![]() |
|
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
I've just been listening to Ken Livingstone and Steve Norris
on LBC chatting about the possible bus drivers' strike. This has been brought about by the demand from the trade union UNITE that bus drivers should be paid a bonus in recognition of the stress and extra work during the Olympics and the bus companies' refusal even to discuss the matter with UNITE. The conversation was very interesting and drew a varied response from the listeners. One point which came up repeatedly was that of all the transport workers, bus drivers will experience the most stress during the Olympics and that if train drivers receive a bonus, so should bus drivers. Any bus passengers have a view on this? |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In message , at 13:42:30 on Sat, 16
Jun 2012, Robin9 remarked: One point which came up repeatedly was that of all the transport workers, bus drivers will experience the most stress during the Olympics and that if train drivers receive a bonus, so should bus drivers. I thought the train drivers were getting a bonus for agreeing not to go on strike, and working more flexible hours. Or are these defined as "stress" today? -- Roland Perry |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
"Robin9" wrote in message ... I've just been listening to Ken Livingstone and Steve Norris on LBC chatting about the possible bus drivers' strike. This has been brought about by the demand from the trade union UNITE that bus drivers should be paid a bonus in recognition of the stress and extra work during the Olympics and the bus companies' refusal even to discuss the matter with UNITE. The conversation was very interesting and drew a varied response from the listeners. One point which came up repeatedly was that of all the transport workers, bus drivers will experience the most stress during the Olympics and that if train drivers receive a bonus, so should bus drivers. Any bus passengers have a view on this? Train drivers shouldn't receive a bonus either. Next question? -- Brian "Fight like the Devil, die like a gentleman." |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On 16/06/2012 13:42, Robin9 wrote:
I've just been listening to Ken Livingstone and Steve Norris on LBC chatting about the possible bus drivers' strike. This has been brought about by the demand from the trade union UNITE that bus drivers should be paid a bonus in recognition of the stress and extra work during the Olympics and the bus companies' refusal even to discuss the matter with UNITE. The conversation was very interesting and drew a varied response from the listeners. One point which came up repeatedly was that of all the transport workers, bus drivers will experience the most stress during the Olympics and that if train drivers receive a bonus, so should bus drivers. Any bus passengers have a view on this? Well - it's yet to be proven how much additional ridership and effort it will be. The other thing to note that with the increase in capacity on certain routes I'd have assumed that there may well be greater opportunities for drivers to earn overtime and so on (giving them greater income anyway). Also, given that I assume bus drivers are paid based on time rather than miles driven then what exactly is there additional workload over and above their potential extra time getting to their depots or other driver changeover points (the majority of which are not in the key central areas which are going to be heavily affected by the Olympics in general). In fact, the people who are primarily going to be affected are the usual passengers with journeys taking longer, less opportunity to get a seat and so on - are we to be compensated with lower fares as our bonus? Thought no. Of course, absolutely the same applies to train drivers and workers on the DLR and so on - the only rationale for the bonus is essentially a bung to try and make sure they do their contracted job correctly and don't attempt to cripple London by striking during a time when it is key to showcase the City (for everyone). |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On 2012\06\16 13:42, Robin9 wrote:
I've just been listening to Ken Livingstone and Steve Norris on LBC chatting about the possible bus drivers' strike. This has been brought about by the demand from the trade union UNITE that bus drivers should be paid a bonus in recognition of the stress and extra work during the Olympics and the bus companies' refusal even to discuss the matter with UNITE. The conversation was very interesting and drew a varied response from the listeners. One point which came up repeatedly was that of all the transport workers, bus drivers will experience the most stress during the Olympics and that if train drivers receive a bonus, so should bus drivers. I don't see how bus drivers will undergo any stress. They'll be stuck in more jams, but I have never seen a bus driver blamed by passengers for a jam, and I presume they won't be blamed by their managers either. Taxi drivers and minicab drivers are the only transport workers who will suffer stress during the Olympics. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In message , at 17:31:08 on Sat, 16
Jun 2012, Steve Fitzgerald ] remarked: I thought the train drivers were getting a bonus for agreeing not to go on strike, and working more flexible hours. Or are these defined as "stress" today? The agreement that I'm aware of was to 'buy' the drivers out of longstanding agreements in the interests of flexibility. Temporary longer shifts and later finishes. There was no 'no strike' deal. I must stop reading the telegraph, and go back to the Daily Mail ;) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oly...be-drivers-to- get-1800-bonus-not-to-strike-during-the-Olympics.html -- Roland Perry |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:46:10 +0100, Someone Somewhere
wrote: On 16/06/2012 13:42, Robin9 wrote: I've just been listening to Ken Livingstone and Steve Norris on LBC chatting about the possible bus drivers' strike. This has been brought about by the demand from the trade union UNITE that bus drivers should be paid a bonus in recognition of the stress and extra work during the Olympics and the bus companies' refusal even to discuss the matter with UNITE. The conversation was very interesting and drew a varied response from the listeners. One point which came up repeatedly was that of all the transport workers, bus drivers will experience the most stress during the Olympics and that if train drivers receive a bonus, so should bus drivers. Any bus passengers have a view on this? Well - it's yet to be proven how much additional ridership and effort it will be. The other thing to note that with the increase in capacity on certain routes I'd have assumed that there may well be greater opportunities for drivers to earn overtime and so on (giving them greater income anyway). Also, given that I assume bus drivers are paid based on time rather than miles driven then what exactly is there additional workload over and above their potential extra time getting to their depots or other driver changeover points (the majority of which are not in the key central areas which are going to be heavily affected by the Olympics in general). In fact, the people who are primarily going to be affected are the usual passengers with journeys taking longer, less opportunity to get a seat and so on - are we to be compensated with lower fares as our bonus? Thought no. Of course, absolutely the same applies to train drivers and workers on the DLR and so on - the only rationale for the bonus is essentially a bung to try and make sure they do their contracted job correctly and don't attempt to cripple London by striking during a time when it is key to showcase the City (for everyone). I thought LU drivers were paid salaries, not hours+overtime, so the bonus is to compensate for the extra hours and shift flexibility during the Olympics. But bus drivers do get overtime, so that's how they should earn extra money for any extra time worked. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On Saturday, 16 June 2012 13:42:30 UTC+1, Robin9 wrote:
Any bus passengers have a view on this? I have strong and interesting views on this but I am not a bus passenger. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On 16/06/2012 22:34, Steve Fitzgerald wrote:
In message , Recliner writes I thought LU drivers were paid salaries, not hours+overtime, so the bonus is to compensate for the extra hours and shift flexibility during the Olympics. But bus drivers do get overtime, so that's how they should earn extra money for any extra time worked. Indeed, and there is no voluntary overtime. For example, my last pay period I received about £5 for overtime due to late running. There is no opportunity to supplement this. The 'bonus' is solely to buy out of the current agreements for the period of sports day. Any hours worked outside of the current agreement during this time will be paid extra too; the aggregate of this is what the papers like to present as fact. Isn't the lack of overtime due to agreements with the unions anyway to ensure everyone gets the most money, no individual may be favoured and the maximum amount of staffing exists to cover the work needed as unexpected absences can't be dealt with by others doing overtime? And, if you're getting paid for any hours worked outside of the current agreement, what is the perceived need for the "bonus" - solely the flexibility that most workers are expected to have anyway? |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In message , at 20:41:40 on Sat, 16
Jun 2012, Steve Fitzgerald ] remarked: The agreement that I'm aware of was to 'buy' the drivers out of longstanding agreements in the interests of flexibility. Temporary longer shifts and later finishes. There was no 'no strike' deal. I must stop reading the telegraph, and go back to the Daily Mail ;) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oly...be-drivers-to- get-1800-bonus-not-to-strike-during-the-Olympics.html Yes you must; maybe ask someone who actually knows and not trust the bull**** in the media! After all, I'm only a lowly union rep. Then you've got a problem (maybe deliberately fostered by the employers) that the public *think* there's a no-strike deal and won't be very sympathetic if there is one. Not that they are very sympathetic anyway, even when there isn't an Olympics happening. -- Roland Perry |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In message , at 22:34:38 on Sat, 16
Jun 2012, Steve Fitzgerald ] remarked: The 'bonus' is solely to buy out of the current agreements for the period of sports day. Any hours worked outside of the current agreement during this time will be paid extra too; the aggregate of this is what the papers like to present as fact I'm puzzled. You seem to resent the fact you don't normally get overtime, and yet demand a lump sum in order to agree to be paid overtime during the games? That's the kind of "having cake and eating it" which gives unions a bad name. -- Roland Perry |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In message , at
23:11:23 on Sat, 16 Jun 2012, Offramp remarked: Any bus passengers have a view on this? I have strong and interesting views on this but I am not a bus passenger. It's difficult to type on the bus, I expect most people wait until they get home. -- Roland Perry |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In message , at 09:11:26 on Sun, 17
Jun 2012, Steve Fitzgerald ] remarked: I'm puzzled. You seem to resent the fact you don't normally get overtime, and yet demand a lump sum in order to agree to be paid overtime during the games? I didn't say the hours were extra; just outside the agreement, ie working later (but starting later) or 9 hour shifts, which are balanced by shorter shifts elsewhere. This flexibility is what is being paid for. Something else the telegraph got wrong... "But in an agreement with Aslef, the train drivers’ union, they will also receive increased overtime payments if they work more than an eight-hour shift or later than 1.30am – meaning they could earn an extra £1,800 on average. I don't resent at all the no-overtime deals. I rather like being able to do my day's work and not have to stay behind a few hours. Yes, I know that people have different views on this, but a train driver isn't a 9-5 desk job, and some inherent flexibility would seem to "go with the territory". It's not as if (working in London) you are in danger of missing the last train home (unless you are driving it, of course, when I expect they'll pay for a taxi). -- Roland Perry |
Quote:
|
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In message , at 14:23:46 on Sun, 17
Jun 2012, Steve Fitzgerald ] remarked: about 3 hours if I use the staff taxi network which has to be pre-booked. They don't pay for taxis otherwise. I choose (and pay) to use my own transport in these circumstances for my convenience of being home in 30 minutes. Do the staff taxis transport you the "long way round", or are you waiting for them most of that time? -- Roland Perry |
Quote:
during the Olympics, not more. There's a time bomb waiting to go off and I suspect most Londoners are not yet aware of it. This time bomb is called Olympic Lanes. In at least some locations, these Olympic Lanes will at peak times cause chaos, including chaos for bus passengers and the emergency services. The Olympic Lanes are designated lanes set aside exclusively for the use of Olympic athletes and officials. Buses and taxis will not be allowed to travel in Olympic lanes. So far, so bad. It gets worse. Unlike the position with bus lanes, it will be illegal to cross an Olympic Lane. Whereas with a bus lane a vehicle may cross the lane to turn either right or left, that is not permissable with an Olympic lane. Instead the hapless motorist must proceed, possibly for a mile or two, until the Olympic lane ends and then make a wide detour without crossing any other Olympic Lane to arrive back where he wanted to be. Compounding this formula for chaos is another feature. At certain major road junctions, Olympic Lanes will be imposed, forbidding other vehicles from entering and exiting. Two examples. 1) The Green Man Roundabout in Leytonstone. This is a major junction and straddles the A12 dual carriageway between outer East London and the Blackwall Tunnel. It is a very busy roundabout. During the Olympics, motorists heading towards the Blackwall Tunnel will not be allowed to join the A12 from The Green Man. In the morning rush hour this will cause massive traffic congestion. I suspect the whole area will seize up. Motorists needing to access the A12 will have to improvise. Most will aim for the Redbridge Roundabout which is already hugely over-subscribed during the morning peak. Some, aiming for Hackney, will try Lee Bridge Road via Whipps Cross Road. However Lee Bridge Road is already hopelesly inadequate during the morning peak. (Thank you TfL for sabotaging Lee Bridge Road and reducing its capacity enormously) So it is almost certain that Lee Bridge Road and Whipps Cross Road will come to a standstill. I'd feel sorry for any taxi or private hire driver who has to take someone to Whipps Cross Hospital beween 7 and 10 0-clock. 2) Hackney Marshes. This A12 junction is adjacent to the Olympic Park and only Olympic athletes and officials will be allowed to exit from the A12 during the Olympics. Motorists coming to Hackney via the Blackwall Tunnel will presumably come off the A12 either at Old Ford - already overloaded during the morning rush hour and soon to be worse: yes TfL are installing traffic lights to reduce capacity still further - or at The Green Man (see above). Motorists from the other direction will presumably come off at Old Ford and try their luck. There is no chance at all of Old Ford being able during the morning peak to handle "refugee" traffic from the Hackney Marshes junction in addition to the usual traffic volume. I'd feel sorry for any taxi or private hire driver taking someone to the London Chest Hospital beween 7 and 10 0-clock. Unless there is a huge reduction in normal traffic, for example everyone taking their holiday during the Olympics, complete gridlock in Leytonstone and Old Ford is inevitable during the morning peak. Many taxi drivers are taking an extended holiday during the Olympics because they believe it will be impossible to move about and earn money. Many minicab drivers intend to boycott the Olympics because they cannot afford to be stuck in traffic jams. If there is not the required enormous reduction in road traffic and chaos does result, the likely "legacy" of the Olympics will be that many Londoners will hate the Olympic Games more intensely than they ever hated anything else. It is most unlikely that many taxi or private hire drivers will look back with any affection. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In article ,
Offramp wrote: On Saturday, 16 June 2012 13:42:30 UTC+1, Robin9 wrote: Any bus passengers have a view on this? I have strong and interesting views on this but I am not a bus passenger. The man not on the Clapham omnibus ? Nick -- "The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life" -- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996 |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On Jun 17, 2:23*pm, Steve Fitzgerald ] wrote:
In message , Roland Perry writes Something else the telegraph got wrong... * * * *"But in an agreement with Aslef, the train drivers’ union, * * * *they will also receive increased overtime payments if they work * * * *more than an eight-hour shift or later than 1.30am – meaning * * * *they could earn an extra £1,800 on average. I think the key word here is *if* they work. *That is basically correct, although the expectation is that we are unlikely to get more than one or two of these duties allocated during the whole of the games. *The figure of £1800 assumes that a driver works outside the agreement every duty possible and every day. So that means the "on average" part is basically a lie? -- Abi |
It seems Boris has lost his nerve. He is now dangling several million
pounds under the noses of the various bus companies with the demand (i.e desperate plea) that they settle this dispute with the drivers to avoid the strike. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:42:30PM +0100, Robin9 wrote:
The conversation was very interesting and drew a varied response from the listeners. One point which came up repeatedly was that of all the transport workers, bus drivers will experience the most stress during the Olympics and that if train drivers receive a bonus, so should bus drivers. Any bus passengers have a view on this? Yes. I hope they don't get their bonus, and that they strike during the Olympics. I hope that as a consequence thousands of people - both spectators and participants - miss their events. Why? Well, I've paid for the damned games, and I want to get some entertainment out of it. -- David Cantrell | Godless Liberal Elitist Compromise: n: lowering my standards so you can meet them |
Quote:
Three bus companies are so reluctant to pay a bonus to their staff - even when the bonus is financed by the tax payer - that they have obtained an injunction from the High Court banning the strike. This of course increases the chances of a strike taking place during the Olympics. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On 16/06/2012 13:42, Robin9 wrote:
I've just been listening to Ken Livingstone and Steve Norris on LBC chatting about the possible bus drivers' strike Reduce working hours per driver (say 3 days a week), reducing the stress and employ more drivers all on part time or job share basis. Or sack the more vociferious idiots and give the others the pay increase together with longer working hours. Or.... line them up in front of their families and .... -- Adrian C |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:51:31PM +0100, Robin9 wrote:
David Cantrell;131512 Wrote: Any bus passengers have a view on this? Yes. I hope they don't get their bonus, and that they strike during the Olympics. I hope that as a consequence thousands of people - both spectators and participants - miss their events. Why? Well, I've paid for the damned games, and I want to get some entertainment out of it. Black humour is always better when it contain a grain of truth. I'm not joking. -- David Cantrell | Godless Liberal Elitist "There's a hole in my bucket, dear Liza, dear Liza." "WHAT MAKES YOU SAY THERE IS A HOLE IN YOUR BUCKET?" |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On 25/06/2012 17:42, David Cantrell wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:51:31PM +0100, Robin9 wrote: David Cantrell wrote: Any bus passengers have a view on this? Yes. I hope they don't get their bonus, and that they strike during the Olympics. I hope that as a consequence thousands of people - both spectators and participants - miss their events. Why? Well, I've paid for the damned games, and I want to get some entertainment out of it. Black humour is always better when it contain a grain of truth. I'm not joking. I've paid for Trident, and I want to get some entertainment out of it. Tehran seems a bit surplus to requirements, no? |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:10:37PM +0100, Mizter T wrote:
On 25/06/2012 17:42, David Cantrell wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:51:31PM +0100, Robin9 wrote: David Cantrell wrote: Any bus passengers have a view on this? Yes. I hope they don't get their bonus, and that they strike during the Olympics. I hope that as a consequence thousands of people - both spectators and participants - miss their events. Why? Well, I've paid for the damned games, and I want to get some entertainment out of it. Black humour is always better when it contain a grain of truth. I'm not joking. I've paid for Trident, and I want to get some entertainment out of it. Tehran seems a bit surplus to requirements, no? There are quite a few crucial differences. Amongst the biggest is that the Olympics are actually supposed to be fun. -- David Cantrell | London Perl Mongers Deputy Chief Heretic Featu an incorrectly implemented bug |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
In article ,
David Cantrell wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:10:37PM +0100, Mizter T wrote: On 25/06/2012 17:42, David Cantrell wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:51:31PM +0100, Robin9 wrote: David Cantrell wrote: Any bus passengers have a view on this? Yes. I hope they don't get their bonus, and that they strike during the Olympics. I hope that as a consequence thousands of people - both spectators and participants - miss their events. Why? Well, I've paid for the damned games, and I want to get some entertainment out of it. Black humour is always better when it contain a grain of truth. I'm not joking. I've paid for Trident, and I want to get some entertainment out of it. Tehran seems a bit surplus to requirements, no? There are quite a few crucial differences. Amongst the biggest is that the Olympics are actually supposed to be fun. But big bangs are fun ! Nick -- "The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life" -- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996 |
Boris the bungler has stirred things up by on the one hand
demanding that bus drivers give up their dispute and on the other giving Boris-bike workers a £500.00 Olympic bonus! I do hope someone asks him why bike workers deserve a better deal that bus drivers. Boris the buffoon is given too easy a ride by radio and TV interviewers. I'd like to see someone give him a good grilling. |
On "You And Yours" today, they had a report about foreign visitors
coming for the Olympics. Apparently hotel bookings so far are much lower than anticipated and it now looks as if the numbers coming will be way, way lower than predicted. This of course will be good news for people travelling by public transport but it will not reduce the consequences of Olympic lanes. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
Robin9 wrote on 28 June 2012
17:42:23 ... On "You And Yours" today, they had a report about foreign visitors coming for the Olympics. Apparently hotel bookings so far are much lower than anticipated and it now looks as if the numbers coming will be way, way lower than predicted. This of course will be good news for people travelling by public transport but it will not reduce the consequences of Olympic lanes. Yes, it will. If (and I doubt this) there are fewer visitors, there will be less traffic in the general traffic lanes, hence less congestion. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
It has been assumed by TfL and others that this will be a "public transport
Olympic Games." I understand that no car parks have been created for this reason. It is therefore unlikely that many foreign visitors will travel by car and consequently a reduction in foreign visitors will have little impact on traffic congestion. |
It is now evident that most motorists in London including taxi and
emergency services drivers have no idea when Olympic Lanes come into force and during which hours and on what days they will be in operation. This afternoon Petrie Hoskins - I hope I have spelled her name correctly - has conducted a phone-in programme on this subject and no-one, absolutely no-one, knew what was going on. Anger at TfL was general and unlimited. As Ken Livingstone and David Mellor were also pretty critical yesterday, it is quite likely that this is going to be a very hot potato in the next few weeks. I hope Boris gets dragged in. He won't have a clue. He'll flounder and flop and be shown up for what he is. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
Robin9 wrote on 15 July 2012
15:27:26 ... It is now evident that most motorists in London including taxi and emergency services drivers have no idea when Olympic Lanes come into force and during which hours and on what days they will be in operation. This afternoon Petrie Hoskins - I hope I have spelled her name correctly - has conducted a phone-in programme on this subject and no-one, absolutely no-one, knew what was going on. Anger at TfL was general and unlimited. People have no idea because it's not a simple question. Each Games Lane will be in operation for the days on which it is required. For example the M4 Games Lane from Heathrow (which operates from tomorrow, 16 July) doesn't have the same operating days/times as the Games Lane to Wimbledon for the Olympic tennis. This is no different from the way bus lanes are organised. If you asked me what the operating hours are for a random bus lane in London, I probably wouldn't know. So what? If I happened to need to drive in that part of London, I would look at the signs. Emergency service drivers on emergency calls don't need to know, as they can use the Games Lanes anyway. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
People have no idea, not because the issue is not simple but because they have
been given conflicting pieces of information. If you believe that there are "signs" in all the appropriate places providing accurate and up-to-the-minute information, you are sorely mistaken. An example: We have been told that the Olympic Lanes come into force today. This afternoon I was driving up Shooters Hill Road towards the Sun-In-The-Sands roundabout. Near the roundabout the off-side lane has been marked as an Olympic Lane. Was it in force this afternoon? I have no idea. Certainly there was no sign providing information nor has any sign been installed to provide information in the days ahead. So how are drivers to work it out by looking at the signs? |
Quote:
uninformative. It does not provide information about when specific Olympic Lanes will be in force. It merely advises that the Lanes in general will be in force some of the time. We all know that! Motorists want far more precise information. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 03:27:26PM +0100, Robin9 wrote:
It is now evident that most motorists in London including taxi and emergency services drivers have no idea when Olympic Lanes come into force ... It's great, I had a lane to myself for most of my two journeys across London on Saturday! Zoom! They should keep them after the Olympics and rename them Dave Lanes. After all, the proportion of Daves in the population is about the same as those going to the Olympics, and we're far more important than those overpaid sweaty oafs. -- David Cantrell | Nth greatest programmer in the world When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life -- Samuel Johnson |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
Robin9 wrote:.
This afternoon I was driving up Shooters Hill Road towards the Sun-In-The-Sands roundabout. Near the roundabout the off-side lane has been marked as an Olympic Lane. Was it in force this afternoon? I have no idea. Certainly there was no sign providing information nor has any sign been installed to provide information in the days ahead. So how are drivers to work it out by looking at the signs? That's odd. I drove up that road yesterday morning and there was an electronic sign saying that drivers should use the Games Lane. Tim (tm) |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:14:18 +0000 (UTC)
Tim Miller wrote: That's odd. I drove up that road yesterday morning and there was an electronic sign saying that drivers should use the Games Lane. Its supposed to be the 25th that they all come into force isn't it? Though I've seen some signs on the north circular saying 25th and others saying the 15th. As usual the Einsteins at TfL wouldn't even recognise their own arses, never mind being able to tell them from their elbows. B2003 |
Quote:
adjacent to most Olympic Lanes. So unless hundreds are installed in the next few days, when the lanes do come into force there will be no sign providing relevant information. |
Bus Drivers And The Olympics
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:25 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk