Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forwarded FYI from the Watford Observer :
Rail scheme fails in bid for funding http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/new..._ funding.php THE long-awaited Croxley Rail scheme failed in its bid for Government funding, it was announced yesterday (Thursday 18 Dec. 2003). The Department of Transport said that the £97million scheme was still under review and they were waiting for more details to come through from Hertfordshire County Council. The news will come as a blow to campaigners and passenger groups alike. If built, it would have allowed commuters to board the Metropolitan line at Watford Junction, West Watford and Watford High Street, meaning quicker access into London. - - - With seasonal greetings, - Alan (in Brussels ; mind the spamtrap) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan (in Brussels)" wrote in message ... Forwarded FYI from the Watford Observer : Rail scheme fails in bid for funding http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/new..._ funding.php THE long-awaited Croxley Rail scheme failed in its bid for Government funding, it was announced yesterday (Thursday 18 Dec. 2003). The Department of Transport said that the £97million scheme was still under review and they were waiting for more details to come through from Hertfordshire County Council. The news will come as a blow to campaigners and passenger groups alike. If built, it would have allowed commuters to board the Metropolitan line at Watford Junction, West Watford and Watford High Street, meaning quicker access into London. - - - With seasonal greetings, - Alan (in Brussels ; mind the spamtrap) Hardly surprising. Being outside Greater London TfL is not going to put money into it, and all the funds (and then some) that the Government / SRA had for rail have just been blown by Network Rails increasing requirements. So, the only place the money could come from would be Herts CC or some sort of PFI. Colin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:10:59 -0000, "Colin"
wrote: "Alan (in Brussels)" wrote in message ... Forwarded FYI from the Watford Observer : Rail scheme fails in bid for funding http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/new..._ funding.php THE long-awaited Croxley Rail scheme failed in its bid for Government funding, it was announced yesterday (Thursday 18 Dec. 2003). The Department of Transport said that the £97million scheme was still under review and they were waiting for more details to come through from Hertfordshire County Council. The article does not seem to agree with the headline - if the scheme is still under review then, not being expert at reading netween civil service lines, I interpret that as no decision having been made - so no change. Hardly surprising. Being outside Greater London TfL is not going to put money into it, and all the funds (and then some) that the Government / SRA had for rail have just been blown by Network Rails increasing requirements. On the contrary I would have thought that TfL got more passengers from better located stations and cold make a fat profit from the old station site. So, the only place the money could come from would be Herts CC or some sort of PFI. Herts CC do not seem to spend their own (ie council taxpayers') money on transport, merely grants from central government. (I assume all CCs work that way.) Croxley link has been a major project in Herts grant applications for many years now. -- Peter Lawrence |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alan \(in Brussels\)" wrote in message ...
Forwarded FYI from the Watford Observer : Rail scheme fails in bid for funding http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/new..._ funding.php THE long-awaited Croxley Rail scheme failed in its bid for Government funding, it was announced yesterday (Thursday 18 Dec. 2003). The Department of Transport said that the £97million scheme was still under review and they were waiting for more details to come through from Hertfordshire County Council. The news will come as a blow to campaigners and passenger groups alike. If built, it would have allowed commuters to board the Metropolitan line at Watford Junction, West Watford and Watford High Street, meaning quicker access into London. - - - With seasonal greetings, - Alan (in Brussels ; mind the spamtrap) This is a link that will open up travel possibilities for so many. For example, residents of the entire Chiltern Railways and Metropolitan Line catchment area will have easy access to the West Coast Mainline. If the SRA and the Regulator's Office can not sort this out, what hope is there for the London Commuter Rail network? Adrian (In Anaheim, dinnay bother about spam, ISP utilizes a trap). |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:45:29 +0100, "Alan \(in Brussels\)"
wrote: Forwarded FYI from the Watford Observer : Rail scheme fails in bid for funding I have now found what the report is based on, see http://tinyurl.com/2loyg page 3. The government seem to consider the scheme poor value for money on avilable information so are not funding it this time round. They will reconsider if TfL are willing to make a firmer (bigger??) commitment after the 2004 Strategic Review. Herts CC have been silent so far1 -- Peter Lawrence |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The government seem to consider
the scheme poor value for money on avilable information so are not funding it this time round. The scheme will be considered poor value for money, when three weeks before the announcement the cost mysteriously nearly doubled from £50m to £97m. P Erbert |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Erbert23658200" wrote in message ... The government seem to consider the scheme poor value for money on avilable information so are not funding it this time round. The scheme will be considered poor value for money, when three weeks before the announcement the cost mysteriously nearly doubled from £50m to £97m. P Erbert Maybe they looked at the examples of several other recent rail projects (e.g. the adjoining WCML) and decided to use a realistic figure in their estimate :S Colin |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Colin" wrote in message ...
"Erbert23658200" wrote in message ... The government seem to consider the scheme poor value for money on avilable information so are not funding it this time round. The scheme will be considered poor value for money, when three weeks before the announcement the cost mysteriously nearly doubled from £50m to £97m. P Erbert Maybe they looked at the examples of several other recent rail projects (e.g. the adjoining WCML) and decided to use a realistic figure in their estimate :S Colin Isn't it funny though how cost is never an issue with road or airport projects? Couple of billion for an airport extension? No problem. 97M for a rail extension? cue lots of teeth sucking. Its only rail where the books seem to have to balance to the last penny and future growth is never taken into account. The only exception to this seems to have been the CTRL, but that was probably due to avoiding political humiliation in front of the french more than anything else. B2003 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Croxley rail link additioanl funding. | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link progress | London Transport | |||
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link news | London Transport |