![]() |
|
Northern line lift at King's Cross
The lift from the old Tube Ticket Hall to the Northern line is now
open at King's Cross. It travels from level "-1" to level "-3", and only has these options. But when the lift gets about half way between them, or perhaps nearer to "-3", there is a tunnel on the west side (that's the side you enter the lift on at level "-1" and the opposite side to the exit at level "-3"). The tunnel is all lined properly like other public areas of the station. It curves to the right (the north). Where does it go, what is it for, and why is it lined line a public area? |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 25/09/10 10:53, lonelytraveller wrote:
The lift from the old Tube Ticket Hall to the Northern line is now open at King's Cross. I've been wondering how they're going to manage the signage for this. Presumably they'll have to remove the big "no access to the Northern line" banner at the Tube Ticket Hall -- but if they do that the lift will be rather overwhelmed, assuming it's still the only access to the Northern line from that ticket hall. -roy |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 25 Sep, 11:42, Roy Badami wrote:
On 25/09/10 10:53, lonelytraveller wrote: The lift from the old Tube Ticket Hall to the Northern line is now open at King's Cross. I've been wondering how they're going to manage the signage for this. Presumably they'll have to remove the big "no access to the Northern line" banner at the Tube Ticket Hall -- but if they do that the lift will be rather overwhelmed, assuming it's still the only access to the Northern line from that ticket hall. The short escalators were working in both directions when I was there on Thursday, so it looks like there is access to the Northern Line that way for now. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
"MIG" wrote in message ... The short escalators were working in both directions when I was there on Thursday, so it looks like there is access to the Northern Line that way for now. One of the early TfL announcements about this last lift did say that the Northern line escalator restrictions were for the duration of building the lift. Was the lower access to the lift closed off by hoardings? Paul S |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 25 Sep, 17:14, "Paul Scott" wrote:
"MIG" wrote in message ... The short escalators were working in both directions when I was there on Thursday, so it looks like there is access to the Northern Line that way for now. One of the early TfL announcements about this last lift did say that the Northern line escalator restrictions were for the duration of building the lift. *Was the lower access to the lift closed off by hoardings? Paul S I didn't notice any more or less hoardings than usual, but I was distracted by lateness at the time. I certainly didn't notice a lift, but I can miss the most obvious at times. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 25 Sep, 21:45, MIG wrote:
I didn't notice any more or less hoardings than usual, but I was distracted by lateness at the time. *I certainly didn't notice a lift, but I can miss the most obvious at times. Next time you're there, take the lift. If you go in from the platforms, face the opposite way, if you go in from the ticket hall, turn round and face the doors you came in through. Half way through the lift journey, you'll see the passage. Then maybe you might have an idea what it might be for, or where it goes, or why its tiled like a public passage. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 26/09/2010 09:34, lonelytraveller wrote:
Half way through the lift journey, you'll see the passage. Then maybe you might have an idea what it might be for, or where it goes, or why its tiled like a public passage. Not having sampled the Northern Line lift yet I can't comment authoritatively, but could the "intermediate" level be one of the concourse between the Piccadilly and Northern Lines or a link to the (in)famous "SMILE" subway to Pentonville Road? Cheers, Barry |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 26/09/10 21:46, Barry Salter wrote:
or a link to the (in)famous "SMILE" subway to Pentonville Road? What's the SMILE subway? The only hit Google brings up is a reference to Thameslink -- is that the passageway from the old Thameslink station to the Victoria and Piccadilly lines? -roy |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On Sep 26, 11:20*pm, Roy Badami wrote: On 26/09/10 21:46, Barry Salter wrote: *or a link to the (in)famous "SMILE" subway to Pentonville Road? What's the SMILE subway? *The only hit Google brings up is a reference to Thameslink -- is that the passageway from the old Thameslink station to the Victoria and Piccadilly lines? Yes - the old KX Thameslink station's entrance on Pentonville Road is still open these days albeit weekdays only between (IIRC) 7am and 8pm (responsibility for it passed from FCC Thameslink to LU). The Smile passageway is so called because... http://www.flickr.com/photos/67655316@N00/225943955/ |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 26 Sep, 21:46, Barry Salter wrote:
On 26/09/2010 09:34, lonelytraveller wrote: Half way through the lift journey, you'll see the passage. Then maybe you might have an idea what it might be for, or where it goes, or why its tiled like a public passage. Not having sampled the Northern Line lift yet I can't comment authoritatively, but could the "intermediate" level be one of the concourse between the Piccadilly and Northern Lines or a link to the (in)famous "SMILE" subway to Pentonville Road? Cheers, Barry Its possible certainly, but it does head west and then turn north, so its not really going in a sensible direction for that (the Piccadilly concourse and SMILE subway are both to the east of the lift . |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
In message
, at 00:24:07 on Mon, 27 Sep 2010, lonelytraveller remarked: Half way through the lift journey, you'll see the passage. Then maybe you might have an idea what it might be for, or where it goes, or why its tiled like a public passage. Not having sampled the Northern Line lift yet I can't comment authoritatively, but could the "intermediate" level be one of the concourse between the Piccadilly and Northern Lines or a link to the (in)famous "SMILE" subway to Pentonville Road? Its possible certainly, but it does head west and then turn north, so its not really going in a sensible direction for that (the Piccadilly concourse and SMILE subway are both to the east of the lift . A better indication of depth would help a lot. Here are some numbers which might help (all of them "below average street level"): Top of new Northern lift, in old booking hall lower level: 5m Bottom of new Northern lift, platform level: 27.25m Piccadilly concourse: 21.5m Which gives a drop of 22.25m, with the Piccadilly concourse 74% of the way down. The subway to Pentonville Road wanders around a bit, but isn't anywhere near this new lift (and also on the wrong side). I'd guess it was about 15m below street level, which is 45% of the way down the new lift shaft. The old Northern Line lift shafts are to the west of the new lift, and according to Clive Feather's website there is an older emergency lift (which is most likely to be in that vicinity). I wonder if this is a connecting passageway to that emergency lift. -- Roland Perry |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... The old Northern Line lift shafts are to the west of the new lift, and according to Clive Feather's website there is an older emergency lift (which is most likely to be in that vicinity). I wonder if this is a connecting passageway to that emergency lift. It isn't at all unlikely that there are unsigned links for use by the maintenace staff of the fire brigade. Who knows what is provided for at lower levels connected to the surface emergency access - I don't recall ever seeing details of the 'back of house' at lower levels in any of the many drawings I've found, or have been linked to here... Paul S |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
Mizter T wrote on 27 September 2010 01:36:36 ...
On Sep 26, 11:20 pm, Roy wrote: On 26/09/10 21:46, Barry Salter wrote: or a link to the (in)famous "SMILE" subway to Pentonville Road? What's the SMILE subway? The only hit Google brings up is a reference to Thameslink -- is that the passageway from the old Thameslink station to the Victoria and Piccadilly lines? Yes - the old KX Thameslink station's entrance on Pentonville Road is still open these days albeit weekdays only between (IIRC) 7am and 8pm (responsibility for it passed from FCC Thameslink to LU). The Smile passageway is so called because... http://www.flickr.com/photos/67655316@N00/225943955/ Because ....? -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 27 Sep, 17:17, Roland Perry wrote:
The old Northern Line lift shafts are to the west of the new lift, and according to Clive Feather's website there is an older emergency lift (which is most likely to be in that vicinity). I wonder if this is a connecting passageway to that emergency lift. -- Roland Perry That's plausible, but why is it tiled and lit like a public area, rather than a rough finish like an emergency access passage? Also, what would be the point of a passage connecting two lift shafts together, when its already fairly easy to get between the lifts at platform level, and surface level? |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
In message
, at 12:29:17 on Mon, 27 Sep 2010, lonelytraveller remarked: The old Northern Line lift shafts are to the west of the new lift, and according to Clive Feather's website there is an older emergency lift (which is most likely to be in that vicinity). I wonder if this is a connecting passageway to that emergency lift. That's plausible, but why is it tiled and lit like a public area, rather than a rough finish like an emergency access passage? I don't know. How long is the passage? I've asked some other questions, tacked onto your initial posting. Also, what would be the point of a passage connecting two lift shafts together, when its already fairly easy to get between the lifts at platform level, and surface level? Perhaps one or other of the (upper/lower) access points to the emergency lift will be obscured by some other of the current works. Although one might imagine that the new public lift could entirely obsolete the emergency one. -- Roland Perry |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
In message
, at 02:53:47 on Sat, 25 Sep 2010, lonelytraveller remarked: when the lift gets about half way between them, or perhaps nearer to "-3", there is a tunnel on the west side (that's the side you enter the lift on at level "-1" When you enter the lift, are the escalators behind you, or are they directly 'ahead' of you? Or to the side? and the opposite side to the exit at level "-3"). When the doors open on -3, are the majority of the platforms directly ahead of you (ignoring any kinks in short connecting passages), or are they 'behind' you? -- Roland Perry |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
In message
, at 01:34:37 on Sun, 26 Sep 2010, lonelytraveller remarked: Next time you're there, take the lift. If you go in from the platforms, face the opposite way, if you go in from the ticket hall, turn round and face the doors you came in through. That suggests you need to "about-face" whichever end of the lift you entered. So are these three doors all facing the same way, just at different heights? -- Roland Perry |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Paul Scott wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... The old Northern Line lift shafts are to the west of the new lift, and according to Clive Feather's website there is an older emergency lift (which is most likely to be in that vicinity). I wonder if this is a connecting passageway to that emergency lift. It isn't at all unlikely that there are unsigned links for use by the maintenace staff of the fire brigade. Who knows what is provided for at lower levels connected to the surface emergency access - I don't recall ever seeing details of the 'back of house' at lower levels in any of the many drawings I've found, or have been linked to here... Doesn't Euston famously have some whole unused levels in its stack? And i don't mean the parcel depot above the platforms! tom -- The cause? Thatcher again. Not for any specific reasons but she's always the root of every problem in Britain today. -- Mike |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 27 Sep, 21:34, Roland Perry wrote:
That's plausible, but why is it tiled and lit like a public area, rather than a rough finish like an emergency access passage? I don't know. How long is the passage? I've asked some other questions, tacked onto your initial posting. The visible part is about as long as the eastern northern line concourse. Also, what would be the point of a passage connecting two lift shafts together, when its already fairly easy to get between the lifts at platform level, and surface level? Perhaps one or other of the (upper/lower) access points to the emergency lift will be obscured by some other of the current works. Although one might imagine that the new public lift could entirely obsolete the emergency one. I still can't see why going up one lift half way, along a passage, and then up the other lift, would ever be better than just going all the way up one of the lifts? Next time you're there, take the lift. If you go in from the platforms, face the opposite way, if you go in from the ticket hall, turn round and face the doors you came in through. That suggests you need to "about-face" whichever end of the lift you entered. So are these three doors all facing the same way, just at different heights? No. If you go in from the platforms, face the opposite way from the door you came in through. If you go in from the ticket hall, turn round and face the SAME way as the door you came in through. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 27 Sep, 21:39, Roland Perry wrote:
When you enter the lift, are the escalators behind you, or are they directly 'ahead' of you? Or to the side? Behind you. and the opposite side to the exit at level "-3"). When the doors open on -3, are the majority of the platforms directly ahead of you (ignoring any kinks in short connecting passages), or are they 'behind' you? Most of the platform is behind you (to your left and right). You are facing the east end of the platforms, looking at the escalators leading to the piccadilly line. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 28 Sep, 07:58, lonelytraveller
wrote: On 27 Sep, 21:39, Roland Perry wrote: When you enter the lift, are the escalators behind you, or are they directly 'ahead' of you? Or to the side? Behind you. That is, behind you if you enter from "-3", ahead of you if you enter from "-1". |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
In message
, at 23:58:22 on Mon, 27 Sep 2010, lonelytraveller remarked: When you enter the lift, are the escalators behind you, or are they directly 'ahead' of you? Or to the side? Behind you. So you've done a u-turn since going through the barriers, and are now facing west... If you go in from the ticket hall, turn round and face the SAME way as the door you came in through. So now you are facing east, which means the passage you are looking at heads east (which is away from the original lifts, and toward Pentonville Road). and the opposite side to the exit at level "-3"). When the doors open on -3, are the majority of the platforms directly ahead of you (ignoring any kinks in short connecting passages), or are they 'behind' you? Most of the platform is behind you (to your left and right). You are facing the east end of the platforms, looking at the escalators leading to the piccadilly line. That's consistent; once again you are looking east (because the new lift is at the eastern end of the platforms). Unfortunately, in your original posting you said it was looking west :( -- Roland Perry |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
In message
, at 23:56:45 on Mon, 27 Sep 2010, lonelytraveller remarked: On 27 Sep, 21:34, Roland Perry wrote: That's plausible, but why is it tiled and lit like a public area, rather than a rough finish like an emergency access passage? I don't know. How long is the passage? I've asked some other questions, tacked onto your initial posting. The visible part is about as long as the eastern northern line concourse. I have no idea what that is (and therefore how long that is), sorry. For example, are we talking more or less than the distance between the platform faces? At the end, does it disappear to the left, or the right? Also, what would be the point of a passage connecting two lift shafts together, when its already fairly easy to get between the lifts at platform level, and surface level? Perhaps one or other of the (upper/lower) access points to the emergency lift will be obscured by some other of the current works. Although one might imagine that the new public lift could entirely obsolete the emergency one. I still can't see why going up one lift half way, along a passage, and then up the other lift, would ever be better than just going all the way up one of the lifts? Nor can I, but it was the best explanation we had, combined with a general feeling that the expense of constructing these facilities usually means there's a good reason for everything (even if we don't immediately know what it is). However, we now seem to have cleared up the confusion between "facing the opposite way", and "turning round" (which at first sight are the same activity)... and therefore the new passage would seem to head east and not west. That is much more consistent with being a link to the other new lifts which are on the reconstructed Pentonville Road passage, and (if they also have a "secret doorway") would link all three of the new deep lifts together for emergency purposes. -- Roland Perry |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
"Mizter T" wrote in message ... Yes - the old KX Thameslink station's entrance on Pentonville Road is still open these days albeit weekdays only between (IIRC) 7am and 8pm (responsibility for it passed from FCC Thameslink to LU). The Smile passageway is so called because... http://www.flickr.com/photos/67655316@N00/225943955/ Surely one of the most annoying design features anywhere on the network - I can think of few things which would do more to induce rage, were I in the middle of a difficult journey, than huge lettering exhorting me to smile :-) Martin |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
The Smile passageway is so called because... http://www.flickr.com/photos/67655316@N00/225943955/ Because ....? Because, I assume (although it is not incredibly easy to read in that photograph), the design on the inside of the tunnel is actually letering that says "SMILE" -roy |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 28 Sep, 22:59, "Martin Rich" wrote:
"Mizter T" wrote in message ... Yes - the old KX Thameslink station's entrance on Pentonville Road is still open these days albeit weekdays only between (IIRC) 7am and 8pm (responsibility for it passed from FCC Thameslink to LU). The Smile passageway is so called because... http://www.flickr.com/photos/67655316@N00/225943955/ Surely one of the most annoying design features anywhere on the network - I can think of few things which would do more to induce rage, were I in the middle of a difficult journey, than huge lettering exhorting me to smile :-) Martin There's always the scrolling displays outside stations, that one only ever gets to see when locked out due to disruption, saying "there is a good service on all London Underground Lines". |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
Roy Badami wrote on 28 September 2010 23:13:13 ...
The Smile passageway is so called because... http://www.flickr.com/photos/67655316@N00/225943955/ Because ....? Because, I assume (although it is not incredibly easy to read in that photograph), the design on the inside of the tunnel is actually letering that says "SMILE" Oh, I see! I thought the splodges of colour were national flags or something; didn't realise they were letters. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 29/09/10 00:04, Richard J. wrote:
Oh, I see! I thought the splodges of colour were national flags or something; didn't realise they were letters. Of course, that does invite the question: "why does the lettering say 'SMILE'?" Perhaps it says 'SMILE' because this is the SMILE subway -- if so, we're no closer to knowing why it's so called than before... -roy |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 29 Sep, 00:10, Roy Badami wrote:
On 29/09/10 00:04, Richard J. wrote: Oh, I see! I thought the splodges of colour were national flags or something; didn't realise they were letters. Of course, that does invite the question: "why does the lettering say 'SMILE'?" Perhaps it says 'SMILE' because this is the SMILE subway -- if so, we're no closer to knowing why it's so called than before... South Midland Inner London Electrics |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On Sep 29, 12:04*am, "Richard J." wrote: Roy Badami wrote on 28 September 2010 23:13:13 ... The Smile passageway is so called because... http://www.flickr.com/photos/67655316@N00/225943955/ Because ....? Because, I assume (although it is not incredibly easy to read in that photograph), the design on the inside of the tunnel is actually letering that says "SMILE" Oh, I see! *I thought the splodges of colour were national flags or something; didn't realise they were letters. And I thought you were asking me *why* it said "smile"! There's a rather dark side to the passageway though, which doesn't really match up with it's smiley façade. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 29/09/10 14:36, Mizter T wrote:
There's a rather dark side to the passageway though, which doesn't really match up with it's smiley façade. What kind of dark side? Rather more dreary decor? Dangerous to walk down at night? Literally dark, as in lacking illumination? I only ever used the Kings Cross Thameslink station once or twice, and I never used the SMILE passageway. -roy |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 29 Sep, 16:28, Roy Badami wrote:
On 29/09/10 14:36, Mizter T wrote: There's a rather dark side to the passageway though, which doesn't really match up with it's smiley façade. What kind of dark side? *Rather more dreary decor? *Dangerous to walk down at night? *Literally dark, as in lacking illumination? I only ever used the Kings Cross Thameslink station once or twice, and I never used the SMILE passageway. * * *-roy It reminds me of Moorgate and Old Street on being taken over by BR. LU stations always seemed to be warm and bright, but give the same basic kind of space to BR and they seemed to be able to suck all light and warmth out of it. I've never really been able to work out how they do it, but I guess it goes back to its BR legacy. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 29 Sep, 14:36, Mizter T wrote:
There's a rather dark side to the passageway though, which doesn't really match up with it's smiley façade. Because of the Kings Cross fire? That really was one of the most unfortuate aspects of the disaster, quite apart from the personnel and organisational failings uncovered by Fennell. For background, at the time of day that the Kings Cross fire happened the passageway was closed and the Bostwick gates to it from the Piccadilly/Victoria line platforms locked. This was because the Midland City line (subsequently Thameslink) station was at that time closed in the evenings for the station to be upgraded and overall roof constructed. If the passage had been open (or had been fitted with the emergency unlocking devices that have become standard since the fire), then it's quite possible that many of the passengers from the tube platforms would have been evacuated (or evacuated themselves) that way rather than being directed up the Victoria line escalators towards the impending flashover. Having said that I don't think anyone could have predicted just how violently the fire would erupt from the Piccadilly escalator shaft. ISTR that eventually - 30-60 minutes after the flashover - someone was finally found who could unlock the Bostwick gates and allow trapped people to be brought to the surface through the Pentonville Road ticket hall. Although the 'SMILE' panelling was part of the original 1981 KX Midland City station construction, not installed after the fire for the Thameslink station rebuilding. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Roy Badami wrote:
On 29/09/10 14:36, Mizter T wrote: There's a rather dark side to the passageway though, which doesn't really match up with it's smiley fa?ade. What kind of dark side? The outside. tom -- so if you hear a chaffinch out on the pull attempting a severely off-key version of "Sabotage" by the Beastie Boys then you're not actually going mad. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
In message , at 16:28:54 on Wed, 29 Sep
2010, Roy Badami remarked: I only ever used the Kings Cross Thameslink station once or twice, and I never used the SMILE passageway. I almost always used it as a way from the Thameslink platforms to the main station. Avoids the weather, and the strange creatures of the night who lurk in that part of town. -- Roland Perry |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 29/09/10 18:01, Brian A60K wrote:
For background, at the time of day that the Kings Cross fire happened the passageway was closed and the Bostwick gates to it from the Piccadilly/Victoria line platforms locked. This was because the Midland City line (subsequently Thameslink) station was at that time closed in the evenings for the station to be upgraded and overall roof constructed. Ah, thank you for that context. I knew that some passengers (assisted by a member of staff, IIRC) attempted to evacuate via a route that was blocked by a locked gate, but I didn't know the actual location. -roy |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 30 Sep, 00:44, Mizter T wrote:
Thanks - that was a question I wanted answered, i.e. whether the 'Smile' design came before or after the fire (as if it had come afterwards, then I think further questions as to the appropriateness of this motif could have been asked). FWIW the Fennell report appears to state that this passageway was constructed a little later than you suggest, in "1983/4". There's truth in both dates, curiously enough! The major construction work was largely complete in 1981 (a friend of mine had a pub with a bird's eye view down to the KX Midland City station site), but because of the industrial relations issues caused by the proposed DOO on the Class 317s the service was delayed for somewhere around a year, with the old trains soldiering on and the nice new electrics sitting in the sidings. I believe it was May 1983 that the electric service finally started, despite the infrastructure having been there for around 18 months. Incidentally, I read recently that the KX Midland City tunnel made use of tunnel segments ordered for the Jubilee line extension (abortive GLC version), which explained the 1976 or 1977 dates stamped on them that I saw (and puzzled about) when part of the tunnel was retiled as part of the Northern Ticket Hall project. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 28 Sep, 08:28, Roland Perry wrote:
I have no idea what that is (and therefore how long that is), sorry. For example, are we talking more or less than the distance between the platform faces? The visible portion is slightly shorter than the distance between the platform faces of the northern line. At the end, does it disappear to the left, or the right? To the right (the north) However, we now seem to have cleared up the confusion between "facing the opposite way", and "turning round" (which at first sight are the same activity)... and therefore the new passage would seem to head east and not west. That is much more consistent with being a link to the other new lifts which are on the reconstructed Pentonville Road passage, and (if they also have a "secret doorway") would link all three of the new deep lifts together for emergency purposes. No, it faces west. All phrases such as "facing the opposite way" and "turning round" should be interpreted so that you face west at the end. Go there yourself, and you'll see. The passage faces west. Its a physical thing, and no amount of argument about semantics will ever change the way it actually physically faces. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
On 30 Sep, 00:35, Mizter T wrote:
On Sep 29, 4:28*pm, Roy Badami wrote: On 29/09/10 14:36, Mizter T wrote: There's a rather dark side to the passageway though, which doesn't really match up with it's smiley façade. What kind of dark side? *Rather more dreary decor? *Dangerous to walk down at night? *Literally dark, as in lacking illumination? I was a bit hazy on the details, so I've just taken the opportunity to look at an authoritative source - the Fennell Report into the King's Cross fire. This is available on the Railways Archive website as a PDF (which is text searchable) - see: http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/eventsummary.php?eventID=138 What follows is just my interpretation based on a pretty quick and distinctly incomplete scan through of the full report, so please don't take it as gospel. On the night of the fire, one member of LU staff redirected some passengers to this passageway leading to the Midland City exit so as to escape from the fire, but unbeknown to him it was blocked by locked gates - these passengers then returned and some understandably gave him some stick. Why didn't they direct anyone to the northern line's emergency stairs? They still seem to be there (behind aluminium slats on a narrow door on each of the platforms), even now after all this building work. And they would have lead outside the ticket hall area back then. Or the piccadilly line stairs (assuming they are still there after the victoria line was built - the lobby is certainly still there).? What's the point of having emergency stairs if they are ignored when there's an emergency. |
Northern line lift at King's Cross
In message
, at 03:55:18 on Sun, 10 Oct 2010, lonelytraveller remarked: I have no idea what that is (and therefore how long that is), sorry. For example, are we talking more or less than the distance between the platform faces? The visible portion is slightly shorter than the distance between the platform faces of the northern line. At the end, does it disappear to the left, or the right? To the right (the north) However, we now seem to have cleared up the confusion between "facing the opposite way", and "turning round" (which at first sight are the same activity)... and therefore the new passage would seem to head east and not west. That is much more consistent with being a link to the other new lifts which are on the reconstructed Pentonville Road passage, and (if they also have a "secret doorway") would link all three of the new deep lifts together for emergency purposes. No, it faces west. All phrases such as "facing the opposite way" and "turning round" should be interpreted so that you face west at the end. Go there yourself, and you'll see. The passage faces west. Its a physical thing, and no amount of argument about semantics will ever change the way it actually physically faces. Please excuse me if your description: "If you go in from the ticket hall, turn round and face the SAME way as the door you came in through." ....and your later clarification that when you go in that way you have your back to the escalators and are therefore facing west, confused me. Because if you turned round and faced the door you came through, you'd be facing east. That's not semantics. -- Roland Perry |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:09 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk