Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.transport.london message VJSdnWINQaRt34HTnZ2dnUVZ8hadnZ2d@giganew
s.com, Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:49:52, posted: I really hate online web forms because you don't get a copy of what you wrote for your own records. Or is this one unlike all the others? I wasn't aware of the form and used the phone last time. It may depend on the browser used - but you probably know the value of having a choice - but try the File menu, Print Preview ; and try Alt- PrtScn and paste into Paint or elsewhere ... . Non-Windows OSs should have something similar. -- (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike 6.05 WinXP. Web http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQ-type topics, acronyms, and links. Command-prompt MiniTrue is useful for viewing/searching/altering files. Free, DOS/Win/UNIX now 2.0.6; see URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/pc-links.htm. |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Rigg" wrote in message ... "It might be a bit off topic but if you wanted to go from Hammersmith to Euston why didn't you use the Hammersmith and City Line to Euston Square? Just a thought Because the Hammersmith and Circle lines are utterly useless? Typical scenario: Wait for seven minutes at Paddington for an Eastbound train on an advertised frequency of every five minutes. At Edgware Road wait another four minutes "to regulate the service" even though by my reckoning the train is already late (or perhaps the previous train left Paddington early?). Then at Baker Street wait another three minutes for the same reason. I nearly always take the Bakerloo to Baker Street for the Met forward or Bakerloo to Oxford Circus for the Victoria. Either option is better then the Circle. John |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "W14_Fishbourne" wrote in message ... On Jul 13, 11:06 am, "Paul Scott" wrote: wrote in message ... Loved how that article lead off by describing passengers as "terrified." Their random hyperbole generator usually gets stuck on 'misery' - perhaps it has been fixed? Paul S No, misery is only generated when delay or minor inconvenience is involved, though it is a totally inappropriate word since commuting is, almost by definition, a misearable affair. Terrified is for when something out of the ordinary happens. The average passenger not having a clue as to how the railway works, then becomes terrified. For example, when they see the train driver letting go of the steering wheel they will be terrified that the train will veer across the tracks and crash. Or the wrong colour train turns up and they are terrified that it might transport them to some far-flung and probably hostile part of the country. Oddly, the one circumstance in which very few passengers don't even bat an eye, let alone get terrified, is when the driver applies full emergency braking. They must have short memories. VEPs used to depart Victoria every few minutes with doors open:-) John |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 13, 9:03*pm, "John C" wrote:
They must have short memories. VEPs used to depart Victoria every few minutes with doors open:-) But I bet more arrived with doors open than departed. -- Nick |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/07/2011 11:06, Paul Scott wrote:
wrote in message ... Loved how that article lead off by describing passengers as "terrified." Their random hyperbole generator usually gets stuck on 'misery' - perhaps it has been fixed? I think the railways will be Extremely Sorry if they try criticising the Evening Standard for deploying machine-created emotions. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No mention of RAIB, and when I spoke to the RAIB reporting point after
reading the first internet post about the incident, they weren't aware of the occurrence. Shouldn't the train be quarantined in situ until RAIB either attend or agree it's movement? I'm not sure that RAIB necessarily need to be involved. I think some contributors need to stand back from this a bit and think a bt more rationally. There is a big difference between a train moving off with doors open and continuing with doors open (as occurred at Kentish Town on FCC a few weeks back), and train departing a station with not all doors closed and then near immediately brought to a controlled emergency stop. For the train on topic here, all reports indicate the train did halt with a least some some cars in the platform, which to me suggests a controlled emergency stop. Some of the less hysterical reports also indicate the doors problem was not all cars but only some. One door open is not good, but get a grip on reality here. Door failures are not wholly unheard of on the underground or main line, but you don't see RAIB investigations for trains where correct emergency stops were occurred. IMHO I suggest that this is probably not a RAIB reportable incident. -- Nick |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/07/2011 13:14, W14_Fishbourne wrote:
On Jul 13, 11:06 am, "Paul wrote: wrote in message ... Loved how that article lead off by describing passengers as "terrified." Their random hyperbole generator usually gets stuck on 'misery' - perhaps it has been fixed? Paul S No, misery is only generated when delay or minor inconvenience is involved, though it is a totally inappropriate word since commuting is, almost by definition, a misearable affair. Terrified is for when something out of the ordinary happens. The average passenger not having a clue as to how the railway works, then becomes terrified. The way it was described makes me think that it was the train that stopped, rather than the driver taking any action. It sounds like the train started, with the driver thinking that he had all his doors closed -- possibly because something happened with a door circuit. When he pushed the start button, that door circuit did what it was supposed to do and cut back in. Or the wrong colour train turns up and they are terrified that it might transport them to some far-flung and probably hostile part of the country. I'm not quite sure about that, to be honest. I once saw a YouTube video of an excursion train, I think a 38 stock. The train had come into Camden Town and was holding at the platform for the starter signal, obviously with its doors shut. IIRC, people on the platform were confused about why the train wasn't opening it doors, oblivious to the fact that the rolling stock was completely out of the ordinary. The train itself was probably shorter than usual. |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thank you | London Transport | |||
Thank you First, for nearly getting me killed last night. | London Transport | |||
New Years Eve - Thank You! | London Transport | |||
A big Thank You to Ken Livingstone | London Transport | |||
We buy-back broken and damaged cell-phones of all brands. Thank you! | London Transport |