![]() |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
In message , at 14:03:57 on
Thu, 10 Jan 2013, David Walters remarked: I've always understood that every station with "only" lifts also has emergency stairs (that may not be well signposted for regular use). And also some stations still have the stairs despite now being fitted with escalators (TCR springs to mind). I think that is true but some stations have escalators and no fixed stairs, assuming everything is working. The stairs at Angel still seem to be present but I think I'd cause a disturbance if I exited the platforms that way. I presume those would exit via the original entrance, which is some way round the corner from the present one. If you have a desire to avoid lifts and escalators then a lot of the underground is off limits and it is very hard to plan a route with available information. "Stairs only" is an unusual requirement, but I agree that information to deliver it is hard to find. -- Roland Perry |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
Two policemen have been clearing the roundabout directly above Old Street of tramps. For whatever reason they are Parks Police.
|
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
"David Walters" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:16:08 +0000, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 11:10:49 on Thu, 10 Jan 2013, David Walters remarked: 125. Nineteen stations just use lifts. They have stairs as well. A list I've been looking for but haven't been able to find is stations, or platforms really, that don't have publicly accessible stairs. I've always understood that every station with "only" lifts also has emergency stairs (that may not be well signposted for regular use). And also some stations still have the stairs despite now being fitted with escalators (TCR springs to mind). I think that is true but some stations have escalators and no fixed stairs, assuming everything is working. The stairs at Angel still seem to be present but I think I'd cause a disturbance if I exited the platforms that way. If you have a desire to avoid lifts and escalators then a lot of the underground is off limits and it is very hard to plan a route with available information. I can understand why someone might want to avoid lifts, But what possible (disability) reason is there for wanting to avoid escalators but are able to use stairs? tim |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:49:37 -0000, tim..... wrote:
"David Walters" wrote in message ... If you have a desire to avoid lifts and escalators then a lot of the underground is off limits and it is very hard to plan a route with available information. I can understand why someone might want to avoid lifts, But what possible (disability) reason is there for wanting to avoid escalators but are able to use stairs? The only disability reason for wanting to avoid lifts I can think of is claustrophobia. People might equally have a phobia of escalators (is there a name for that?), they can be fairly dangerous machines and have removed a toe from a user from time to time. I think that concern would be better addressed by wearing stout shoes but phobias aren't always very rational like that. I have my own slightly silly reasons for wanting to avoid lifts and escalators. I don't really think TfL should go out of their way to provide me with information to help but I thought I might find something on the Internet. So far I haven't. |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
On 10/01/2013 05:48, Basil Jet wrote:
On 2013\01\09 22:27, Recliner wrote: 36. The eastern extension of the Jubilee line is the only Underground line to feature glass screens to deter "jumpers". No, it's to do with ventilation. How so? --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
On 10/01/2013 06:48, Offramp wrote:
On Jan 9, 10:27 pm, Recliner wrote: 6. Many tube stations were used as air-raid shelters during the Second World War, but the Central Line was even converted into a fighter aircraft factory that stretched for over two miles, with its own railway system. Its existence remained an official secret until the 1980s. Sounds interesting! 10. The longest distance between stations is on the Metropolitan line from Chesham to Chalfont & Latimer: a total of only 3.89 miles. Really? Only 3.89? I personally thought that it was longer than 3.89. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
In message , at 21:13:40 on Thu, 10
Jan 2013, " remarked: 10. The longest distance between stations is on the Metropolitan line from Chesham to Chalfont & Latimer: a total of only 3.89 miles. Really? Only 3.89? I personally thought that it was longer than 3.89. Google maps says it's 4.1 miles by the slightly indirect road. -- Roland Perry |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
In message , at 21:11:51 on Thu, 10
Jan 2013, " remarked: 36. The eastern extension of the Jubilee line is the only Underground line to feature glass screens to deter "jumpers". No, it's to do with ventilation. How so? By keeping the track alongside the platform part of the same reasonably airtight tunnel as the rest of the running tracks, avoiding air 'escaping' into the platforms and beyond. -- Roland Perry |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
On 10/01/2013 15:17, Recliner wrote:
"Robin" wrote: snip Oddly, the only politician he criticised was the Labour transport minister who he said had shut the Ongar line (the politician in question is rather more famous for her previous career, Glenda Jackson). In fact, of course, it was closed in 1994, during the Major administration. Is Bob becoming a closet Tory? Possibly depends on the meaning of "shut"? I thought services stopped running in 1994 but that it was not until 1998, when Glenda Jackson was the junior Minister with responsibility for transport in London, that the line was sold. Ah, that explains it. But it had been formally closed before then, hadn't it? I wonder if urban sprawl would ever see the EOR operate any sort of regular service or if TfL would ever consider taking over that section once again. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts
" wrote:
On 10/01/2013 15:17, Recliner wrote: "Robin" wrote: snip Oddly, the only politician he criticised was the Labour transport minister who he said had shut the Ongar line (the politician in question is rather more famous for her previous career, Glenda Jackson). In fact, of course, it was closed in 1994, during the Major administration. Is Bob becoming a closet Tory? Possibly depends on the meaning of "shut"? I thought services stopped running in 1994 but that it was not until 1998, when Glenda Jackson was the junior Minister with responsibility for transport in London, that the line was sold. Ah, that explains it. But it had been formally closed before then, hadn't it? I wonder if urban sprawl would ever see the EOR operate any sort of regular service or if TfL would ever consider taking over that section once again. Only likely if Green Belt policies are relaxed, leading to a lot more development in the Ongar area. But, even if that did happen, the Central line is a pretty slow way to get to central London from that part of Essex. I'm still pondering over why Bob Crow attacked Labour rather than the Tories for closing the line. And when asked whether he agreed with one of Boris's bullish descriptions of London, he couldn't have been moe positive. No attacks on the concept of driverless trains, or supposed safety issues, or refusal to meet unions, etc. I doubt that many members of the cabinet would have been as enthusiastic about Boris and his plans. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk