Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#191
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/23/2012 4:51 PM, John Levine wrote:
I gather that if you already have a credit card point of sale terminal, it's a cheap add-on. The hard part may be negotiating the floor limit below which the customer doesn't have to sign. At Wegmans, it's quite high, $50. Actually, it may drop the costs of the transactions as they may charge less as it is harder to counterfeit the chip than it is the card swipe. |
#192
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Levine wrote:
Yet here in the United States, when prices for airline travel and hotel rooms are stated, they included taxes. In Europe, travel prices are more often stated without all taxes included. Airline prices are quoted with tax because there is an FTC rule that says they have to do that. They decided, quite reasonably, that quoting the price without the tax is misleading. The rule isn't quite that simple, they're apparently allowed to quote the fake price so long as the real price is in tiny print nearby. It's not an FTC rule. It's a US DOT rule, according to several news articles I've read. No, it is NOT acceptable to list the price, net of taxes and fees, in large type, with the total price in small type. The new rule on advertising total prices including taxes and fees takes effect on the 26th. I cannot find anything similar for hotel quotes, though. |
#193
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:40:08 +0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
wrote: wrote: In the US, there is a credit card feature called "Blink" (Chase Bank) where one just touches the card against the reader and the charge is instantly posted. This is faster than cash or conventional credit cards. Some big chains accept this, like McDonald's, CVS drugstores, and the Wawa convenience store chain. Proximity card. A tiny transponder and chip are built into the card. RFID technology. The major German and Swiss cities with S-Bahns and/or U-Bahns (like Berlin, Hamburg, Munich, and Zurich) do this with paper tickets and cards (I think some with photo-id) that are read by roving inspector. POP obviously works even on heavily used systems. At least in some US cities like San Diego, California and Newark, New Jersey, the legal framework is available for it to work in the United States. Go Transit in Toronto also uses POP. Clark Morris |
#194
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Proximity card. A tiny transponder and chip are built into the card.
RFID technology. No, it's contactless EMV which is not RFID. Please do at least a few milliseconds of research before guessing. R's, John |
#195
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#196
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A smartcard would presumably also work on Metro-North and LIRR, which
are also the MTA, with the remaining question being NJ Transit. The question yet to be answered is how to verify a passenger's length of journey on distance-based fare commuter rail systems. This is not exactly a new problem, you know. On regional rapid transit, they do so by having turnstiles at both entry and exit, so the exit turnstile verifies the ticket is valid for the distance travelled. But on various large commuter rail networks there are no turnstiles. Adding turnstiles would cost a fortune, ... Which is true, but there's no need to do so. The Caltrain commuter trains between San Francisco and San Jose let you pay with the Clipper smart card. All of the stations are ungated, but there are Clipper readers on the platforms. Before you get on the train, you tap your card, after you get off, you tap it again. If you don't tap in, and a conductor checks your ticket, you get fined. If you don't tap out, you're charged for the longest possible trip from where you got on, so it's in your own interest to tap out. Commuters get a monthly pass on their card for the stations where they get on and off, and the conductor can check the card to see that the pass is valid for where they are. This isn't rocket science. Every system I know that has smart cards and distance sensitive fares does this, from the Seattle light rail to TfL in London to the Maokong gondola in Taipei. On the London underground, most of the stations are gated, but some aren't, and you have to be sure to tap in and out or you risk being fined if there's a ticket check on the train or the platform. R's, John |
#197
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Levine writes:
The question yet to be answered is how to verify a passenger's length of journey on distance-based fare commuter rail systems. This is not exactly a new problem, you know. On regional rapid transit, they do so by having turnstiles at both entry and exit, so the exit turnstile verifies the ticket is valid for the distance travelled. But on various large commuter rail networks there are no turnstiles. Adding turnstiles would cost a fortune, ... Which is true, but there's no need to do so. The Caltrain commuter trains between San Francisco and San Jose let you pay with the Clipper smart card. All of the stations are ungated, but there are Clipper readers on the platforms. Before you get on the train, you tap your card, after you get off, you tap it again. If you don't tap in, and a conductor checks your ticket, you get fined. If you don't tap out, you're charged for the longest possible trip from where you got on, so it's in your own interest to tap out. Commuters get a monthly pass on their card for the stations where they get on and off, and the conductor can check the card to see that the pass is valid for where they are. This isn't rocket science. Every system I know that has smart cards and distance sensitive fares does this, from the Seattle light rail to TfL in London to the Maokong gondola in Taipei. On the London underground, most of the stations are gated, but some aren't, and you have to be sure to tap in and out or you risk being fined if there's a ticket check on the train or the platform. For many systems, I'm not sure it makes all that much difference: as soon as a large percentage of the passengers have to "tap-in / tap-out", then you need pretty much exactly the same infrastructure as you do for smart-card-based faregates... and practically speaking, it's a good idea to organize platform access in a similar way too, to make tapping-in/tapping-out simple[*] for passengers. In other words, smart-card-based POP essentially needs "optional" faregates (which pass-holders can bypass). [For systems where 95% of the passengers are using a pass, you can more or less skimp on the card readers -- but hopefully these systems have aspirations to serve more than just commuters!] -miles -- .... reality itself is blind unintelligent force, and it is only a fluke, it is only as a result of pure chances, that resulting from the exuberance of this energy there are people, with values, with reason, with languages, with cultures, ... and with love. Just a fluke. [Alan Watts, "The Ceramic and the Fully Automatic"] |
#198
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For many systems, I'm not sure it makes all that much difference: as
soon as a large percentage of the passengers have to "tap-in / tap-out", then you need pretty much exactly the same infrastructure as you do for smart-card-based faregates... and practically speaking, it's a good idea to organize platform access in a similar way too, to make tapping-in/tapping-out simple[*] for passengers. In other words, smart-card-based POP essentially needs "optional" faregates (which pass-holders can bypass). The question was whether currently ungated systems would have to install gates on all the platforms which would mean closing off other access, potentially a lot of construction work if the platforms don't have walls or fences now. It can also lead to some annoying results, e.g., since they added faregates to the train station in Cambridge UK, you now can't get to the toilets without a ticket. That's not policy, it's just that the toilets open onto the gated platform rather than the ungated ticket hall. At the Caltrain stations, the platforms are wide open, and all they did to handle Clipper cards was to install one or two parking meter sized tap readers on each platform. R's, John |
#199
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not an FTC rule. It's a US DOT rule, according to several news
articles I've read. No, it is NOT acceptable to list the price, net of taxes and fees, in large type, with the total price in small type. The new rule on advertising total prices including taxes and fees takes effect on the 26th. I cannot find anything similar for hotel quotes, though. In America, on goods subject to sales taxes, practically 100% of pricing is always without local, state taxes. They are added at the time of payment. In Canada, because we have a value added tax and depending on what province you live in as it varies, shown prices will not include federal and provincial taxes. These are also added at the time of payment. -- Cheers. Roger Traviss Photos of the late HO scale GER: - http://www.greateasternrailway.com For more photos not in the above album and kitbashes etc..:- http://s94.photobucket.com/albums/l9...Great_Eastern/ |
#200
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Roland Perry wrote: There are also millions of merchants who don't accept credit cards. And plenty of folks in far flung countries who'll take dollars in cash. The times I have spent in Africa, with the exception of South Africa the US dollar was far more accepted than local cash, and in many locations cards impossible to use. Of course, those are particular circumstances compared to, say, Europe or Canada. However, despite complaints that Europe or USA's economy is terrible, more than 50% of the worlds population lives in conditions that are closer to that found in rural Africa than the USA or Europe. -- Please note this e-mail address is a pit of spam due to e-mail address harvesters on Usenet. Response time to e-mail sent here is slow. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|