Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010\09\28 11:57, Walter Briscoe wrote:
Piccadilly: EW except NS at Finsbury Park Unless it's changed recently, it was N/S at every station from Cockfosters to Russell Square, and N/W at Holborn (the Aldwych platform was called southbound from Holborn). Incidentally, my spell-checker tries to turn Cockfosters into, well, French MEPs. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Sep, 09:01, David Hansen wrote
That would be a problem, though not a great one. Two of the larger exceptions down south to up and down referring to London are South Wales, where up is up the valley, and former Midland Railway lines where up is towards Derby. Thanks, that's very interesting. Did the Midland definitions of up/ down remain after grouping, indeed if you travel from Trent jk to StPan, are you still heading down? Wasn't the former MS&L line was "up" into Cleethorpes. Rgds/Ted |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 04:48:57 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be tedjrr
wrote this:- Did the Midland definitions of up/down remain after grouping, They remain to this day. Changing designation would be a fraught task, I can see why it would be put off even if it was thought to be a good idea. Lines presumably change designation somewhere in Derby Midland station. Perhaps there is some sort of object which marks the spot. Also some designations might not be logical with the current railway map. I don't know if it happens anywhere, but the designations may have been set originally via a route which is now closed, such as the former route from London to Nottingham via Corby and Melton Mowbray. indeed if you travel from Trent jk to StPan, are you still heading down? I should have been more explicit. Up to Derby applied to lines not going to London. The result of this is that a train from Birmingham approaching Derby is running on the Up Main, while a train from London, which will end up at the same platform, is running on the Down Main. Both will depart on the Down Main, according to my 1980 Quail map. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000...#pt3-pb3-l1g54 |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"Graham Harrison" wrote: "Graeme" wrote in message ... In message "Graham Harrison" wrote: On the "Main Line" trains are usually referred to as going "up" or "down" by the staff. However, it seems that, even "London Transport" refer to Underground lines by their geographic direction; it's not just the public signs that say "Northbound" etc. Is that correct? Did they ever use up/down? I've seen it suggested that the reason for using "Southbound" etc. is related to the American involvement in the building of some of the tube lines; comments? The main line use of up/down is not applicable to the UndergrounD so the geographic system is more appropriate. I believe such useage predates Yerkes involvement. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/ Yes, when I read it I did think that (a) up/down wasn't appropriate and (b) what happened before Yerkes. But I also wondered about the Metropolitan given its' grand plans and whether the line through Rickmansworth was ever up/down? The brief history of the Metropolitan Line published in 1973 makes no mention of the terms. Neither does the contemporary How the Underground Works in its description of four tracking of the line north(!) of Harrow on the Hill. Negative evidence I know. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/ |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 13:15:36 on
Tue, 28 Sep 2010, David Hansen remarked: indeed if you travel from Trent jk to StPan, are you still heading down? I should have been more explicit. Up to Derby applied to lines not going to London. The result of this is that a train from Birmingham approaching Derby is running on the Up Main, while a train from London, which will end up at the same platform, is running on the Down Main. Both will depart on the Down Main, according to my 1980 Quail map. Assuming the Birmingham train is going to Sheffield, perhaps. If instead it heads for Long Eaton and Nottingham, presumably that's up to start with, then down past Trent Junction? -- Roland Perry |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:27:34 +0100 someone who may be Roland Perry
wrote this:- Assuming the Birmingham train is going to Sheffield, perhaps. If instead it heads for Long Eaton and Nottingham, presumably that's up to start with, then down past Trent Junction? According to my 1980 Quail it will arrive at Derby on the Up Main, change direction, depart on the Up Main, and from Trent East Junction run on the Down main, then the Down Fast to Nottingham. However, the designations may have been changed now, BR having a fetish at the time for "fast" lines rather than "main" or "through" lines as they used to be called in some places. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000...#pt3-pb3-l1g54 |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:40:30 +0100
Steve Fitzgerald ] wrote: Regarding an earlier comment about why the Picc uses east-west when it 'patently isn't'. Well it's safety; the Picc has been defined as an Oh BS. It was perfectly safe using north & southbound on the line north of kings X for 100 years. Why suddenly (apart from nanny state elf-n-softies) is is suddenly unsafe? eastbound but it would be silly to keep changing the references as that would just cause confusion. Once we know which is the eastbound or westbound road it doesn't matter which actual direction it goes; we could call them direction Fred and direction John for all it matters as long as everyone knows what we're talking about. Then why not do as almost every other metro system does and just use the termini as the direction? B2003 |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:57:58 +0100
Walter Briscoe wrote: From a customer perspective, all Piccadilly platforms are Eastbound or From people who live in the area its north and south. LU can use whatever compass points they want , no one will take any notice. Waterloo & City: NS This line uses Waterloo and Bank as its direction of travel. Which makes a lot more sense IMO. B2003 |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:50 +0100
Basil Jet wrote: This line uses Waterloo and Bank as its direction of travel. Which makes a lot more sense IMO. Really? Not Waterloo and City? I haven't used it for years but I'm pretty sure it said "To Bank" or something like that tho perhaps it does say "City". At any rate , it doesn't use compass directions. B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More on ''Up/down/northbound/westbound?'' | London Transport | |||
Up/down/northbound/westbound? | London Transport | |||
Westbound Circle Line at Edgware Road | London Transport | |||
Thameslink northbound service to Blackfriars this morning (Fri 25th Feb) | London Transport | |||
Slow northbound picc into Kings X | London Transport |