![]() |
Transportation option from London City Airport to Regents Park.
On 27/08/2010 20:34, Robin wrote:
I've arrived back from NY at about that time too. Although having travelled at Mach 2 :) jealousy Who was paying your expenses on that flight? /jealousy We weren't all on expenses. When I was a lad, and you had the Athena tennis girl on your wall, I had Concorde. I couldn't not fly on her. It was a lot, but I don't regret it for a minute. Nor does my wife, every time she meets someone like you! BTW we went out on a 747. PS IIRC there are also not-a red-eye flights from Boston arriving in London c.21:00 And I paid my own fare :(( We did that one once too. I just _hate_ the redeye that I always get for business trips, but that one was a last-whole-family-holiday-before-the-kids-are-too-old trip. Andy |
Transportation option from London City Airport to Regents Park.
Ian wrote on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:45:20 +0100:
In message , Roland Perry writes In message , at 06:18:55 on Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Ian Jelf remarked: I always wanted to fly on a Concorde and sail on the QE2. I never managed the former but did the latter in its penultimate year of doing "real" crossings. I think Goodwood had a package which was Concorde out and QE2 back. Yes, they were quite popular, I think. But rather out of my league in terms of price. By the time we went on the QE2 she was in her last years of sailings and prices were significantly lower! Not an especially luxurious vessel by modern standards but levels of service I've just never encountered elsewhere and a "real ship" as opposed to the floating gin palaces bobbing around the Caribbean pretending to be the Same Thing [TM]. I first travelled to the US on the old Queen Mary. Despite running into a hurricane and having water splashing on the uppermost windows, even sailing steerage (tourist) was amazingly luxurious to an ex-graduate student. This was despite sharing a cabin with three others and salt-water baths (you were provided with a large jug of fresh water for a final rinse down.) Even such baths had a touch of class with one's steward knocking on the door and saying "Sir, your bath is ready." I even managed a very mild shipboard "romance". -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
Transportation option from London City Airport to Regents Park.
In message , at 15:16:12 on Sat, 28 Aug
2010, Clive Page remarked: BA238 dep 8.15am arr 7.40pm AA156 dep 9.10am arr 8.45pm The problem with all these conventional same-day flights is that you lose the whole day in USA, but you also aren't forced to try to make do with very little sleep overnight. I'm surprised these flight times aren't a lot more common, and more popular. Even for the East Coast, you can't turn those planes round and arrive back before midnight (and the further away the USA hub is, the worst it gets). And if you keep the plane overnight in the UK and set off back at 7am the following morning, you won't get back until around 9am, which is quite late to turn round and come back to UK before midnight. So even if that did just work for Boston & NY (and UK rather than somewhere an hour further east), you'd have a very restricted choice of takeoff times, trying to compress too many flights together (remember, there's around 20 a day just London-NY). I've only managed to use them a few times, but each time I've had virtually no jet-lag, whereas I usually suffer for several days. I put it down to the fact that after a whole day travelling you get home, crash straight into bed, and sleep soundly. Jetlag affects different people in different ways. The usual problem flying east is that because you typically set off in the afternoon, it's tempting to stay awake into the 'evening'. Whereas you really need to set a watch to midnight (as it will be roughly, at the destination) and go straight to sleep. -- Roland Perry |
Transportation option from London City Airport to Regents Park.
"Clive Page" wrote in message ... In message , Roland Perry writes BA238 dep 8.15am arr 7.40pm AA156 dep 9.10am arr 8.45pm The problem with all these conventional same-day flights is that you lose the whole day in USA, but you also aren't forced to try to make do with very little sleep overnight. I'm surprised these flight times aren't a lot more common, and more popular. I've only managed to use them a few times, but each time I've had virtually no jet-lag, whereas I usually suffer for several days. I put it down to the fact that after a whole day travelling you get home, crash straight into bed, and sleep soundly. On balance I like the daytime flights, but have found the disadvantage is that I get home in London around 10pm, but it's still only 5pm East coast of the US time, and that I don't feel like sleeping until well after midnight London time Martin |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk