Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:03:20 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 17:24:07 on Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Recliner remarked: [3] by which, of course, you mean "obviously disabled". Some people don't "look" disabled, but still find stairs difficult or impossible. There's also the halfway house of the many stations that have escalators rather than lifts: not very much use to wheelchair users, but very helpful to many other travellers who may have trouble with stairs, particularly when carrying luggage. Mindful that many stations with escalators (or indeed original lifts) aren't completely step-free, typically having a short flight of steps adjacent to the platform, and often a flight of steps to get from the ticket concourse to the roadway outside. Yes, usually caused by the fact that both lines had to be fitted under the roadway, leaving inadequate space for lifts or escalators between the lines, so the landings had to be above rather than between the platform tunnels. Less of a problem with new or rebuilt stations. But my point remains: as Boltar asserts in his inimitable way, there are few actual or even potential Tube pax who are completely confined to wheelchairs, but a much larger number who have limited mobility or are hauling luggage, pushchairs, etc. They can probably manage short staircases and escalators, but struggle with long staircases. |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is called humour, not trolling.
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport |