On Jul 9, 1:56*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 04:42:35 -0700 (PDT)





77002 wrote:
On Jul 9, 10:00=A0am, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:41:45 +0100

Martin Edwards wrote:
Well, in today's Daily Telegraph, under the heading: "Proud Supporter
Clegg flies the flag in Whitehall for Gay Pride weekend" it shows,
amongst others, a picture of "Mary Portas 'Queen of Shops' with her
pregnant partner Melanie Rickie...".

That took some balls...

But whose we will never know.

Hopefully the kid will one day and they don't try and keep him in their l=
ittle
fantasy land of 2 mothers and no father being normal.

Is it not the case that folks now have the legal right to know whom
are his, or her, natural parents?

Probably not until they're 16 or 18 I'd imagine. Assuming the father didn't
request anonymity. But its a bit late by then after they've probably
endured years at school of having the **** taken because of having 2 mummies.
If the gay lobby think gay is seen as normal amongst average teenagers
they're deluded.

Nearly two decades of two low self esteem women, and no father figure,
is a great start in life for a child.

On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 06:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
77002 wrote:
Nearly two decades of two low self esteem women, and no father figure,
is a great start in life for a child.

And we can see what happens when boys don't have an effective father figure
in their lives. Look at all the gangs on any sink estate.

B2003

On 08/07/2012 21:08, Bruce wrote:

... and a turkey baster.

I thought it were a job.

Cheers

mark-r

On 09/07/2012 10:00, d wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:41:45 +0100
Martin wrote:
Well, in today's Daily Telegraph, under the heading: "Proud Supporter
Clegg flies the flag in Whitehall for Gay Pride weekend" it shows,
amongst others, a picture of "Mary Portas 'Queen of Shops' with her
pregnant partner Melanie Rickie...".

That took some balls...


But whose we will never know.

Hopefully the kid will one day and they don't try and keep him in their little
fantasy land of 2 mothers and no father being normal.

B2003



Given the nature of human procreation it should become obvious after the
child's first couple of biology lessons - unless there's something that
"Mary is trying to keep from us?

--
Moving things in still pictures

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:07:45 +0100
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=AEi=A9ardo?= wrote:
Given the nature of human procreation it should become obvious after the
child's first couple of biology lessons - unless there's something that
"Mary is trying to keep from us?

Can you imagine how the child feels when realisation slowly dawns?

B2003

On 01/07/12 00:05, Bruce wrote:
Labour backs plans to return railway network to public control

If only they'd thought of that in 1997. What cretin wrote their
manifesto, eh?

Ian

On 09/07/12 12:42, 77002 wrote:
Is it not the case that folks now have the legal right to know whom
are his, or her, natural parents?

No. They still have to believe what the mother says.

Ian

On 09/07/12 15:16, d wrote:
Can you imagine how the child feels when realisation slowly dawns?

Unconcerned, I expect. It must have been much harder for everyone when
it became clear that Harry was a ginge like his father.

Ian

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:09:44 +0100, The Real Doctor
wrote:

On 09/07/12 12:42, 77002 wrote:
Is it not the case that folks now have the legal right to know whom
are his, or her, natural parents?

No. They still have to believe what the mother says.

As does the alleged father.

On 09/07/2012 16:07, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 01/07/12 00:05, Bruce wrote:
Labour backs plans to return railway network to public control

If only they'd thought of that in 1997. What cretin wrote their
manifesto, eh?

Ian


Well, they succeeded with the groundwork by shafting Railtrack by
refusing it funds and then setting up Network Rail by giving 20 times as
much.

--
Moving things in still pictures