Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#281
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Hennessy wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:55:39 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron" wrote: I can fully understand my posts, unlike the emoting idiot who is drawing inferences where none clearly exist. No emotion in my posts, talking about or to yourself again? Oh really ? Just to pick one at random. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...btinternet. c om&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain What, in that, are you defining as emotion? |
#282
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#283
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Purditer wrote:
General Secretary of the RMT Never heard of him. |
#284
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why not create a scheme in which long term
council tenants can get assistance to buy a house on the open market? Seems sensible to me, as long as it does not involve me subsidising them as in when they bought their houses. I was always surprised by the sudden increase in value of these houses, who in their right mind would want to buy a house on a council estate unless the price was artificially low. |
#285
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Silk" wrote in message ... Purditer wrote: General Secretary of the RMT Never heard of him. Not from London then? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3326735.stm |
#286
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Silk wrote:
Cast_Iron wrote: Ah at last, the standard "**** you Jack, I'm OK" attitude. It's **** or be ****ed, unfortunately. That's why we are supposed to have governments and leaders to guide us. Are you admitting by that statement that you are sufficiently unintelligent that you are incapable of treating other people in a reasonable manner? |
#287
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Purditer wrote:
Why not create a scheme in which long term council tenants can get assistance to buy a house on the open market? Seems sensible to me, as long as it does not involve me subsidising them as in when they bought their houses. I was always surprised by the sudden increase in value of these houses, who in their right mind would want to buy a house on a council estate unless the price was artificially low. It makes you wonder doesn't it? It's just another aspect of people being suckered in by Thatcher's, "property owning democracy" which is ok until it becomes a millstone round the neck. |
#288
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Purditer wrote:
Not from London then? No. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3326735.stm Typical union. Sounds like the bloke deserved the sack. |
#289
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cast_Iron wrote:
Are you admitting by that statement that you are sufficiently unintelligent that you are incapable of treating other people in a reasonable manner? No, I'm simply being realistic. One person making a "stand" cannot do much on their own. Governments need to impliment policies that encourage fairness within the limits of practicality. It's one thing being nice to people in the street and generally being a good citizen; it's quite another matter when serious, life changing, amounts of money are involved. |
#290
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:09:39 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron"
wrote: Greg Hennessy wrote: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...btinternet. c om&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain What, in that, are you defining as emotion? All of it. A clear appeal to consequences. greg -- Once you try my burger baby,you'll grow a new thyroid gland. I said just eat my burger, baby,make you smart as Charlie Chan. You say the hot sauce can't be beat. Sit back and open wide. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Legal challenges and congestion charging for 30 second journey leaving zone? | London Transport | |||
The effects of a road congestion tax | London Transport | |||
Congestion charge cheat | London Transport | |||
Crapita bailed-out over congestion charging | London Transport | |||
Extending the congestion charge zone | London Transport |