![]() |
Hoxton Overground station survey
Hello,
I am conducting research on the impact of the Hoxton Overground station since it opened in 2010. The study is part of the requirements for the Masters in Urban Planning from the University of Amsterdam. I would like to ask you a few questions about how the station has impacted your connection to the community and the city. By taking the survey, you either have to live within the boundaries of Hoxton or use the Hoxton Overground station semi-frequently. You will find a link to the survey below: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/hoxtonovergroundsurvey For the purpose of this survey, the borders of Hoxton will be: The Regents Canal in the north, City Road/ Wharf Road in the west, Old Street/Hackney Road/Columbia Road in the south and Queensbridge Road in the East. No personal information will be collected in this survey and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please feel free to send this to anyone you think might be interested and fits the criteria. Thank you so much for you time, Patrick |
Quote:
In the days of British Rail there was no station at Hoxton. Trains ran non-stop between Broad Street and Dalston Junction. Before the Second World War there had been additional stations. Mildmay Park was closed in 1934, Haggerston was closed in May, 1940 and Shoreditch was closed in October 1940. When the War ended, it was decided not to reopen these stations, almost certainly because they had been so lightly patronised previously. I was extremely sceptical when TfL decided to build new stations at Haggerston and Hoxton. I thought even one station might prove to be a white elephant. From my, admittedly infrequent, observations, both Hoxton and Haggerston have turned out to be white elephants. I hope you return here with the results of your survey. |
Hoxton Overground station survey
In message , Robin9
writes From my, admittedly infrequent, observations, both Hoxton and Haggerston have turned out to be white elephants. According to figures published in the Guardian, Haggerston saw 1,172,578 entrances/exits last year, making it busier than Clapton, Hampton, Stoneleigh, Rochester, Paddock Wood, Andover, Mottingham and many other stations. Hoxton saw 1,042,854 entrances/exits, similar to Haringay, Nunhead, Telford Central, etc. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datab...tations-listed -rail -- Paul Terry |
Hoxton Overground station survey
In article , (Paul Terry)
wrote: In message , Robin9 writes From my, admittedly infrequent, observations, both Hoxton and Haggerston have turned out to be white elephants. According to figures published in the Guardian, Haggerston saw 1,172,578 entrances/exits last year, making it busier than Clapton, Hampton, Stoneleigh, Rochester, Paddock Wood, Andover, Mottingham and many other stations. Hoxton saw 1,042,854 entrances/exits, similar to Haringay, Nunhead, Telford Central, etc. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datab...ons-listed-rai l Some curious omissions and errors on that map. I couldn't find Dullingham or Shepreth. Foxton and Royston were badly mislocated with Foxton inside the City of Cambridge. The problem appears from the table to be with bad postcodes. Shepreth and Meldreth have the same one, for example. Colin Rosenstiel |
Quote:
people an hour board trains at Hoxton. My guess would have been half that. Mind you, it still means Hoxton is a lightly used station. At Leyton Undergound Station, about 80 people board trains every five minutes! |
Hoxton Overground station survey
"Robin9" wrote in message ... HoxtonOvergroundSurvey;136794 Wrote: Hello, I am conducting research on the impact of the Hoxton Overground station since it opened in 2010. The study is part of the requirements for the Masters in Urban Planning from the University of Amsterdam. I would like to ask you a few questions about how the station has impacted your connection to the community and the city. By taking the survey, you either have to live within the boundaries of Hoxton or use the Hoxton Overground station semi-frequently. You will find a link to the survey below: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/hoxtonovergroundsurvey For the purpose of this survey, the borders of Hoxton will be: The Regents Canal in the north, City Road/ Wharf Road in the west, Old Street/Hackney Road/Columbia Road in the south and Queensbridge Road in the East. No personal information will be collected in this survey and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please feel free to send this to anyone you think might be interested and fits the criteria. Thank you so much for you time, Patrick I hope you receive a response from every adult resident of Hoxton. In the days of British Rail there was no station at Hoxton. Trains ran non-stop between Broad Street and Dalston Junction. Before the Second World War there had been additional stations. Mildmay Park was closed in 1934, Haggerston was closed in May, 1940 and Shoreditch was closed in October 1940. When the War ended, it was decided not to reopen these stations, almost certainly because they had been so lightly patronised previously. But so where many others on what is now "the overground" Times have changed and these stations are now well used (again). tim |
Hoxton Overground station survey
On 2013-04-30 15:59:09 +0000, Robin9 said:
Quantify "well used". Figures were posted above. I live close by the line, midway between Dalston and Haggerston, and if you want reassurance I can tell you than there is much development in the area and many new flats, businesses and an influx of young people. The stations will get busier but are already fairly well used but many outlying stations have quiet periods off peak. The line got much busier when the Highbury link was opened and even busier now with Clapham. E. |
Hoxton Overground station survey
On Sunday, 28 April 2013 11:30:33 UTC+1, Robin9 wrote:
I was extremely sceptical when TfL decided to build new stations at Haggerston and Hoxton. I thought even one station might prove to be a white elephant. From my, admittedly infrequent, observations, both Hoxton and Haggerston have turned out to be white elephants. I hope you return here with the results of your survey. -- Robin9 What do you mean by "both Hoxton and Haggerston have turned out to be white elephants"? What level of use would be sufficient for you not to class them as "white elephants"? |
Hoxton Overground station survey
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:55:03 +0100
eastender wrote: On 2013-04-30 15:59:09 +0000, Robin9 said: Quantify "well used". Figures were posted above. I live close by the line, midway between Dalston and Haggerston, and if you want reassurance I can tell you than there is much development in the area and many new flats, businesses and an influx of young people. The stations will get busier but are already fairly well used but many outlying stations have quiet periods off peak. The line got much busier when the Highbury link was opened and even busier now with Clapham. It would be even busier still if TfL hadn't decided it could get a few extra pieces of silver but having it just brush zone 1 so making it pointless as a detour to avoid paying the zone 1 fare. It might also help if the trains did a bit more than 25 mph everywhere. -- Spud |
Hoxton Overground station survey
In article ,
d wrote: It would be even busier still if TfL hadn't decided it could get a few extra pieces of silver but having it just brush zone 1 so making it pointless as a detour to avoid paying the zone 1 fare. True - but IIRC, that was a decision imposed on TfL by DfT as a condition of TfL getting the funding to build the line in the first place. It might also help if the trains did a bit more than 25 mph everywhere. Depsite these points, it seems to be quite popular as it is! -- Mike Bristow |
Hoxton Overground station survey
On Wed, 1 May 2013 13:15:35 +0100
Mike Bristow wrote: In article , d wrote: It would be even busier still if TfL hadn't decided it could get a few extra pieces of silver but having it just brush zone 1 so making it pointless as a detour to avoid paying the zone 1 fare. True - but IIRC, that was a decision imposed on TfL by DfT as a condition of TfL getting the funding to build the line in the first place. Was it? I can't see the rationale behind that. Seems a bit mean spirited. It might also help if the trains did a bit more than 25 mph everywhere. Depsite these points, it seems to be quite popular as it is! No doubt, but it could be even more popular and take some strain off the tube. If I had to commute to canary wharf I personally wouldn't bother to use it. The DLR or Jubilee seem a much better - and direct - option given they cost the same. -- Spud |
Hoxton Overground station survey
On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:50:20 +0100
Paul Corfield wrote: needed. If Shoreditch High St had remained in Z2 then it is likely huge numbers of people would have changed onto the ELL to reach the City via SHS and Zone 2. If that abstraction had arisen then the DfT could have been lumbered with the bill for revenue support *or* there would have been demands from the TOCs for compensation from TfL. That is how the industry structure works. Figures. Industry first, passengers second, what a surprise. Still, I suppose if you're a City bound commuter and you don't mind a walk you can always get off at Hoxton going south or Whitechapel going north to avoid zone 1. I agree it is rather leisurely but I think the low running speeds and padded timetables are how the impressive performance stats are achieved. If everything was scheduled "on a knife edge" then it would take almost nothing to cause the service to run late and be delayed. But it would only be delayed on paper. It would still generally be quicker in practice. There are quite long stretches where 40mph is easily achievable with the acceleration of the trains. It seems a bit of a cop out to run them so slow. -- Spud |
Hoxton Overground station survey
On 2013\05\01 15:50, Paul Corfield wrote:
Yes it was. The rationale was to prevent astraction of revenue from TOCs running into London Bridge and Cannon St where a Z1 ticket is needed. If Shoreditch High St had remained in Z2 then it is likely huge numbers of people would have changed onto the ELL to reach the City via SHS and Zone 2. If that abstraction had arisen then the DfT could have been lumbered with the bill for revenue support *or* there would have been demands from the TOCs for compensation from TfL. That is how the industry structure works. I don't like the fact that the ELL has been placed on Z1 as it spoils the Z23 orbital concept but I am pleased we actually got the line built. They could make Shoreditch Zone 1 for entering or exiting, but Zone 2 for passing through. BTW, I still can't believe that they didn't just call that station "Shoreditch". The walk from the old station to the new one is about the same as the walk from Angel's old entrance to new one, but they didn't feel the need to rename Angel. And SHS is not in the High Street anyway. |
Quote:
hours. Building new railway stations costs a fortune. As George Osborne keep telling us, we haven't got fortunes to chuck around. Therefore public money should be spent only on projects which are going to benefit large numbers of people. |
Quote:
They show that it is lightly used. Certainly many other stations in London are also lightly used but they were built many years ago. They are not new builds as part of a new project. |
Hoxton Overground station survey
|
Hoxton Overground station survey
|
Hoxton Overground station survey
On 2013-05-02 06:40:58 +0000, said:
Hardly. The size of the pubic sector will still be as large Thank goodness for that. E. |
Hoxton Overground station survey
On Wed, 1 May 2013 17:33:57 +0100
eastender wrote: On 2013-05-01 12:52:55 +0000, d said: If I had to commute to canary wharf I personally wouldn't bother to use it. The DLR or Jubilee seem a much better - and direct - option given they cost the same. Well, if like my wife you live in Dalston and work in Canary Wharf I bet you would use it, changing at either Shadwell or Canada Water. It only takes her about 20 mins to get there. Of course you could opt for the 277 bus instead - let's have a race. If your nearest station is on the ELL then sure. But if the ELL is just one option then I can't see the point. Why for example would anyone travelling down from finsbury park bother changing onto it at Highbury and be taken all around the houses and still have to change at canada water when they could just stay on the victoria line straight to green park then get the jubilee? -- Spud |
Hoxton Overground station survey
|
Hoxton Overground station survey
On Thu, 02 May 2013 11:32:45 +0100
David Cantrell wrote: On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:52:55PM +0000, d wrote: No doubt, but it could be even more popular and take some strain off the tube. If I had to commute to canary wharf I personally wouldn't bother to use it. The DLR or Jubilee seem a much better - and direct - option given they cost the same. You what? Of course the Jubilee and DLR are better for Canary Wharf than the Overground is, what with them, umm, going to Canary Wharf. Um yes, hello? I meant instead of using the ELL and changing at canada water or shadwell. -- Spud |
Hoxton Overground station survey
eastender wrote:
On 2013-05-02 06:40:58 +0000, said: Hardly. The size of the pubic sector will still be as large Thank goodness for that. I disagree; I fully endorse any efforts to make shavings in that area. I don't think anyone would argue with the government's increases to personal wax allowances, for example (although I suspect proposed changes to benefit married couples are entirely misdirected.) |
Hoxton Overground station survey
"eastender" wrote in message news:2013050208050585104-nospam@nospamcom... On 2013-05-02 06:40:58 +0000, said: Hardly. The size of the pubic sector will still be as large Thank goodness for that. The problem with the public sector having no expectation to save money means that it has no incentive to avoid waste mediocre performance gets rewarded and poor performance goes un-punished This can't be a good thing (unless you are one of the poor performers, that is) |
Hoxton Overground station survey
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk