![]() |
|
Rotherhithe tunnel
On 2013-03-20 11:44:29 +0000, Basil Jet said:
Some or all of the traffic light system is definitely designed to prevent traffic flow rather than aid it, even in places where there are essentially no pedestrians (the slow lights at the junction of Montague Street and Russell Square can have no other explanation). Indeed - they are out to get us, if not by sedation in the water supply by traffic lights. E. |
Rotherhithe tunnel
On 2013\03\20 12:04, eastender wrote:
On 2013-03-20 11:44:29 +0000, Basil Jet said: Some or all of the traffic light system is definitely designed to prevent traffic flow rather than aid it, even in places where there are essentially no pedestrians (the slow lights at the junction of Montague Street and Russell Square can have no other explanation). Indeed - they are out to get us, if not by sedation in the water supply by traffic lights. Deviated prevert. |
Rotherhithe tunnel
In article ,
Basil Jet wrote: On 2013\03\20 12:04, eastender wrote: On 2013-03-20 11:44:29 +0000, Basil Jet said: Some or all of the traffic light system is definitely designed to prevent traffic flow rather than aid it, even in places where there are essentially no pedestrians (the slow lights at the junction of Montague Street and Russell Square can have no other explanation). Indeed - they are out to get us, if not by sedation in the water supply by traffic lights. Deviated prevert. Oh, stop worrying. Nick -- "The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life" -- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996 |
Rotherhithe tunnel
In article ,
(Basil Jet) wrote: On 2013\03\20 11:37, d wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:17:13 +0000 Robin9 wrote: d;136593 Wrote: So there's already pressure on thames river crossings in the east and TfL just go and make it even worse. Seriously, there should be a medal for an organisation this stupid. It isn't stupidity. It's malice and mischievousness, and it has been since TfL was first established. I wouldn't put it beyond the bounds of reason to assume that causing gridlock is a cynical way of getting people onto public transport. And hence more money in TfLs coffers. Some or all of the traffic light system is definitely designed to prevent traffic flow rather than aid it, even in places where there are essentially no pedestrians (the slow lights at the junction of Montague Street and Russell Square can have no other explanation). Those are a serious pain to me as a cyclist on occasion. Colin Rosenstiel |
Quote:
several previous posts described as "sabotaging of London's road system" by TfL, in this case with the full cooperation of Camden Council. Before TfL, when London's Red Routes were controlled by The Department of Transport, there was a gyratory system round Russell Square and only one set of traffic lights. The whole route from Euston Station to the Aldwych and across Waterloo Bridge was a good, fairly free flowing road. Then TfL decided to ruin it and, of course, install numerous new traffic lights plus a conflicting traffic flow. I must admit it hadn't occurred to me that cyclists too are inconvenienced by TfL's vandalism. Thank you for that. I long for the day when at last London has a Mayor who has the guts, the brains and the sense of responsibilty to sack some of the top people at TfL and to replace them with staff who will undo the enormous damage done over the past thirteen years. |
Just kerbed the alloys of my 4 week old Audi A5 entering the Rotherhithe tunnel. Where do I live? Just around the corner off Rotherhithe Street!
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk