![]() |
Thames Cable Car for 2012
|
Thames Cable Car for 2012
On 04/07/2010 19:02, Paul Terry wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10501313.stm Thanks. The plans for the Millennium exhibition included a cable car from the Dome to East India Station, so I'll believe this when I see it. |
Thames Cable Car for 2012
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 19:02:14 +0100, Paul Terry wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10501313.stm A new PPP? -- jhk |
Thames Cable Car for 2012
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 19:14:03 +0200, Jarle H Knudsen
wrote: On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 19:02:14 +0100, Paul Terry wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10501313.stm A new PPP? The previous BBC article, which was linked to further up the thread, suggested that the cable car was some kind of substitute for the dual three-lane road bridge that was originally planned. Good to see Ken Livingstone quoted in this article, making the argument that the road bridge is what is needed. By all means have the cable car as well, but not instead of the road. |
Thames Cable Car for 2012
On 05/07/2010 19:03, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 19:14:03 +0200, Jarle H wrote: On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 19:02:14 +0100, Paul Terry wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10501313.stm A new PPP? The previous BBC article, which was linked to further up the thread, suggested that the cable car was some kind of substitute for the dual three-lane road bridge that was originally planned. Good to see Ken Livingstone quoted in this article, making the argument that the road bridge is what is needed. By all means have the cable car as well, but not instead of the road. Good to see Ken just after the 8-years of Labour Mayor + Labour government lecturing others about what should have happened. |
Thames Cable Car for 2012
On Jul 5, 9:50*pm, Basil Jet wrote: On 05/07/2010 19:03, Bruce wrote: [snip] The previous BBC article, which was linked to further up the thread, suggested that the cable car was some kind of substitute for the dual three-lane road bridge that was originally planned. *Good to see Ken Livingstone quoted in this article, making the argument that the road bridge is what is needed. By all means have the cable car as well, but not instead of the road. Good to see Ken just after the 8-years of Labour Mayor + Labour government lecturing others about what should have happened. As I recall he was always in favour of a new crossing between Silvertown and the Greenwich Peninsula and did indeed argue the case for it - but any such thing would have needed very substantial support from central government. Just because Livingstone was Labour (after he wasn't for a little bit) and the government was Labour, your supposed notion that they were signing from the very same hymn sheet is rather ludicrous. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk