![]() |
|
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
First question: Roughly when did Lower Regent Street get renamed into
Regent Street? Second Question: Is it simply worth firing off a complaint to LUL to ask why the street exit signs haven't been changed? I'm guessing they haven't been changed is they fit in with the décor of the station and would be too expensive or impossible to replace or correct. -- Phil Richards, London, UK 3,600+ railway photos since 1980 at: http://europeanrail.fotopic.net http://britishrail.fotopic.net |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
In article , philrichards1
@blueyonder.co.uk says... First question: Roughly when did Lower Regent Street get renamed into Regent Street? Second Question: Is it simply worth firing off a complaint to LUL to ask why the street exit signs haven't been changed? I'm guessing they haven't been changed is they fit in with the décor of the station and would be too expensive or impossible to replace or correct. Was it ever officially Lower Regent Street? I have various Kelly's Post Office Directories and London atlases of different ages and all seem to show just Regent Street [SW1 south of Piccadilly Circus]. Maybe Mr Jelf knows. |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
In message , Phil Richards
writes First question: Roughly when did Lower Regent Street get renamed into Regent Street? I think it's only ever been a colloquial name, albeit widely used (the Royal Mail database records the "Lower Regent Street Post Office" as being at 11, Regent Street, for instance!). Second Question: Is it simply worth firing off a complaint to LUL to ask why the street exit signs haven't been changed? Why? There are all sorts of signs that refine the exact location of an exit (e.g. from Green Park ... "Piccadilly North"). There is no expectation that a road is named Piccadilly North. -- Paul Terry |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
On Sep 23, 7:38*pm, Ian Jelf wrote: In message , Jim writes In article , philrichards1 says... First question: Roughly when did Lower Regent Street get renamed into Regent Street? Second Question: Is it simply worth firing off a complaint to LUL to ask why the street exit signs haven't been changed? I'm guessing they haven't been changed is they fit in with the décor of the station and would be too expensive or impossible to replace or correct. Was it ever officially Lower Regent Street? I have various Kelly's Post Office Directories and London atlases of different ages and all seem to show just Regent Street [SW1 south of Piccadilly Circus]. Maybe Mr Jelf knows. Goodness, such faith! * I assure you there are many contributors to utl who are far more versed in the capital and its story than me! All I can add to this is to confirm - after a trawl through a fair selection of my London library - that it doesn't ever seem to have ever been called "Lower Regent Street" in any official capacity. * That said, it's a sensible distinction as it's hardly "naturally continuous" with the main part of Regent Street. A couple of other observations that are vaguely related: It's surprising how many examples there are of streets being known by one name but actually being something else. * It's "Strand", not "The Strand" and "Aldwych" not "The Aldwych". But a number of streets do get the definitive article tagged on, in speech at least, to a greater or lesser extent - e.g. The Old Kent Road, The Euston Road, The Edgware Road, The Walworth Road, The Cromwell Road, The Holloway Road, The King's Road, The Mile End Road, The Harrow Road, The East India Dock Road, The Uxbridge Road etc. The section of Baker Street north of Marylebone Road was called "Upper Baker Street" until 1 January 1930. |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
In message , Ian Jelf
writes All I can add to this is to confirm - after a trawl through a fair selection of my London library - that it doesn't ever seem to have ever been called "Lower Regent Street" in any official capacity. That said, it's a sensible distinction as it's hardly "naturally continuous" with the main part of Regent Street. But it is contiguous in street numbers, which I suspect is the defining factor. -- Paul Terry |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Mizter T wrote:
On Sep 23, 7:38*pm, Ian Jelf wrote: It's surprising how many examples there are of streets being known by one name but actually being something else. * It's "Strand", not "The Strand" and "Aldwych" not "The Aldwych". But a number of streets do get the definitive article tagged on, in speech at least, to a greater or lesser extent - e.g. The Old Kent Road, The Euston Road, The Edgware Road, The Walworth Road, The Cromwell Road, The Holloway Road, The King's Road, The Mile End Road, The Harrow Road, The East India Dock Road, The Uxbridge Road etc. Mostly - and ISTR we've talked about this before - ones that are named for a destination. The expression 'the Edgware road' means 'the road to Edgware', in much the same way as you might say 'the radiator pipe' or 'the lamp cable', and i tend to think that this usage came first, with the idea that the road had a name, and that name was 'Edgware Road', coming later. The two exceptions to that rule in your list are The King's Road, where i think an analogous origin exists, and The Cromwell Road, which i cannot explain. A similar principle applies to roads being called 'Road' at all. It's Holloway Road because it goes to Holloway, but Liverpool Street because it doesn't go to Liverpool! Although of course there is a Liverpool Road running up from Angel which also does not go to Liverpool, so this is not an iron rule. Looking at a map reminds me of the interesting case where Hornsey Road, having come down from Hornsey to meet Holloway Road, crosses over it and becomes Hornsey Street. You indeed cannot get to Hornsey on Hornsey Street, only to the tip. tom -- Information is not knowledge. -- Albert Einstein |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
rth.li... On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Mizter T wrote: On Sep 23, 7:38 pm, Ian Jelf wrote: It's surprising how many examples there are of streets being known by one name but actually being something else. It's "Strand", not "The Strand" and "Aldwych" not "The Aldwych". But a number of streets do get the definitive article tagged on, in speech at least, to a greater or lesser extent - e.g. The Old Kent Road, The Euston Road, The Edgware Road, The Walworth Road, The Cromwell Road, The Holloway Road, The King's Road, The Mile End Road, The Harrow Road, The East India Dock Road, The Uxbridge Road etc. Mostly - and ISTR we've talked about this before - ones that are named for a destination. The expression 'the Edgware road' means 'the road to Edgware', in much the same way as you might say 'the radiator pipe' or 'the lamp cable', and i tend to think that this usage came first, with the idea that the road had a name, and that name was 'Edgware Road', coming later. The two exceptions to that rule in your list are The King's Road, where i think an analogous origin exists, and The Cromwell Road, which i cannot explain. A similar principle applies to roads being called 'Road' at all. It's Holloway Road because it goes to Holloway, but Liverpool Street because it doesn't go to Liverpool! Although of course there is a Liverpool Road running up from Angel which also does not go to Liverpool, so this is not an iron rule. Looking at a map reminds me of the interesting case where Hornsey Road, having come down from Hornsey to meet Holloway Road, crosses over it and becomes Hornsey Street. You indeed cannot get to Hornsey on Hornsey Street, only to the tip. tom -- Information is not knowledge. -- Albert Einstein But I have recently been in contact with an American author over the use of "THE high street" as against his "main street", and why. Indeed, why? MaxB |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
On Sep 23, 10:25*pm, Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Mizter T wrote: On Sep 23, 7:38*pm, Ian Jelf wrote: It's surprising how many examples there are of streets being known by one name but actually being something else. * It's "Strand", not "The Strand" and "Aldwych" not "The Aldwych". But a number of streets do get the definitive article tagged on, in speech at least, to a greater or lesser extent - e.g. The Old Kent Road, The Euston Road, The Edgware Road, The Walworth Road, The Cromwell Road, The Holloway Road, The King's Road, The Mile End Road, The Harrow Road, The East India Dock Road, The Uxbridge Road etc. Mostly - and ISTR we've talked about this before - ones that are named for a destination. The expression 'the Edgware road' means 'the road to Edgware', in much the same way as you might say 'the radiator pipe' or 'the lamp cable', and i tend to think that this usage came first, with the idea that the road had a name, and that name was 'Edgware Road', coming later. I agree with all of that - indeed I might have had a stab at a similar explanation in my earlier post if I'd had an extra moment or two. (I probably shouldn't really have capitalised the the's [1] in my list but I think I was just ramming home The point.) [1] Trying to pluralise "the" will always end in tears, I know... The two exceptions to that rule in your list are The King's Road, where i think an analogous origin exists, and The Cromwell Road, which i cannot explain. The first is easy - it's Charles II's. 'The' Cromwell Road is indeed the odd one out - I couldn't and still can't think of another similar example. It's a major thoroughfare of course - part of the Great West Road (aka the A4) - so perhaps that encourages the use of the definitive article (not to say that such usage is anything like universal either). I can't imagine it's really out of any reverence for Old Ironsides himself though. A similar principle applies to roads being called 'Road' at all. It's Holloway Road because it goes to Holloway, but Liverpool Street because it doesn't go to Liverpool! Although of course there is a Liverpool Road running up from Angel which also does not go to Liverpool, so this is not an iron rule. The 'Road' bit isn't an iron rule, but if it's 'Road' and it (eventually) leads one to its namesake then I reckon it's a decent rule of thumb, if not an iron rule. Looking at a map reminds me of the interesting case where Hornsey Road, having come down from Hornsey to meet Holloway Road, crosses over it and becomes Hornsey Street. You indeed cannot get to Hornsey on Hornsey Street, only to the tip. aka recycling and reuse centre, or some such! -- Information is not knowledge. -- Albert Einstein But it is power. (Unless old Albert thought otherwise?) |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
On 2010\09\23 20:12, Paul Terry wrote:
In message , Ian Jelf writes All I can add to this is to confirm - after a trawl through a fair selection of my London library - that it doesn't ever seem to have ever been called "Lower Regent Street" in any official capacity. That said, it's a sensible distinction as it's hardly "naturally continuous" with the main part of Regent Street. But it is contiguous in street numbers, which I suspect is the defining factor. Although sometimes different roads have contiguous house numbers, such as Saint Pauls Avenue / Chapter Road, and Harrow Road / Wembley High Road / Harrow Road. |
Piccadilly Circus/Lower Regent Street
On 2010\09\24 01:05, Mizter T wrote:
On Sep 23, 10:25 pm, Tom wrote: On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Mizter T wrote: On Sep 23, 7:38 pm, Ian wrote: It's surprising how many examples there are of streets being known by one name but actually being something else. It's "Strand", not "The Strand" and "Aldwych" not "The Aldwych". But a number of streets do get the definitive article tagged on, in speech at least, to a greater or lesser extent - e.g. The Old Kent Road, The Euston Road, The Edgware Road, The Walworth Road, The Cromwell Road, The Holloway Road, The King's Road, The Mile End Road, The Harrow Road, The East India Dock Road, The Uxbridge Road etc. Mostly - and ISTR we've talked about this before - ones that are named for a destination. The expression 'the Edgware road' means 'the road to Edgware', in much the same way as you might say 'the radiator pipe' or 'the lamp cable', and i tend to think that this usage came first, with the idea that the road had a name, and that name was 'Edgware Road', coming later. I agree with all of that - indeed I might have had a stab at a similar explanation in my earlier post if I'd had an extra moment or two. (I probably shouldn't really have capitalised the the's [1] in my list but I think I was just ramming home The point.) [1] Trying to pluralise "the" will always end in tears, I know... The two exceptions to that rule in your list are The King's Road, where i think an analogous origin exists, and The Cromwell Road, which i cannot explain. The first is easy - it's Charles II's. 'The' Cromwell Road is indeed the odd one out - I couldn't and still can't think of another similar example. The North Circular Road, The Westway, The Western Avenue, The Eastern Avenue, The Great North Road, The Great North Way. "Pop Goes The Weasel" contains the line "Up and down the City Road", although that may have been contrived for scansion purposes and doesn't really sound right to me. Although of course there is a Liverpool Road running up from Angel which also does not go to Liverpool, so this is not an iron rule. It does go towards Liverpool. I believe that the original Great North Road ran down Friern Barnet Lane, Colney Hatch Lane, Crouch End Broadway and Hornsey Road... Liverpool Road seems to be a continuation of this line, so will have been the road from London to Liverpool at one point. The 'Road' bit isn't an iron rule, but if it's 'Road' and it (eventually) leads one to its namesake then I reckon it's a decent rule of thumb, if not an iron rule. "Way" seems to work just as well as "Road"... The Hendon Way, The Watford Way, The Purley Way. "Lane" seems not to work though... "The Finchley Lane" and "The Hendon Lane" sound wrong. This road is called "Hendon Lane" when it's in Finchley and become "Finchley Lane" as soon as it crosses into Hendon, so it's definitely a named-after-destination road. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:09 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk