![]() |
|
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
Following on from Monday's service meltdown on the Thameslink core route at
City Thameslink station (which was seemingly mended and then promptly broke again), there is now a signalling problem elsewhere, this time on the Midland mainline between Cricklewood and Radlett - from FCC JourneyCheck - and it seems like its going to last right into the evening and night: http://www.jcheck.com/firstcapitalconnect ---quote--- Owing to signalling problems between Cricklewood and Radlett all lines are blocked. Train services through these stations may be subject to disruption on all routes at short notice. Disruption is expected until 23:45 11/11. Additional Information: Ticket acceptance is available on LUL, local buses and Croydon Tramlink across London. London Midland, Euston to Milton Keynes, including Watford to St Albans Abbey. FCC Great Northern Kings Cross to Peterborough. Southern any reasonable route. A plan is being put together for services to run as follows: City Thameslink to Sutton, London Bridge to Brighton, Bedford to Luton. Bus replacement as follows, St Albans to Hatfield, Luton/Luton Airport Parkway to Hitchin, Bedford to St Neots. Customers travelling to and from London are advised to travel from Kings Cross and connect into the replacement buses. Message Received :11/11/2011 14:29 ---/quote--- More info from NRE he http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service_disruptions/sa34a55203f2481ca1845d3fc436cc1b/details.html The above states that "Trains between Sevenoaks and Kentish Town are currently suspended" and "A half hourly service will run between London Victoria and Sevenoaks via Catford", seemingly to fill in for the former. (These Sevenoaks services are run by Southeastern south of Blackfriars, so FCC only half-acknowledges their existence.) The statement that "No First Capital Connect trains will run between West Hampstead Thameslink and St Albans" suggests that at least some FCC Thameslink trains will get as far north as West Hampstead. The ongoing unreliability of the Thameslink route is the stuff of legend, which is a great shame as it's such a useful service when it works properly - the supposed light at the end of the tunnel is the 'new & improved' Thameslink after the extensive TL Programme upgrade, but one does wonder whether it'll work as planned if 'they' can't get things right now (I fear there might be a 'one day over the rainbow' attitude w.r.t. Thameslink, meaning that there might be a temptation to brush over the failures of today because of the beckoning promise of the bright new post-TL upgrade tomorrow - but the new, post-upgraded Thameslink won't just magically work properly all by itself). |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
On Nov 11, 2:36*pm, "Mizter T" wrote:
A plan is being put together for services to run as follows: City Thameslink to Sutton, London Bridge to Brighton, Bedford to Luton. Bus replacement as follows, St Albans to Hatfield, Luton/Luton Airport Parkway to Hitchin, Bedford to St Neots. Going to be hard to get enough buses to do that! (It's a bit different if you get a problem like this in the morning, as those with an option to work from home usually will when faced with that kind of disruption). If trains are running Bedford-Luton, might a better answer be to bustitute (taxi-stitute, more like) Bedford-Bletchley local stations, get some DMUs down from somewhere (LM got any spare 150s that haven't cascaded yet?) and run a 4-car shuttle Bedford-Bletchley as frequently as possible, with stop orders at Bletchley for all LM services that don't presently stop there? Neil |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
On Nov 11, 2:58*pm, Neil Williams wrote:
If trains are running Bedford-Luton, might a better answer be to bustitute (taxi-stitute, more like) Bedford-Bletchley local stations, get some DMUs down from somewhere (LM got any spare 150s that haven't cascaded yet?) and run a 4-car shuttle Bedford-Bletchley as frequently as possible, with stop orders at Bletchley for all LM services that don't presently stop there? Actually, scratch that:- "East Midlands Trains services can now run between London St Pancras International and Luton / Bedford" So they're going to be quite busy, then. Time to hire in some locomotives and stock to ensure everything is 10-car? Neil |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
I was interested in the alternatives:
Passengers may use: East Coast services between London Kings Cross and Doncaster CrossCountry trains between Birmingham New Street and Leicester on some services Grand Central on all reasonable routes London Midland on all reasonable routes London Underground on all reasonable routes Virgin Trains on all reasonable routes Perhaps I've missed it before, but having Grand Central accepting EMT tickets is something I don't recall before. David |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
