![]() |
So much for a 4% rise
When I used to use the NCR 4 evenings a week, it was shut between Edmonton and Walthamstow approximately 3-5% of the time. |
So much for a 4% rise
On 05/01/2013 11:20, tim..... wrote:
Try the section through Ealing and the junction with the A1, they are the pits Henlys Corner (the aforementioned junction with the A1) is pretty reasonable since they completed the remodelling work...at least at the times I usually pass through. Hanger Lane needs...well...I'm not sure what could be done to make it less worse really, given the presence of the A40 underpass as well. |
Quote:
over the roundabout would make a big difference. It would be a tight squeeze but it could just about be done. My experience of Henly's Corner is that during the peak periods the new layout has not made any improvement. Exactly the same with the Palmers Green/New Southgate scheme. |
So much for a 4% rise
Robin9 wrote:
Barry Salter;135293 Wrote: On 05/01/2013 11:20, tim..... wrote: - Try the section through Ealing and the junction with the A1, they are the pits - Henlys Corner (the aforementioned junction with the A1) is pretty reasonable since they completed the remodelling work...at least at the times I usually pass through. Hanger Lane needs...well...I'm not sure what could be done to make it less worse really, given the presence of the A40 underpass as well. A Gallows Corner type single-lane-in-each-direction flyover taking the A406 over the roundabout would make a big difference. It would be a tight squeeze but it could just about be done. My experience of Henly's Corner is that during the peak periods the new layout has not made any improvement. Exactly the same with the Palmers Green/New Southgate scheme. Would there be any point in having a southbound flyover, given that the road narrows in that direction anyway? |
I think so. The A406 carriageway towards Ealing Common remains two lanes
wide for quite a distance, just enough I calculate to "land" a single lane flyover with room for a lane leading off from the roundabout. Bear in mind that most of the traffic at present leaving the roundabout for Ealing has come off the A406. The benefit of such a flyover is that not only would it substantially reduce the total number of vehicles using the roundabout but, more crucially, it would reduce the number of vehicles stationary on the roundabout, stopped by infernal traffic lights and thereby impeding the flow of other traffic. But, as I said before, it would be a tight squeeze. |
So much for a 4% rise
On 2013\01\06 11:31, Robin9 wrote:
Barry Salter;135293 Wrote: On 05/01/2013 11:20, tim..... wrote: - Try the section through Ealing and the junction with the A1, they are the pits - Henlys Corner (the aforementioned junction with the A1) is pretty reasonable since they completed the remodelling work...at least at the times I usually pass through. Hanger Lane needs...well...I'm not sure what could be done to make it less worse really, given the presence of the A40 underpass as well. A Gallows Corner type single-lane-in-each-direction flyover taking the A406 over the roundabout would make a big difference. It would be a tight squeeze but it could just about be done. My experience of Henly's Corner is that during the peak periods the new layout has not made any improvement. Exactly the same with the Palmers Green/New Southgate scheme. Those schemes were not for cars but for pedestrians and cycles. If your experience is as a car user, you were never intended to see any improvement. I'd say they have made things worse, because I used to use the right turn from Natal Road to Bowes Road as part of a route which avoided the entire jam, and this is no longer allowed. |
So much for a 4% rise
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 00:29:33 +0000
Robin9 wrote: As a frequent and enthusiastic motorist, I agree that travelling by car is usually cheaper, quicker and more comfortable. That's why I despise those anti-motor car bigots who insist that no-one needs a motor car in London. They're usually the sort of people who live in the inner city and never need or want to travel more than a few miles from their ghettos. I am however surprised that you find the North Circular so bad. Although TfL's two enhancement projects have both turned out to be complete failures and a disgraceful waste of money, I still find the A406 a fairly good road. Living in Leyton, I am of course adjacent to the best stretch of the road. Well quite. But the sections near Bowes road , henleys corner and neasden are disaster areas in the rush hour. B2003 |
So much for a 4% rise
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:31:15 +0000
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 11:20:20 on Sat, 5 Jan 2013, tim..... remarked: I am however surprised that you find the North Circular so bad. Although TfL's two enhancement projects have both turned out to be complete failures and a disgraceful waste of money, I still find the A406 a fairly good road. Living in Leyton, I am of course adjacent to the best stretch of the road. precisely. Try the section through Ealing and the junction with the A1, they are the pits Hence the meme that the traffic news saying "avoid the North Circular" is futile, because anyone who can possibly avoid it, already is. The main problem is that there are relatively few roads that bridge the met line in north west longon which forces all the traffic that needs to go east-west or west-east to use the 406 or be squeezed onto the few local roads that also go over it. B2003 |
Quote:
the Palmers Green/New Southgate scheme was for the benefit of buses . . . oh and of course, this being a TfL scheme, for the benefit of two suppliers of traffic lights. By the way, I too used to make that right turn out of Natal Road. I now turn right at the bottom of Warwick Road. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk