![]() |
|
Just how easy is it to rewrite the rules? TfL and the Olympics
On Nov 18, 2:42*pm, Mwmbwls wrote:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-drivers-rules... Even allowing for the sensationalist "anything to sell(or rather give away) papers" oversimplification approach of the Evening Standard,can this/should this be done? "Drivers will be told, under plans now being considered, not to follow slavishly Transport for London guidelines that cause delays to passengers" is a truly hideous sentence. Presumably theirs subs' desk is not employing some old buffer with a bad grammar-school education who believes that splitting an infinitive is such an egregious crime that its prevention justifies anything, including ugliness and lack of clarity. If you really, really are the last person alive who doesn't realise that concerns about infinitive splitting are (a) a matter of style rather than grammar and (b) mostly the product of silly eighteenth century prescriptivists who believed English was just a degenerate form of Latin in desperate need to restoration, then "not slavishly to follow" is at least readable (although still ugly). But what on earth led the sub to amend what was (almost certainly) the journalist's original, and better, "not to slavishly follow" into the dogs' dinner they published? Pedants I don't mine. Pedants who mangle the language in pursuit of pedantry that is of their own invention, they're a different thing. ian |
Just how easy is it to rewrite the rules? TfL and the Olympics
ian batten wrote:
Pedants I don't mine. Mine or yours? |
Just how easy is it to rewrite the rules? TfL and the Olympics
"ian batten" wrote Pedants I don't mine. So where do you dig them up from? (Pedants say that you shouldn't use a preposition to end a sentence with. ;-) ) Peter |
Just how easy is it to rewrite the rules? TfL and the Olympics
On Nov 21, 4:18*pm, "Peter Masson" wrote:
"ian batten" wrote Pedants I don't mine. Bloody OSX Lion (it silently corrects typing mistakes, rather than highlighting them, so if you're in a hurry you don't notice that it's corrected whatever you mis-typed). So where do you dig them up from? (Pedants say that you shouldn't use a preposition to end a sentence with. Quite. Another bogus piece of "English as defective Latin" nonsense. ian |
Just how easy is it to rewrite the rules? TfL and the Olympics
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:42:14 -0800 (PST), ian batten
wrote: On Nov 21, 4:18*pm, "Peter Masson" wrote: "ian batten" wrote Pedants I don't mine. Bloody OSX Lion (it silently corrects typing mistakes, rather than highlighting them, so if you're in a hurry you don't notice that it's corrected whatever you mis-typed). Why don't you switch it off and use your fingers for the typos like the rest of us di ? So where do you dig them up from? (Pedants say that you shouldn't use a preposition to end a sentence with. Quite. Another bogus piece of "English as defective Latin" nonsense. ian |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk