![]() |
reducing congestion
Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings
is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? An added bonus of this would be to free-up houses in rural and other touristy areas that young people on local wages could afford to buy or rent who would then spend money in the local economy. |
reducing congestion
Cast_Iron wrote:
Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? Is it not mostly caused by either: (a) people who work in the South-East during the week travelling home for the weekend, or (b) people visiting friends and relatives for the weekend -- http://www.speedlimit.org.uk "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." (William Pitt, 1783) |
reducing congestion
"Cast_Iron" wrote in message
... Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? An added bonus of this would be to free-up houses in rural and other touristy areas that young people on local wages could afford to buy or rent who would then spend money in the local economy. I can't say I have a second home, but why should a second home be heavily taxed? Second homes make very low demands upon local services. I would suspect that even if you prevented anyone from owning a second home, it would make little difference to the general housing market. People travelling to their 2nd homes pay plenty of tax travelling to them. I would suspect most traffic though is caused by people seeing friends or relatives, or travelling to/from their place of work for the week. Mikael |
reducing congestion
"Cast_Iron" wrote in message ... Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? An added bonus of this would be to free-up houses in rural and other touristy areas that young people on local wages could afford to buy or rent who would then spend money in the local economy. Absouletely. Anyone with a second home should be made to absolutely pay through-the-nose for it. |
reducing congestion
"Mikael Armstrong" wrote in message ... "Cast_Iron" wrote in message ... Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? An added bonus of this would be to free-up houses in rural and other touristy areas that young people on local wages could afford to buy or rent who would then spend money in the local economy. I can't say I have a second home, but why should a second home be heavily taxed? Because people who own 2 houses are clearly very rich, and the rich should be targeted for tax for two reasons: 1) Social justice 2) It would actually be impossible to raise enough revenue if everyone was taxed to the same %age because the rich provide a disproportionately large chunk of revenue. Second homes make very low demands upon local services. I would suspect that even if you prevented anyone from owning a second home, it would make little difference to the general housing market. This is completely untrue. There are many examples in West England where the popularity of second homes, particularly in scenic locations, has driven up prices making it really hard for people with local jobs to find somewhere affordable. People travelling to their 2nd homes pay plenty of tax travelling to them. I would suspect most traffic though is caused by people seeing friends or relatives, or travelling to/from their place of work for the week. The thing is, most people with a 2nd home will travel there every weekend without fail. Mikael |
reducing congestion
"Cast_Iron" wrote in message
... Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? No. An added bonus of this would be to free-up houses in rural and other touristy areas that young people on local wages could afford to buy or rent who would then spend money in the local economy. If you have to rent or buy, you have to rent or buy - it's that simple. -- The DervMan www.dervman.com |
reducing congestion
"Oliver Keating" wrote in message
... "Mikael Armstrong" wrote in message ... "Cast_Iron" wrote in message ... Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? An added bonus of this would be to free-up houses in rural and other touristy areas that young people on local wages could afford to buy or rent who would then spend money in the local economy. I can't say I have a second home, but why should a second home be heavily taxed? Because people who own 2 houses are clearly very rich, and the rich should be targeted for tax for two reasons: 1) Social justice 2) It would actually be impossible to raise enough revenue if everyone was taxed to the same %age because the rich provide a disproportionately large chunk of revenue. Second homes make very low demands upon local services. I would suspect that even if you prevented anyone from owning a second home, it would make little difference to the general housing market. This is completely untrue. There are many examples in West England where the popularity of second homes, particularly in scenic locations, has driven up prices making it really hard for people with local jobs to find somewhere affordable. It is the lack of supply which will have driven prices up. Lets face it, out of teh total population, very few people have 2nd homes, so you would not have to let many new homes to be built to offset the effect in the areas concerned. Lets allow people to build a few more houses in the areas people actually want to live in, rather than proposing more construction in the areas already filled to the brim. People travelling to their 2nd homes pay plenty of tax travelling to them. I would suspect most traffic though is caused by people seeing friends or relatives, or travelling to/from their place of work for the week. The thing is, most people with a 2nd home will travel there every weekend without fail. And so what? They already pay the petrol tax, they will have paid stamp duty buying the house (another unfair tax), and no doubt they will be high earners paying fair amounts of income tax too. Many people owning 2nd homes probably also spend a reasonable amount in the local area where they travel to at the weekends, and perhaps will have employed local people to renovate the houses if needed. Wealth and properity comes from people doing business, not from taxes. Mikael |
reducing congestion
PeterE wrote...
Cast_Iron wrote: Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? Is it not mostly caused by either: (a) people who work in the South-East during the week travelling home for the weekend, or (b) people visiting friends and relatives for the weekend Don't feed the trolls. |
reducing congestion
"Oliver Keating" wrote in message
... "Cast_Iron" wrote in message ... Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? An added bonus of this would be to free-up houses in rural and other touristy areas that young people on local wages could afford to buy or rent who would then spend money in the local economy. Absouletely. Anyone with a second home should be made to absolutely pay through-the-nose for it. Are you suggesting then that people who buy a small flat near their place of work and have a house in the suburbs or countryside where the rest of their family live should be penalised for it? Surely you would advocate people living close to where they work and reducing their reliance upon the transport infrastructure? Taxes like everything work both ways. Mikael |
reducing congestion
"DervMan" wrote in message ... "Cast_Iron" wrote in message ... Given the that the increased road congestion in Friday and Sunday evenings is caused by many people going and from to their country cottages for the weekend, isn't it time that second homes attracted a punative rate of council tax? No. An added bonus of this would be to free-up houses in rural and other touristy areas that young people on local wages could afford to buy or rent who would then spend money in the local economy. If you have to rent or buy, you have to rent or buy - it's that simple. But it is the question of affordability in relation to local wages that is the cause for concern. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk