Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message MBoZn.113143$m87.61574@hurricane, Steve Dulieu
writes Of course, the last web chat was before TfL took back control of Tubelines, which looks like leading to postponement of the new Piccadilly line stock. So SWT might need to come up with a new plan. Quite, I'm hearing that a 'refresh' might now be on the cards to eke them out to 2020. I wonder if SWT will be so keen then? Indeed, and a 2 car '73 stock is something I'd be interested to see... It might go a bit, assuming that they are both motor cars. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Fitzgerald" ] wrote in message news ![]() In message MBoZn.113143$m87.61574@hurricane, Steve Dulieu writes Of course, the last web chat was before TfL took back control of Tubelines, which looks like leading to postponement of the new Piccadilly line stock. So SWT might need to come up with a new plan. Quite, I'm hearing that a 'refresh' might now be on the cards to eke them out to 2020. I wonder if SWT will be so keen then? Indeed, and a 2 car '73 stock is something I'd be interested to see... It might go a bit, assuming that they are both motor cars. 'Refurbishing them to make them fit for the Island Line' presumably covers any conversion to two car? Are the existing '38 stock exactly 'as received from LU', or are they significantly different? Paul S |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 11:55*am, "Pat O'Neill" wrote:
"1506" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 11:36 am, " wrote: On Jul 7, 5:29 pm, " wrote: On 07/07/2010 21:52, Paul Scott wrote: wrote in message news:jg4Zn.46082$cJ6.13572@hurricane... On 07/07/2010 11:19, Paul Scott wrote: What about for the Island Line? Any going that way? No - 'Island line' is to get 73 stock, according to SWT a few months ago. What's the timeframe on that? They didn't say, I guess it'll depend purely on when the stock gets replaced on LU - so whenever the 2014 (???) stock starts arriving in large numbers? Paul S That's five to six years. Will the 38s hold out that long? I've heard that they are really not in great shape. Where is the Island Line? The Isle of Wight. This stuff innit. ![]() http://patrickoneill204.fotopic.net/p58004145.html Beautiful! Must bokmark your pictures. |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"Pat O'Neill" wrote: "1506" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 11:36 am, " wrote: On Jul 7, 5:29 pm, " wrote: On 07/07/2010 21:52, Paul Scott wrote: wrote in message news:jg4Zn.46082$cJ6.13572@hurricane... On 07/07/2010 11:19, Paul Scott wrote: What about for the Island Line? Any going that way? No - 'Island line' is to get 73 stock, according to SWT a few months ago. What's the timeframe on that? They didn't say, I guess it'll depend purely on when the stock gets replaced on LU - so whenever the 2014 (???) stock starts arriving in large numbers? Paul S That's five to six years. Will the 38s hold out that long? I've heard that they are really not in great shape. Where is the Island Line? The Isle of Wight. This stuff innit. ![]() http://patrickoneill204.fotopic.net/p58004145.html Or even http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/c1694014.html :-) -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/ |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/07/2010 13:24, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:46:34 +0100, "Recliner" wrote: "Matt wrote in message I've never understood why they didn't grab some 1983 stock when they had the chance. Decades newer than what they've got and the single leaf doors wouldn't have been a problem on the IOW. Presumably because at the time, the (at the time, recently refurbished) stock was still fit for purpose, and replacing it with the ex-Jubilee stock would have been a false economy. Perhaps if there were six or seven units of 83 stock available now, then it might be worthwhile, but with 69 stock becoming available soon, I think there's a strong possibility that some of them will head to Grockle- Central, rather than straight to CF Booth's tin-can factory. I presume you mean 1967 stock. I assume that driving it in purely manual mode in short formation won't be a problem? The stock earmarked for the Island Line is either 1972 or 1973 stock. The 1972 stock is almost identical to 1967 stock but has manual diving controls. 67 stock also has manual controls. But it seems that they are set up similar to the Berlin U-Bahn in that the controller and the deadman feature are separate, whereas they are integrated into one on all other underground stock here. 67 stock is also restricted to 25 miles when in manual, although they can modify to run at speed on the Island Line. BTW, has anybody ever thought of increasing the bridge height at St. John's? Is that the only obstacle for them to bring on something like the 62 stock? Anyway, I do hope that they keep some of the 67s around for the public to see after the fact. Maybe at Covent Garden?. |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/07/2010 14:21, Andy wrote:
On 8 July, 13:57, wrote: On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 05:34:03 -0700 (PDT), Matt Forbes wrote: I presume you mean 1967 stock. I assume that driving it in purely manual mode in short formation won't be a problem? I did. Oops! The stock earmarked for the Island Line is either 1972 or 1973 stock. The 1972 stock is almost identical to 1967 stock but has manual diving controls. But when with the 72/73 stock be replaced? I thought that they were up for replacement around 2015, and surely by that time the IoW fleet will be falling to bits. With the ex-Victoria vehicles becoming available somewhat sooner, I'd have thought that they would be used. Sorry, I am just repeating what I have heard and read. I don't know the reasoning behind it, but perhaps the cost of installing manual controls and the extra age of the 1967 stock count against it? Some of the 1972 stock was actually built as late as 1979, so perhaps those are the vehicles that have been selected? That would make them a decade younger than even the last produced 1967 stock. Another consideration is that there are 7 x 4 car units (plus 3 extra cars) of 1972 Mk I stock which were converted (in the late 1980s / early 1990s) to run in the middle of 1967 trains. These units were split in half and each half coupled to 1967 stock half unit. This put the 1967 stock cabs (with the ATO equipment) at the outer ends and the 1972 stock cabs (with the manual equipment) in the middle of an 8 car train. i.e. from DM(67)-T(67)-T(67)-DM(67) + DM(72)-T(72)-T(72)-DM(72) to DM(67)-T(67)-T(72)-exDM(72) + exDM(72)-T(72)-T(67)-DM(67) A possibility is that these units will be the trains for the Island Line, reformed back to 4 car 1972 stock trains. I believe that the driving equipment is still used for shunting when reforming trains in the depot. When/If Island Line gets "new" rolling stock, then what will be of the guards? |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/07/2010 16:12, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:30:52 -0500, wrote: The remaining 1972 stock is mainly on the Bakerloo but some is incorporated in Victoria Line trains with 1967 stock, with the cabs in the middle of trains out of use. A significant part of the 1972 stock, whatever was on the Northern Line before the 1995 stock arrived, has already been scrapped. I wonder why that didn't go to the Island? Left hand, right hand. There was talk of trams, and even the suggestion of a guided busway. Not such a bad idea, as buses could then go on the normal road to serve Ventnor. Cambridgeshire Guided Busway. |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/07/2010 18:42, Steve Fitzgerald wrote:
In message , Andy writes A. Rolling stock for the Island Line will be in a two car formation. Before using replacement stock we will refurbish the units to be fit for the Island Line. Of course, the last web chat was before TfL took back control of Tubelines, which looks like leading to postponement of the new Piccadilly line stock. So SWT might need to come up with a new plan. Quite, I'm hearing that a 'refresh' might now be on the cards to eke them out to 2020. I wonder if SWT will be so keen then? Perhaps keep the 38s running, as the Manx Electric Railway does with its rolling stock? Admittedly, the circumstances between the two networks are different. |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport |