![]() |
reducing congestion
"Silk" wrote in message ... Cast_Iron wrote: Are you admitting by that statement that you are sufficiently unintelligent that you are incapable of treating other people in a reasonable manner? No, I'm simply being realistic. One person making a "stand" cannot do much on their own. Governments need to impliment policies that encourage fairness within the limits of practicality. It's one thing being nice to people in the street and generally being a good citizen; it's quite another matter when serious, life changing, amounts of money are involved. Quite true that, generally speaking, one individual on his own stands little chance of changing anything unless in a position of authority. However, one must not confuse an appreciation of reality with NG discussion. |
reducing congestion
"Aidan Stanger" wrote in message ... Cast_Iron wrote: "Clive George" wrote... "Cast_Iron" wrotem... Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? Less controversially, isn't it time that second homes attracted the normal (ie non-discount) rate of council tax? ISTR they were changing the law to allow that to happen. Maybe they could even use some of the extra revenue to build more council houses, thus removing one of the problems that has kept this thread going for so long... But if I had suggested that we wouldn't have had this interesting conversation I suspect, IMNSHO most of this conversation has been rather dull! unless someone wants to prove me wrong? You have phrased the original question in such a way that plenty of people want to prove you wrong. Unfortunately, in their haste to do so, they have focused entirely on your objectionable method, and completly ignored the stupidity of your purpose: Reducing congestion on uncongested roads but having no effect on those same roads at the times when they really are congested. Damn, sussed!! |
reducing congestion
|
reducing congestion
|
reducing congestion
In article ,
says... "Pete Smith" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Silk" wrote in message ... Conor wrote: Dairy. Except the bit about making hay for the cattle to eat in the winter, that is. If the cattle were having grass and hay rather than feed/concentrates, which season is for hay making? Same as silage, which is what they tend to feed cattle round here. Which season is for cutting to make silage then? Summer-ish. I've not made hay for a few years now, and I can't remember exactly when it was, but it was around May sometime. If you have a good year, (around where I used to live anyway), you could actually get two cuts per year. Pete. -- NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be bounced to you Remove the news and underscore from my address to reply by mail |
reducing congestion
"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message ... On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:30:54 +1030, (Aidan Stanger) wrote: If you were to believe the CPRE, the SE is currently like downtown Hong Hong during the rush hour, when the reality is that approximately 15% of the land within 1 hours commute of charring cross is built on. A one hour commute by your favoured mode is only about ten miles at most. Are you suggesting that there are open fields within that area? He didn't specify the mode, but it seemed pretty obvious to me that he meant by train. Damn! I'll try to be more obtuse the next time. :-). Even people whose favourite method of getting around is by car would think twice about using it to commute to Charing Cross. You'd want your head examined. So of all the people who commute into London by car (of which there is still a significant number I understand) none of them work in the vicinity of Charing Cross? Seems a bit unlukely to me, especially as at least one office block along the Strand has it's own sub-surface car park. |
reducing congestion
Cast_Iron wrote:
However, one must not confuse an appreciation of reality with NG discussion. I never do that. :-) |
reducing congestion
Cast_Iron wrote:
So of all the people who commute into London by car (of which there is still a significant number I understand) none of them work in the vicinity of Charing Cross? Seems a bit unlukely to me, especially as at least one office block along the Strand has it's own sub-surface car park. Of course some people commute to that area by car. However, I'd expect most (if not all) of those people to be commuting from other parts of London. |
reducing congestion
JNugent wrote:
The previous question was "Are you suggesting that there are open fields within that area?" ("that area" being a one-hour commute from Charing Cross). There are plenty of open fields in "that area", and my response about being able to travel 60 miles in an hour in "that area" would reflect that even literally, but in any case, the PP's question was not about agriculture but was about whether you can get outside the inner London built-up area within an hour, and you can. Well in that case I owe Robin (and others) an apology: Sorry, I assumed JNugent's statement was sensible and inconsistent. It appears I was wrong on both counts. (Except possibly if he's referring to commuting in the small hours and is prepared to risk getting gatsoed). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk