My eyes are wide open. I deal with the police occasionally though rarely
in criminal matters. Your feverish over-generalisation does not describe
the police officers I meet.

On 24/05/2012 14:53, d wrote:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Mark_Duggan

"Unnamed police sources claimed

Where do such things come on the scale between "someone's written on the
toilet wall", "the Daily Mail said", "a bloke in the pub once told my
mate" and "a good service is operating on all lines"?


--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

On 24/05/2012 12:27, d wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:34:48 GMT
wrote:
involved - it rather gives the impression the police can kill with
impunity.


What , you mean "innocent" people such as that gun carrying ganster scum
like Mark Duggan? If the police shot more people like him it might improve
the lives of the law abiding living in places like Tottenham. Machine gunning
any more rioters would help too as you could get rid of 90% of the scum in
one go.

B2003

Caught any good billygoats lately?

--
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman

On 24/05/2012 14:45, d wrote:

The example that springs to mind is that of a Brazillian electrician
who dared to travel on a tube train.

Ah well, if he hadn't stayed working here illegally after his visa ran out
he'd still be alive. However Duggan was known to the police who knew he
carried so they had an excuse.

B2003


So they can ice anyone they know is packing heat, or what?



--
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman

On 24/05/2012 13:27, 77002 wrote:
On May 24, 12:27 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:34:48 GMT

wrote:
involved - it rather gives the impression the police can kill with
impunity.

What , you mean "innocent" people such as that gun carrying ganster scum
like Mark Duggan? If the police shot more people like him it might improve
the lives of the law abiding living in places like Tottenham. Machine gunning
any more rioters would help too as you could get rid of 90% of the scum in
one go.

Now, now Boltar, don't be winding the liberals up. Never mind Justice
for victims, we must shower pity on the crims.

Riots? The police should protect property outside the riot zone. The
army can take car of the scum. One verbal warning, one warning
(blanks into the air) volley, then one real volley, end of riot, QED.

Wind who up? Why don't both of you stick your heads down the nearest
bog and pull the chain?

--
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman

On 24/05/2012 14:51, Graeme Wall wrote:


You've not seen when the Bingo chucks out on a Saturday night then?

The former Essoldo in Gainsborough, you don't want to be there.

--
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman

On 24/05/2012 14:05, Stephen Furley wrote:
On May 24, 12:27 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:34:48 GMT

wrote:
involved - it rather gives the impression the police can kill with
impunity.

What , you mean "innocent" people such as that gun carrying ganster scum
like Mark Duggan? If the police shot more people like him it might improve
the lives of the law abiding living in places like Tottenham. Machine gunning
any more rioters would help too as you could get rid of 90% of the scum in
one go.

B2003

I take it you mean the Mark Duggan who was proved to be unarmed, and
who was killed by a shot from police scum who then lied about the
circumstances. They claimed that one of their men had been fired at
by Mr Duggan, but a round found embedded in a police radio was proved
to have been fired from a police weapon. I take it that you would
have no objection to the police killing you and then lying about the
circumstances if they choose to do so?

They also lied about the Brazilian electrician, he did not vault over
the ticket gates, and the last time I looked vaulting over ticket
gates wasn't a capital offence in this country.

They also lied about the man who died, though probably not as a direct
result of, being pushed over by them during a demonstration in which
he was not taking part in London.

The British police are lying, cheating, dishonest, corrupt scum, and I
wish people would open their eyes and see this for themselves.


I don't think this is true of the majority, but they won't turn the bad
eggs in through misplaced loyalty and, in the present climate, concern
for people's livelihoods.


--
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman

On 24/05/2012 15:43, d wrote:

Not good at spotting a **** take are you. Another thick witted humourless
lefty.

B2003


That's because it isn't a **** take. You are a fascist ****, and
probably have the malfunction I have already adumbrated.



--
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman

On 25/05/2012 07:51, Martin Edwards wrote:
On 24/05/2012 15:43, d wrote:

Not good at spotting a **** take are you. Another thick witted humourless
lefty.

B2003


That's because it isn't a **** take.

Err... actually it /was/ a **** take.

--
Graeme Wall
This account not read, substitute trains for rail.
Railway Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail

On Fri, 25 May 2012 07:51:09 +0100
Martin Edwards wrote:
On 24/05/2012 15:43, d wrote:

Not good at spotting a **** take are you. Another thick witted humourless
lefty.

B2003


That's because it isn't a **** take. You are a fascist ****, and
probably have the malfunction I have already adumbrated.

Fascist? Right, because maxist revolutionaries never suggesting shooting
crowds did they. (That was sarcasm by the way since you clearly don't pick
up on it). Except that in their case it was usually innocent protestors, not
violent rioters rioting for no other reason that to cause trouble.

B2003