Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Nov 16, 5:39*pm, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 12:29:37 on Tue, 16 Nov 2010, David Cantrell remarked: Dunno, but I don't get paid extra, and have often had to spend Sundays travelling to overseas meetings, which frequently clash with UK Bank Holiday Mondays. A reasonable employer would give you TOIL for both the time spent travelling and the time spent working. I'm self employed, so I'll have to have a word with myself about that! Time to join a union me thinks... |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:47:55AM -0800, David F wrote:
On Nov 16, 12:29=A0pm, David Cantrell wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:11:04PM +0000, Roland Perry wrote: Dunno, but I don't get paid extra, and have often had to spend Sundays travelling to overseas meetings, which frequently clash with UK Bank Holiday Mondays. A reasonable employer would give you TOIL for both the time spent travelling and the time spent working. I've never seen this in the private sector. It's been standard practice in every place I've worked that had more than a handful of staff. Or at least, I've always just taken it (having, naturally, informed people of when I would be away) and never had any problems. Perhaps other more deferential and less assertive staff didn't get it. That's their problem. I do the same - often have to travel on Sunday evenings so I can make a Monday morning meeting either overseas, or in a difficult to get-to spot of the UK. I don't get any extra pay, nor any extra time off. TOIL isn't *extra* time off. I suppose it depends on the job. None of mine have had the expectation of having to do those sort of shenanigans regularly, and so when I *did* have to do them, it would be reasonable to compensate me for them. If it *is* a significant part of your job, then I suppose it could be argued that you knew about it in advance and so don't need to be compensated for it. I'm thankful I have a job. I'm thankful that I have a *good* job where the notional 9 to 5 is sufficient to comfortably support the far more important 5 to 9. -- David Cantrell | London Perl Mongers Deputy Chief Heretic What a lovely day! Now watch me spoil it for you. |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, David F wrote:
On Nov 16, 12:29*pm, David Cantrell wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:11:04PM +0000, Roland Perry wrote: Dunno, but I don't get paid extra, and have often had to spend Sundays travelling to overseas meetings, which frequently clash with UK Bank Holiday Mondays. A reasonable employer would give you TOIL for both the time spent travelling and the time spent working. I've never seen this in the private sector. If we're talking about whole days, then i work in the private sector, and i get it. Ditto for the one of my housemates who isn't a civil servant. I'm in software, he's a medical writer (lot's of travelling to conferences and so on). I do the same - often have to travel on Sunday evenings so I can make a Monday morning meeting either overseas, or in a difficult to get-to spot of the UK. I don't get any extra pay, nor any extra time off. Evenings travelling, i admit, don't earn time off. If i fly to Denmark after work, i won't get time off; if i fly to Connecticut, i will. I'm thankful I have a job. I submit that this is the wrong attitude. Your employer should be thankful he has you. tom -- Do more with less -- R. Buckminster Fuller |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Mizter T wrote:
On Nov 16, 5:39*pm, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 12:29:37 on Tue, 16 Nov 2010, David Cantrell remarked: Dunno, but I don't get paid extra, and have often had to spend Sundays travelling to overseas meetings, which frequently clash with UK Bank Holiday Mondays. A reasonable employer would give you TOIL for both the time spent travelling and the time spent working. I'm self employed, so I'll have to have a word with myself about that! Time to join a union me thinks... There is such a thing in the US: http://www.freelancersunion.org/ tom -- Do more with less -- R. Buckminster Fuller |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 17, 9:22*pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Mizter T wrote: On Nov 16, 5:39*pm, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 12:29:37 on Tue, 16 Nov 2010, David Cantrell remarked: Dunno, but I don't get paid extra, and have often had to spend Sundays travelling to overseas meetings, which frequently clash with UK Bank Holiday Mondays. A reasonable employer would give you TOIL for both the time spent travelling and the time spent working. I'm self employed, so I'll have to have a word with myself about that! Time to join a union me thinks... There is such a thing in the US: http://www.freelancersunion.org/ tom A union is for life; not just for the dispute. |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Nov 17, 9:20*pm, Tom Anderson wrote: On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, David F wrote: I'm thankful I have a job. I submit that this is the wrong attitude. Your employer should be thankful he has you. ;-) |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 11:40:25
on Wed, 17 Nov 2010, David Cantrell remarked: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:11:04PM +0000, Roland Perry wrote: Dunno, but I don't get paid extra, and have often had to spend Sundays travelling to overseas meetings, which frequently clash with UK Bank Holiday Mondays. A reasonable employer would give you TOIL for both the time spent travelling and the time spent working. I've never seen this in the private sector. It's been standard practice in every place I've worked that had more than a handful of staff. Or at least, I've always just taken it (having, naturally, informed people of when I would be away) and never had any problems. Perhaps other more deferential and less assertive staff didn't get it. That's their problem. It certainly sorts out the people who live to work, or work to live. Depending on the task at hand, it can be better to profile your staff one way or the other. I do the same - often have to travel on Sunday evenings so I can make a Monday morning meeting either overseas, or in a difficult to get-to spot of the UK. I don't get any extra pay, nor any extra time off. TOIL isn't *extra* time off. There's a concept of time-and-a-half off in lieu, of course. One organisation I've worked with pays time and a half for weekday overtime, and gives double TOIL for weekend and Bank Holidays. But that can lead to obsessive clock-watching. What if you have a colleague visiting from overseas, the meeting finishes at 5pm and he asks if you mind doing some extra briefing over a drink. But to get your overtime for that you need to consult a manager, and you are unwilling to do anything that looks like work unless you are paid? Personal circumstances can make a difference too - an awkward commute or children to collect from school or cook dinner for, can change people's outlook significantly. And if you went to an off-site meeting and are on the train back to base in the evening - does paying overtime mean you also be expected to read some papers preparing for the following day? Overseas trips can also be an issue - how do you book overtime/TOIL for a journey that starts at 7pm with a taxi to the airport, followed by an overnight flight, but the bulk of the following day relaxing by the pool? When the employer might prefer you to get up at 4am the next day, and fly in daylight, missing the pool-time (but which is also time recouperating and will make you more productive later). I suppose it depends on the job. None of mine have had the expectation of having to do those sort of shenanigans regularly, and so when I *did* have to do them, it would be reasonable to compensate me for them. If it *is* a significant part of your job, then I suppose it could be argued that you knew about it in advance and so don't need to be compensated for it. It's like the need (and ability because of Visa status etc) of being able to travel for work. I'm thankful I have a job. I'm thankful that I have a *good* job where the notional 9 to 5 is sufficient to comfortably support the far more important 5 to 9. That works for some tasks, not others. -- Roland Perry |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Mizter T wrote:
On Nov 16, 5:39=A0pm, Roland Perry wrote: I'm self employed, so I'll have to have a word with myself about that! Time to join a union me thinks... Not quite as silly an idea as it may seem. My union is basically an insurance policy that gets me free access to lawyers specialising in work-place and employment law. Are you a member of PCG, Roland? -- David Cantrell Professor of Unvironmental Science University of Human Progress |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 12:57:35
on Thu, 18 Nov 2010, David Cantrell remarked: Are you a member of PCG, Roland? Curiously enough I was co-chair of something called a PCG, but a different one, earlier this year. As my day-job is doing lobbying activity, joining PCG would be a bit of a busman's holiday, and I can't be worrying about every aspect of policy to do with every aspect of my life. So no. -- Roland Perry |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:07:25 +0000
Roland Perry wrote: As my day-job is doing lobbying activity, Thats a job? B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Tube drivers threaten third Boxing Day strike in a row" | London Transport | |||
Boxing Day Tube Strike - What A Surprise | London Transport | |||
Boxing Day (Sunday 26th) ASLEF tube strike still on | London Transport | |||
Christmas Day and Boxing Day Rail Summary | London Transport | |||
Tube strike threat grows | London Transport |