"Mizter T" wrote: http://www.jcheck.com/firstcapitalconnect ---quote--- Owing to signalling problems between Cricklewood and Radlett all lines are blocked. Train services through these stations may be subject to disruption on all routes at short notice. Disruption is expected until 23:45 11/11. [...] ---/quote--- More info from NRE he http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service_disruptions/sa34a55203f2481ca1845d3fc436cc1b/details.html The NRE page said and is still saying "Journeys between London St Pancras International and Luton may be delayed by up to 90 minutes", whilst the JourneyCheck message said and still says that "all lines are blocked" - looking at FCC's Twitter stream, the latter message would appear to be correct and nothing's moving through the affected area, e.g.: http://twitter.com/#!/FirstCC/status/135006922691723264 That doesn't stop LDB from promising trains that seemingly can't run, for example the St Pancras LDB is showing trains to Luton and Bedford... http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/ldbboard/dep/STP ....whilst the Mill Hill Broadway LDB still suggests services are running to and from the station (when it actually falls within the portion of the line that's supposedly blocked)... http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/ldbboard/dep/MIL Also, haven't seen this before (but maybe I've just never looked for it) - on the NRE 'Service alterations' page, under the "Ticket Acceptance / Alternative travel routes" heading, this is one of the bullet points: ---quote--- * Local Buses between Welwyn Garden City and Luton (Route 366) and Potters Bar and St Albans (Route 84). Please note, you will need to purchase a ticket for this journey and request a refund from First Capital Connect ---/quote--- Not so much "ticket acceptance" as 'ticket non-acceptance', though it's undoubtedly an "alternative travel route" though. Wonder if this might all be the work of cable thievery? (Though on the busy MML, in the middle of the day?) |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
"Neil Williams" wrote: Actually, scratch that:- "East Midlands Trains services can now run between London St Pancras International and Luton / Bedford" So they're going to be quite busy, then. Time to hire in some locomotives and stock to ensure everything is 10-car? That's almost suggestive of it being an OHLE power issue (EMT having diesel traction of course) rather than a signalling issue - though I'd be wary of jumping to that conclusion just yet - perhaps they've hashed the signalling together enough to be able to run a service on the fast lines, who knows? |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
In message , at 15:17:28 on Fri, 11
Nov 2011, David Thornhill remarked: I was interested in the alternatives: Passengers may use: East Coast services between London Kings Cross and Doncaster FCC to Peterborough would help as well. CrossCountry trains between Birmingham New Street and Leicester on some services But not Birmingham to Derby/Nottingham it seems. Or Peterborough-Leicester. Grand Central on all reasonable routes London Midland on all reasonable routes London Underground on all reasonable routes Virgin Trains on all reasonable routes And of course on other ex-CT EMT's I presume. Perhaps I've missed it before, but having Grand Central accepting EMT tickets is something I don't recall before. Sheffield via York? -- Roland Perry |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
"Mizter T" wrote: [...] That's almost suggestive of it being an OHLE power issue (EMT having diesel traction of course) rather than a signalling issue - though I'd be wary of jumping to that conclusion just yet - perhaps they've hashed the signalling together enough to be able to run a service on the fast lines, who knows? Network Rail tweets: "St Pancras: Power restored. Disruption continues, for which we are very sorry. Service information: http://bit.ly/sT3zWK @EmTrains @FirstCC" http://twitter.com/#!/networkrail/status/135025991801249793 The nature of the power failure is unspecified. |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 15:17:28 on Fri, 11 Nov 2011, David Thornhill remarked: Perhaps I've missed it before, but having Grand Central accepting EMT tickets is something I don't recall before. Sheffield via York? Presumably via Doncaster (on Bradford trains), though there may be passengers with EMT + Connections tickets to stations north of Sheffield who would be able to use GC beyond Doncaster. Peter |
Thameslink up the spout again - sig problem twixt Cricklewood and Radlett
I've just come though this one. I got a text from a friend at just after 15:00, I was near Farringdon; no time to properly check what FCC were saying; the gen I had was similar to early posts nothing between WHP and StAlbans, and 90 min delays between StPancras and Luton. I had no bus gen. I got to Farringdon at 15:18, TL platforms barriered off but no whiteboards out. Experience tells me if something is running north of StAlbans by far the best way is via Watford Junction even with the walk. This avoids buses (for which queuing time can be substantial) and the subsequent bus to train scrums wherever buses go to. I made 15:35 Tring at Euston, which has no direct connect, 16:31 to Snorbens Abbey, walk to Snorbens City, got there about 17:12, empty 8car 319 in DS platform, as walking down to find out what this was, it seemed a couple of buses had arrived and announced train as all stations Bedford. Probably we had 100 or so people on it thats all. Dep 17:20 got to Luton 17:38. In the circumstances not bad, could have been much much worse. And I suspect it is for people still travelling. I understand it is cable theft around Radlett (speculating: maybe the junctions are affected ?), and also that other passengers had been stranded at Snorbens since about 16:00 before the train I was on departed. No sign of any buses at Luton. As those 319s arrived in Luton on DS a 222 on DF indicated Sheffield arrived on DF - and Luton did a very very good move and held both trains for each other with copious holding announcements and staff dealing - there were numeorus passengers swapping both ways between th 2 trains. But I'll add this , the leading FCC person on duty in what I'd at one time called the supervisors office was a long time exBR man, one I've seen and spoken to at Luton many times over more than 20 years, he was coordinating the whole show by radio. Well done to him, but I do wonder had it been one of the off the street fcc ones whether they'd have worked it out. -- Nick |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk