reverse. The big ticket question for London remains Crossrail. (Can one have a "big ticket question"...?!) Would a potential Chancellor Cable be any more or less sympathetic to Crossrail? I dunno. I suppose the answer depends on where the Conservative and Lib Dem marginal seats are on the west and east sides of London. But at least they both agree on not allowing a third Heathrow runway. Yes - although I've long regarded a third runway as dead (for the next decade or so at least - well, at the very least, the next Parliament). Maybe that was naive - if the Liberal surge had materialised, and there had been a Lib-Lab coalition (two massive *ifs* I know!), I dunno if the Libs would have put it towards the top of their list of objections, or indeed whether Lab would have cared so much about trying to push it through. |
Cameron to be new PM
"Mizter T" wrote in message
On May 7, 2:49 pm, "Recliner" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: On May 7, 2:20 pm, Mizter T wrote: On May 7, 1:22 pm, Basil Jet wrote: Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. I wouldn't presume any such thing - the picture's rather more complicated. And anyway, it's not like there's going to be any more money sloshing around - quite the reverse. The big ticket question for London remains Crossrail. (Can one have a "big ticket question"...?!) Would a potential Chancellor Cable be any more or less sympathetic to Crossrail? I dunno. I suppose the answer depends on where the Conservative and Lib Dem marginal seats are on the west and east sides of London. But at least they both agree on not allowing a third Heathrow runway. Yes - although I've long regarded a third runway as dead (for the next decade or so at least - well, at the very least, the next Parliament). Maybe that was naive - if the Liberal surge had materialised, and there had been a Lib-Lab coalition (two massive *ifs* I know!), I dunno if the Libs would have put it towards the top of their list of objections, or indeed whether Lab would have cared so much about trying to push it through. The commentators seem to be pretty clear that it won't be very long before there's another general election (a couple of years max), so I suspect that Crossrail will remain, though perhaps in a truncated form, but no other large transport projects will progress very much. |
Cameron to be new PM
On 7 May, 14:59, "Recliner" wrote:
"Mizter T" wrote in message On May 7, 2:49 pm, "Recliner" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: On May 7, 2:20 pm, Mizter T wrote: On May 7, 1:22 pm, Basil Jet wrote: Announcement due at 2:30pm. Presumably this will help Boris do what he wants, although a Tory majority would have been better for him. I wouldn't presume any such thing - the picture's rather more complicated. And anyway, it's not like there's going to be any more money sloshing around - quite the reverse. The big ticket question for London remains Crossrail. (Can one have a "big ticket question"...?!) Would a potential Chancellor Cable be any more or less sympathetic to Crossrail? I dunno. I suppose the answer depends on where the Conservative and Lib Dem marginal seats are on the west and east sides of London. But at least they both agree on not allowing a third Heathrow runway. Yes - although I've long regarded a third runway as dead (for the next decade or so at least - well, at the very least, the next Parliament). Maybe that was naive - if the Liberal surge had materialised, and there had been a Lib-Lab coalition (two massive *ifs* I know!), I dunno if the Libs would have put it towards the top of their list of objections, or indeed whether Lab would have cared so much about trying to push it through. The commentators seem to be pretty clear that it won't be very long before there's another general election (a couple of years max), so I suspect that Crossrail will remain, though perhaps in a truncated form, but no other large transport projects will progress very much. In what sense can Crossrail be truncated? Do you mean no electrification beyond Hayes and Harlington? If so, it won't really be Crossrail, just a pointless tunnel. Perfectly plausible of course. |
Cameron to be new PM
"MIG" wrote in message ... On 7 May, 14:59, "Recliner" wrote: The commentators seem to be pretty clear that it won't be very long before there's another general election (a couple of years max), so I suspect that Crossrail will remain, though perhaps in a truncated form, but no other large transport projects will progress very much. In what sense can Crossrail be truncated? Do you mean no electrification beyond Hayes and Harlington? If so, it won't really be Crossrail, just a pointless tunnel. Perfectly plausible of course. A few pessimists seem to have suggested the Abbey Wood branch could be truncated north of the river, which could save a few quid... Paul S |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk