A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On 26/08/2011 18:28, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 26/08/11 18:13, Roger Traviss wrote:
Is that a deity joke?

Allah be here all week, folks.

God forbid!

That's the holy spirit!


Amen!

--
Graeme Wall
This account not read, substitute trains for rail.
Railway Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On 26/08/2011 10:56, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 26/08/11 10:13, d wrote:
So whats your solution then? Swing the pendulum so far the other way that
it alienates white heterosexuals?

You got any evidence that white heterosexuals as a group feel alienated
by tolerance of others?

The comments section of the Daily Mail website?

--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On 26/08/2011 11:19, d wrote:


(what
religion would that be - the one where you laze around and do bugger all 24/7?).

Hmm, this sounds rather more interesting than all the religions which
obsess over sex or booze or bacon butties. Why weren't we offered that
one instead of school assembly?


--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On 26/08/11 19:08, Arthur Figgis wrote:
On 26/08/2011 11:19, d wrote:


(what
religion would that be - the one where you laze around and do bugger
all 24/7?).

Hmm, this sounds rather more interesting than all the religions which
obsess over sex or booze or bacon butties. Why weren't we offered that
one instead of school assembly?

I think he must be talking about christianity. "Lazing around and doing
bugger all 24/7" is more or less a job description for contemplative
orders of monks and nuns.

Ian

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On 26/08/11 19:06, Arthur Figgis wrote:
On 26/08/2011 10:56, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 26/08/11 10:13, d wrote:
So whats your solution then? Swing the pendulum so far the other way
that
it alienates white heterosexuals?

You got any evidence that white heterosexuals as a group feel alienated
by tolerance of others?

The comments section of the Daily Mail website?

Indeed. Full of victims.

Ian

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:06:06 +0100
Arthur Figgis wrote:
On 26/08/2011 10:56, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 26/08/11 10:13, d wrote:
So whats your solution then? Swing the pendulum so far the other way that
it alienates white heterosexuals?

You got any evidence that white heterosexuals as a group feel alienated
by tolerance of others?

The comments section of the Daily Mail website?

It does make me laugh how people still think implying someone is a Daily Mail
is some kind of knock out punch. As if those limp wristed apologist rags The
Guardian and Observer are bastions of rational considered thought and opinion.
Most of the lentil munching journalists there wouldn't recognise rationality
if it kicked them in their organic nuts.

B2003

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On 26/08/11 19:58, d wrote:

It does make me laugh how people still think implying someone is a Daily Mail
is some kind of knock out punch.

... limp wristed apologist rags ... lentil munching journalists ...

You're certain providing a great example of calm, considered rationality.

Ian

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On 26/08/2011 19:47, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 26/08/11 19:08, Arthur Figgis wrote:
On 26/08/2011 11:19, d wrote:


(what
religion would that be - the one where you laze around and do bugger
all 24/7?).

Hmm, this sounds rather more interesting than all the religions which
obsess over sex or booze or bacon butties. Why weren't we offered that
one instead of school assembly?

I think he must be talking about christianity. "Lazing around and doing
bugger all 24/7" is more or less a job description for contemplative
orders of monks and nuns.

Along with all that Belgian-style beer.

So maybe I shouldn't have spent so much time at school Asking Silly
Questions about dinosaurs and carbon dating.


--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:07:31 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 26/08/11 19:58, d wrote:

It does make me laugh how people still think implying someone is a Daily Mail
is some kind of knock out punch.

... limp wristed apologist rags ... lentil munching journalists ...

You're certain providing a great example of calm, considered rationality.

Considering what I really think about the guardian and the sort of people
who read it I felt those comments were pretty reserved.

B2003

A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'?
 

On 26/08/2011 19:58, d wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:06:06 +0100
Arthur wrote:
On 26/08/2011 10:56, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 26/08/11 10:13, d wrote:
So whats your solution then? Swing the pendulum so far the other way that
it alienates white heterosexuals?

You got any evidence that white heterosexuals as a group feel alienated
by tolerance of others?

The comments section of the Daily Mail website?

It does make me laugh how people still think implying someone is a Daily Mail
is some kind of knock out punch. As if those limp wristed apologist rags The
Guardian and Observer are bastions of rational considered thought and opinion.
Most of the lentil munching journalists there wouldn't recognise rationality
if it kicked them in their organic nuts.

Is the Guardian actually written (rather than read) by lentil-munchers?
On the admittedly rather small sample of a bloke I once a met on a
Eurostar and someone I knew at university, the Daily Mail isn't written
(entirely?) by foaming-at-the-mouth loonies in black shirts.

I suspect most of the Mail and Guardian journalists could switch papers
and re-slant their stories to suit the different audience with ease.
(what's the old one about The Sun - "Hero saves baby from mad dog"; The
Times - "Man rescues child from dog attack"; Daily Mail - "Immigrant
kills much-loved family pet").


--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK