Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#891
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 16:00:09 on Mon, 19 Mar
2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked: It's not the kind of secret that would keep very well. There are plenty of reasons for everyone (both the criminals and the banks) to keep such a success very, very secret. They might try to, but I'm sure they'd fail. If the criminals and the banks conspired together such that only the banks saw any financial loss, then they might get away with it (although it would be simpler for the banks just to pay the criminals direct). Otherwise there will be third parties seeing losses, and questions would be asked. -- Roland Perry |
#892
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 15:13:45 on Mon, 19 Mar
2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked: If you prefer something more concrete, consider the UK has a land area of 243,610 km^2--slightly smaller than Oregon, our 9th-largest state, and 1/37th that of the entire US. Having spent quite a bit of time in Texas, I prefer to think of the UK as being able to fit inside it. Think of this in terms of having free pan-EU roaming vs. your current national service, with your service location only determining which country code your number is from. On PAYG rates, since last year it's broadly similar in cost to use a mobile anywhere in the EU now. Partly because regulators capped the maximum roaming charge, but also because operators increased costs of intra-UK calling to compensate. One day we may see the same for "bundled minutes", it's not a technical thing - the networks are pan-European, just commerce. -- Roland Perry |
#893
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 20/03/2012 07:54, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 15:13:45 on Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked: If you prefer something more concrete, consider the UK has a land area of 243,610 km^2--slightly smaller than Oregon, our 9th-largest state, and 1/37th that of the entire US. Having spent quite a bit of time in Texas, I prefer to think of the UK as being able to fit inside it. Think of this in terms of having free pan-EU roaming vs. your current national service, with your service location only determining which country code your number is from. On PAYG rates, since last year it's broadly similar in cost to use a mobile anywhere in the EU now. Partly because regulators capped the maximum roaming charge, but also because operators increased costs of intra-UK calling to compensate. One day we may see the same for "bundled minutes", it's not a technical thing - the networks are pan-European, just commerce. Though the big communications groups don't necessarily have a presence in each country (e.g. France Telecom/ Orange has no presence in Germany, and Deutsche Telekom/ T-Mobile has no presence in France). But yes, it's more a commerce thing. |
#894
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20/03/2012 07:37, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:57:57 on Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked: (On another note, I flew Transatlantic with such an airline last year, and did wonder how they cope with unaccompanied minors, who almost certainly won't have any cards). Just tell minors to use their cash to buy a gift card before they board. Eventually you may come to accept that gift cards like that are only available in the USA. It's been mentioned half a dozen times already, but maybe if we keep saying it you'll believe it. They can buy the cards at the airport before they leave on an eastbound transatlantic (or westbound transpacific) flight. Some people start transatlantic trips from Europe. Strange, I know. How long do you think it'll take until such cards are available at the other end of those flights? It's not a difficult concept to grasp. While a lot of US-invented financial initiatives do find there way over here (even sub-prime mortgages) I'm not sure those giftcards will. It seems to be important to the various stores that they are "tied" to a particular outlet, or even a particular range of goods, and so the current extensive (non-credit card) mag-stripe gift card scheme may continue indefinitely. There might be some regulatory issues too. Do European banks not have the concept of secondary cards? Each gets their own card with their own name on it, and they're linked to a common account, but secondary card holders are _not_ signatories to the card contract and therefore are not legally liable for payment--which means they can be minors. I think secondary card holders in the UK are *jointly* liable, therefore as a result there's not much point in having a secondary card rather than a 'primary' one in your own name. I don't think that's right. e.g. Barclaycard Visa T&Cs http://www.barclaycard.co.uk/visaterms.pdf ---quote--- 14 ADDITIONAL CARDHOLDERS 14.1 Unless we tell you otherwise, you can ask us to issue an additional card to any person you nominate as long as they are eligible for a card. 14.2 You are responsible for all use of your account by an additional cardholder, even if they do something which makes you break this Agreement. You must ensure that the additional cardholder uses the card according to the terms of this Agreement. 14.3 If you want to cancel any additional card, you are responsible for returning the card to us. ---/quote--- I agree that it's not all that common here for parents to make their children an additional cardholder. Obviously, one wouldn't open an account for a single trip. However, millions of teens _already_ have cards, including minors, and can use them on said trip. UMs can be any age. A few of the teens many have debit cards, but it's very unusual in the UK for under 16's. Less unusual these days - e.g. see the "11-15 years old" tab he http://www.lloydstsb.com/current_accounts/under_19s_account.asp Those who are flying regularly, particularly internationally, are probably _most_ likely to have cards. They are more likely, I agree, especially after they've been caught out on the first trip. |
#895
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 10:22:51 on Tue, 20 Mar
2012, Mizter T remarked: http://www.barclaycard.co.uk/visaterms.pdf ---quote--- 14 ADDITIONAL CARDHOLDERS 14.1 Unless we tell you otherwise, you can ask us to issue an additional card to any person you nominate as long as they are eligible for a card. Is there any information about eligibility (eg being over 18 etc)? -- Roland Perry |
#896
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 20/03/2012 06:25, Neil Williams wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:28:32 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T wrote: NDS VideoGuard encryption (BSkyB) is pretty secure. The old analogue VideoCrypt system wasn't and was widely hacked. True - the vulnerability thereof provided something of an extra motivation to them in migrating customers over to their new digital platform. The encryption system really is part of the crown jewels of BSkyB - the whole business rests or falls by it. |
#897
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 20/03/2012 10:35, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 10:22:51 on Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Mizter T remarked: http://www.barclaycard.co.uk/visaterms.pdf ---quote--- 14 ADDITIONAL CARDHOLDERS 14.1 Unless we tell you otherwise, you can ask us to issue an additional card to any person you nominate as long as they are eligible for a card. Is there any information about eligibility (eg being over 18 etc)? Here's an APACS guide called "Using cards: a guide for parents" on the UK Card Association website: http://preview.tinyurl.com/7cl673q See the FAQs on the last page... ---quote--- Can someone under 18 get a credit card? Yes but not usually in their own right. People under 18 can be given a credit card as an additional cardholder. The main reason why they are not usually granted access to credit themselves is that, under existing legislation, under-18-year-olds do not have the capacity to enter into a contract, which is a pre-requisite for a credit product. ---/quote--- Also on the right hand side under "Which plastic cards are available to young people?", and the "18 and over" sub-heading: ---quote--- Credit cards Under 18s can normally only get a credit card as an additional cardholder – for example on a parent’s credit card account. This age group are not usually granted access to credit themselves because, under existing legislation, under-18-year-olds do not have the capacity to enter into a contract, which is a pre-requisite for a credit product. Some credit card companies, however, will not give credit cards to under-18s even as additional cardholders. Charge cards The same rules apply to charge cards as to credit cards. Store cards The same rules usually apply to store cards as to credit and charge cards. Store cards The same rules usually apply to store cards as to credit and charge cards. ---/quote--- All that said, I think a great many credit card providers in the UK will only provide additional cards to those 18 and over - that's certainly what a quick google seems to suggest. |
#898
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 12:38:11 on Tue, 20 Mar
2012, Mizter T remarked: ---quote--- Credit cards Under 18s can normally only get a credit card as an additional cardholder – for example on a parent’s credit card account. This age group are not usually granted access to credit themselves because, under existing legislation, under-18-year-olds do not have the capacity to enter into a contract, which is a pre-requisite for a credit product. Some credit card companies, however, will not give credit cards to under-18s even as additional cardholders. Charge cards The same rules apply to charge cards as to credit cards. Unfortunately that last part is completely wrong (which is an issue because it's the very thing this thread has been about). Solo and Electron (and now VISA Debit) are precisely the debit cards which *are* given to under 18's in their own right in the UK. -- Roland Perry |
#899
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 20/03/2012 12:52, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 12:38:11 on Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Mizter T remarked: ---quote--- Credit cards Under 18s can normally only get a credit card as an additional cardholder – for example on a parent’s credit card account. This age group are not usually granted access to credit themselves because, under existing legislation, under-18-year-olds do not have the capacity to enter into a contract, which is a pre-requisite for a credit product. Some credit card companies, however, will not give credit cards to under-18s even as additional cardholders. Charge cards The same rules apply to charge cards as to credit cards. Unfortunately that last part is completely wrong (which is an issue because it's the very thing this thread has been about). Solo and Electron (and now VISA Debit) are precisely the debit cards which *are* given to under 18's in their own right in the UK. I disagree it's wrong - "charge cards" (in UK parlance at least) do not include debit cards. Charge cards are things like Amex - get a bill, pay it all at the end of the billing month. The document makes clear that debit cards can be issued without age restrictions - again from the last page: ---quote--- No age restrictions Debit cards These are only issued when linked to a bank or building society account, usually a current account. As under- 18s do not have the capacity to enter into a contract, banks and building societies do not usually permit this age group to have an overdraft. Some debit cards, such as Solo or Visa Electron, require all transactions to be authorised against money already in the account, which prevents the cardholder going overdrawn. Debit cards will also allow you to use a cash machine. ---/quote--- |
#900
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ...
What I agree we didn't get to the bottom of is how the card companies can issue 'normal' VISA debit cards while also promising the cardholder that they (the cardholder) will not be allowed to overdraw. -- Roland Perry The same way they could hand out cheque books with £50 cheque guarantee cards (cgc). I once opened a bank account with £1 and received a cheque book containing 30 cheques plus a £50 cgc. Maybe it was because I worked for a company known as Access. Richard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|