Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/13879.aspx
From today one can no longer dial a London number to get London travel information, one has to dial the new 0843 222 1234 number - 0843 numbers of course cost more, from a BT line that's 5p a minute (plus a "call set up fee" aka connection fee of 10.9p), but the real sting is for those who call from mobiles - e.g. from an O2 contract phone it will cost 20p/min, or an O2 PAYG phone it'll cost 25p/min. And UIVMM the 0843 number range is not included within any inclusive allowances offered by any landline telco (BT, Virgin, Talk Talk etc), let alone any offered by a mobile provider. A regressive step, IMHO. One trusts that TfL will retain ownership of ABBey 1234 nonetheless (you never know, it could be put back into use in the future). As of this morning if you call the 7222 1234 number you'll hear a recorded message directing you to dial the new 0843 number. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Oct, 08:45, "Mizter T" wrote:
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/13879.aspx From today one can no longer dial a London number to get London travel information, one has to dial the new 0843 222 1234 number - 0843 numbers of course cost more, from a BT line that's 5p a minute (plus a "call set up fee" aka connection fee of 10.9p), but the real sting is for those who call from mobiles - e.g. from an O2 contract phone it will cost 20p/min, or an O2 PAYG phone it'll cost 25p/min. And UIVMM the 0843 number range is not included within any inclusive allowances offered by any landline telco (BT, Virgin, Talk Talk etc), let alone any offered by a mobile provider. A regressive step, IMHO. One trusts that TfL will retain ownership of ABBey 1234 nonetheless (you never know, it could be put back into use in the future). As of this morning if you call the 7222 1234 number you'll hear a recorded message directing you to dial the new 0843 number. It is interesting to read the official blurb on the TfL website about the change. New, voice-activated service The new number includes a voice-activated service that will deal with simple A to B journeys between stations, hospitals, major landmarks or points of interest within the London area. If your journey's more complicated you can speak to a travel adviser Benefits No more waiting to speak to someone Get information easily and speedily On the phone for less time Travel advisers have more time for you if you do need them We'll be making even more improvements to this service soon - watch this space. It will be interesting to see how the "voice activated" service copes with the following tube journeys:- Morden to Wimbledon London Bridge to Liverpool Street Euston To Russell Square Walthamstow Central to Leytonstone All of which are generally quicker by bus. It never ceases to amaze me how deteriorations in service are dressed up as "improvements". Rather like the Royal Mail in my area who, motivated by a desire to "constantly improve our service to our customers" have decided that the last collection from the local pillar box will be at 5:30pm instead of 6:30pm. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Oct, 14:37, Paul wrote:
On 25 Oct, 08:45, "Mizter T" wrote: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/13879.aspx From today one can no longer dial a London number to get London travel information, one has to dial the new 0843 222 1234 number - 0843 numbers of course cost more, from a BT line that's 5p a minute (plus a "call set up fee" aka connection fee of 10.9p), but the real sting is for those who call from mobiles - e.g. from an O2 contract phone it will cost 20p/min, or an O2 PAYG phone it'll cost 25p/min. And UIVMM the 0843 number range is not included within any inclusive allowances offered by any landline telco (BT, Virgin, Talk Talk etc), let alone any offered by a mobile provider. A regressive step, IMHO. One trusts that TfL will retain ownership of ABBey 1234 nonetheless (you never know, it could be put back into use in the future). As of this morning if you call the 7222 1234 number you'll hear a recorded message directing you to dial the new 0843 number. *It is interesting to read the official blurb on the TfL website about the change. New, voice-activated service The new number includes a voice-activated service that will deal with simple A to B journeys between stations, hospitals, major landmarks or points of interest within the London area. If your journey's more complicated you can speak to a travel adviser Benefits No more waiting to speak to someone Get information easily and speedily On the phone for less time Travel advisers have more time for you if you do need them We'll be making even more improvements to this service soon - watch this space. It will be interesting to see how the "voice activated" service copes with the following tube journeys:- Morden to Wimbledon London Bridge to Liverpool Street Euston To Russell Square Walthamstow Central to Leytonstone All of which are generally quicker by bus. It never ceases to amaze me how deteriorations in service are dressed up as "improvements". Rather like the Royal Mail in my area who, motivated by a desire to "constantly improve our service to our customers" have decided that the last collection from the local pillar box will be at 5:30pm instead of 6:30pm. Of course it's an improvement. We can now make journeys of our own choice, freed from the burden of interference by travel advisors. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 12:45*am, "Mizter T" wrote:
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/13879.aspx From today one can no longer dial a London number to get London travel information, one has to dial the new 0843 222 1234 number - 0843 numbers of course cost more, from a BT line that's 5p a minute (plus a "call set up fee" aka connection fee of 10.9p), but the real sting is for those who call from mobiles - e.g. from an O2 contract phone it will cost 20p/min, or an O2 PAYG phone it'll cost 25p/min. And UIVMM the 0843 number range is not included within any inclusive allowances offered by any landline telco (BT, Virgin, Talk Talk etc), let alone any offered by a mobile provider. A regressive step, IMHO. One trusts that TfL will retain ownership of ABBey 1234 nonetheless (you never know, it could be put back into use in the future). As of this morning if you call the 7222 1234 number you'll hear a recorded message directing you to dial the new 0843 number. Agreed on all points. The new automated system could just as easily been implemented on the old, 020-7222 1234, number. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Oct 25, 9:09*pm, 1506 wrote: On Oct 25, 12:45*am, "Mizter T" wrote: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/13879.aspx From today one can no longer dial a London number to get London travel information, one has to dial the new 0843 222 1234 number - 0843 numbers of course cost more, from a BT line that's 5p a minute (plus a "call set up fee" aka connection fee of 10.9p), but the real sting is for those who call from mobiles - e.g. from an O2 contract phone it will cost 20p/min, or an O2 PAYG phone it'll cost 25p/min. And UIVMM the 0843 number range is not included within any inclusive allowances offered by any landline telco (BT, Virgin, Talk Talk etc), let alone any offered by a mobile provider. A regressive step, IMHO. One trusts that TfL will retain ownership of ABBey 1234 nonetheless (you never know, it could be put back into use in the future). As of this morning if you call the 7222 1234 number you'll hear a recorded message directing you to dial the new 0843 number. Agreed on all points. *The new automated system could just as easily been implemented on the old, 020-7222 1234, number. Except that wouldn't have resulted in any revenue, whilst with the 0843 number, TfL gets a cut of the monies. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Oct, 21:20, Mizter T wrote:
On Oct 25, 9:09*pm, 1506 wrote: On Oct 25, 12:45*am, "Mizter T" wrote: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/13879.aspx From today one can no longer dial a London number to get London travel information, one has to dial the new 0843 222 1234 number - 0843 numbers of course cost more, from a BT line that's 5p a minute (plus a "call set up fee" aka connection fee of 10.9p), but the real sting is for those who call from mobiles - e.g. from an O2 contract phone it will cost 20p/min, or an O2 PAYG phone it'll cost 25p/min. And UIVMM the 0843 number range is not included within any inclusive allowances offered by any landline telco (BT, Virgin, Talk Talk etc), let alone any offered by a mobile provider. A regressive step, IMHO. One trusts that TfL will retain ownership of ABBey 1234 nonetheless (you never know, it could be put back into use in the future). As of this morning if you call the 7222 1234 number you'll hear a recorded message directing you to dial the new 0843 number. Agreed on all points. *The new automated system could just as easily been implemented on the old, 020-7222 1234, number. Except that wouldn't have resulted in any revenue, whilst with the 0843 number, TfL gets a cut of the monies. Does anyone know if they get a bigger cut of the bigger fees charged to mobiles for those numbers? I've never understood the logic behind that. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Oct 25, 9:49*pm, MIG wrote: On 25 Oct, 21:20, Mizter T wrote: On Oct 25, 9:09*pm, 1506 wrote: On Oct 25, 12:45*am, "Mizter T" wrote: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/13879.aspx From today one can no longer dial a London number to get London travel information, one has to dial the new 0843 222 1234 number - 0843 numbers of course cost more, from a BT line that's 5p a minute (plus a "call set up fee" aka connection fee of 10.9p), but the real sting is for those who call from mobiles - e.g. from an O2 contract phone it will cost 20p/min, or an O2 PAYG phone it'll cost 25p/min. And UIVMM the 0843 number range is not included within any inclusive allowances offered by any landline telco (BT, Virgin, Talk Talk etc), let alone any offered by a mobile provider. A regressive step, IMHO. One trusts that TfL will retain ownership of ABBey 1234 nonetheless (you never know, it could be put back into use in the future). As of this morning if you call the 7222 1234 number you'll hear a recorded message directing you to dial the new 0843 number. Agreed on all points. *The new automated system could just as easily been implemented on the old, 020-7222 1234, number. Except that wouldn't have resulted in any revenue, whilst with the 0843 number, TfL gets a cut of the monies. Does anyone know if they get a bigger cut of the bigger fees charged to mobiles for those numbers? *I've never understood the logic behind that. I think the 'termination fee' (that is, the fee paid to the final telco, which in this instance it then shares with the called party) is the same regardless of where the call originates from (so the rest is kept by the mobile service provider) - so from a mobile users perspective it's a mighty expensive way for TfL to collect a few pennies for the call. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Oct, 01:09, Mizter T wrote:
On Oct 25, 9:49*pm, MIG wrote: On 25 Oct, 21:20, Mizter T wrote: On Oct 25, 9:09*pm, 1506 wrote: On Oct 25, 12:45*am, "Mizter T" wrote: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/contact/13879.aspx From today one can no longer dial a London number to get London travel information, one has to dial the new 0843 222 1234 number - 0843 numbers of course cost more, from a BT line that's 5p a minute (plus a "call set up fee" aka connection fee of 10.9p), but the real sting is for those who call from mobiles - e.g. from an O2 contract phone it will cost 20p/min, or an O2 PAYG phone it'll cost 25p/min. And UIVMM the 0843 number range is not included within any inclusive allowances offered by any landline telco (BT, Virgin, Talk Talk etc), let alone any offered by a mobile provider. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 00:33:14 on Tue, 26 Oct 2010, MIG remarked: It leaves the question: why would it cost the mobile company more to connect to one of these numbers than to connect to any other number? It doesn't necessarily[1]. Phone calls are not priced on a cost-plus basis. [1] Although it probably does cost the mobile phone company more to carry the call from a handset to the interconnection point, than it would cost many landline operators. If "cost" takes everything into account. -- Roland Perry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:33:14AM -0700, MIG wrote:
Which makes sense from a billing point of view. It leaves the question: why would it cost the mobile company more to connect to one of these numbers than to connect to any other number? Because they get billed more by TfL's telco. However, them charging 20p+ a minute instead of just 5p a minute is "because we can". -- David Cantrell | Minister for Arbitrary Justice The word "urgent" is the moral of the story "The boy who cried wolf". As a general rule I don't believe it until a manager comes to me almost in tears. I like to catch them in a cup and drink them later. -- Matt Holiab, in the Monastery |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
020 7222 1234 working again | London Transport | |||
Fare enquiry | London Transport | |||
Fare enquiry - Zone 6 Gatwick Express CDR | London Transport | |||
The Thameslink Planning Enquiry | London Transport | |||
Routing enquiry - Fleet to London Terminals | London Transport |