![]() |
|
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm
Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. |
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
On 28 May, 11:15, Mizter T wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. That's the whole point, isn't it? But the figure for the nominal value of remaining periods on seasons would no doubt be a lot more. |
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
"MIG" wrote in message
On 28 May, 11:15, Mizter T wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. That's the whole point, isn't it? But the figure for the nominal value of remaining periods on seasons would no doubt be a lot more. But these are cards that haven't been used for at least a year. Presumably they are mostly tourists or Londoners who have mislaid unregistered cards. |
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
"Mizter T" wrote in message ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. An average of £1.80 (idle for more than a year) probably just indicates that small sums of that nature are below most people's radar - it's probably a lot less that the error you'd expect if I trying to guess the quantity of change in your back pocket... There's probably about £15.00 on mine, unused for two years because I always use travelcards if just up for the day. I just see it as a £15 note in my wallet that I keep to one side. Paul S |
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
On May 28, 12:33*pm, MIG wrote: On 28 May, 11:15, Mizter T wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. That's the whole point, isn't it? But the figure for the nominal value of remaining periods on seasons would no doubt be a lot more. Sorry, my summary should have been clearer - the crucial word above is "idle" - as Recliner states, these are cards that haven't been used for a year, specifically for the financial year April 2009 to April 2010. |
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
On May 28, 12:49*pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. An average of £1.80 (idle for more than a year) probably just indicates that small sums of that nature are below most people's radar - it's probably a lot less that the error you'd expect if I trying to guess the quantity of change in your back pocket... There's probably about £15.00 on mine, unused for two years because I always use travelcards if just up for the day. *I just see it as a £15 note in my wallet that I keep to one side. Agreed - I don't think there's any big deal or problem here at all, was just interesting to note. As the story makes clear, the unused credit doesn't expire and can be reclaimed by surrendering the card. (Perhaps in many years to come some sort of mechanism for dealing with Oyster cards that have been idle for say 20 years or whatever might become necessary, who knows...) |
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
On 28 May, 15:12, Mizter T wrote:
On May 28, 12:33*pm, MIG wrote: On 28 May, 11:15, Mizter T wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. That's the whole point, isn't it? But the figure for the nominal value of remaining periods on seasons would no doubt be a lot more. Sorry, my summary should have been clearer - the crucial word above is "idle" - as Recliner states, these are cards that haven't been used for a year, specifically for the financial year April 2009 to April 2010. OK thanks both for clarification. I spose it's a bit like the situation with BT phonecards (although not quite as bad) where cards were lost etc, therefore bringing in quite a lot extra for BT. Phonecards were worse because they actually cost more than cash: you couldn't get them out before they chonked off another unit, even if you were about to hang up. |
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
On 2010-05-28 12:43:18 +0100, Recliner said:
"MIG" wrote in message On 28 May, 11:15, Mizter T wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. That's the whole point, isn't it? But the figure for the nominal value of remaining periods on seasons would no doubt be a lot more. But these are cards that haven't been used for at least a year. Presumably they are mostly tourists or Londoners who have mislaid unregistered cards. Or people like me who live outside London and visit now and again, and who have several cards so that I can travel with family members or lend the cards to others. I have one card that may not have been used for a year or two. |
"£30m sits unused on London Oyster travel cards"
"Paul Scott" wrote in message ... "Mizter T" wrote in message ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10162991.stm Average of £1.80 sits on each idle card. An average of £1.80 (idle for more than a year) probably just indicates that small sums of that nature are below most people's radar - it's probably a lot less that the error you'd expect if I trying to guess the quantity of change in your back pocket... There's probably about £15.00 on mine, unused for two years because I always use travelcards if just up for the day. I just see it as a £15 note in my wallet that I keep to one side. So do I but I wouldn't think of leaving 15 pounds on it. 5 pounds is more than enough tim |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk